Mostly that video is a pile of crap. I didn't get very far in to the conspiracy nonsense but right off the bat they talked about 'that kid'.
The kid hacked a web site but that is NOT the official results. The results are tabulated from the paper ballots. Even when votes are counted electronically, there is a paper trail.
Unless results are close, votes aren't recounted. But they can be and often are. Bush vs Florida comes to mind. One can argue with the 'chad' thing but there was a paper trail. Hint: Our main-in ballots require a signature which is manually compared with an exemplar every time I vote. Furthermore, I have the legal right to ask if my vote was counted (it might not be if I made extraneous marks on the ballot, for example).
The real problem isn't the machines or the technology, the problem is the candidates. How does somebody come up with enough money to spend tens of millions of dollars running for state office that pays $100k/year? Well, they sold out to somebody and it isn't the poor people - they can't contribute the kind of money it takes to win an election.
Most voting machines aren't networked. The votes are stored inside the machine and downloaded back at the Registrar's office. There are variations, of course, but mostly the votes are secure.
Every once in awhile, the votes from an entire district are 'lost' or 'suddenly found'. This doesn't do much for creating a warm fuzzy feeling. This crap doesn't happen in the large states where politics is serious. There are too many special interests watching every step in the process. But for the smaller states, their impact on national elections is so small that their votes are meaningless. Unless they gang up to support a candidate. Then they matter. Hillary's strategy to skip over smaller states cost her 'bigly'.
Russia hacking the voting process itself? I kind of doubt it. But, Russia producing propaganda on social media? Definitely. Nobody has come up with even 1 vote electronically changed by Russia but there are many examples of propaganda on Twitter and Facebook. This is life in the age of the Internet. Get used to it!
Then there are the conspiracy nuts that have a "Show". Like the video. The Internet provides these nuts with an outsized presence and audience. Any fool can start a YouTube channel. "Conspiracies R' Us!" Indeed, the Internet provides an 'echo chamber' so like minded folks can reinforce each other and never encounter a contradicting idea.
There is no such thing as 'Voter Suppression'. There may be a requirement for ID, why wouldn't there be? I need ID to get on an airplane, why not to vote? Remember the signature requirement above? That tracks back to my California Driver License and to the property records. They know exactly who I am and where I live (assuming I kept DMV updated which I am legally required to do). DMVs also issue non-driver ID cards.
Yes, there are examples of intimidation - like the Black Panthers suppressing white voters in the '08 election.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party_voter_intimidation_casePerhaps it is raining and hard to get to a polling place. Maybe it is a bit out of the way. Maybe there are long lines (mail-in ballots are the way to go!). Maybe a lot of things... But when only 58% of eligible voters even bother to vote, I don't think folks should be yelling about suppression. In Singapore, voting is mandatory!
And, anyway, what's it to you? You don't live here (according to your location flag).