Author Topic: Poor Man's GSWC - gallium stabilized weston cell  (Read 1701 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline zhtoorTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • !
  • Posts: 337
  • Country: pk
Poor Man's GSWC - gallium stabilized weston cell
« on: October 30, 2017, 01:06:50 pm »
-
« Last Edit: May 22, 2018, 01:08:35 am by EEVblog »
 

Offline Echo88

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 826
  • Country: de
Re: Poor Man's GSWC - gallium stabilized weston cell
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2017, 03:34:55 pm »
If the other guys didnt say it often enough: Weston-Cells are not used anymore, because they are vastly inferior in every aspect to a standard LTZ1000-module:

-HAZMAT - its a cocktail of mercury and cadmium in a glass vial: nobody wants this stuff
-cant be transported without problems / nobody wants to transport this stuff
-temperature coefficient larger than a LTZ1000
-cant be loaded at all / necessitates complicated equipment

Even if somebody would donate me one, i wouldnt want to have it, because of the chemical gunk in the glass vial. Conrad also has thrown his away.

Now to the Gallium-Cell-idea: These cells are expensive as fuck (as far as i know, may be they cost way less in Pakistan, also they arent operating at their triple point) and arent contributing in any way more than a standard temperature controller.
 

Offline Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14206
  • Country: de
Re: Poor Man's GSWC - gallium stabilized weston cell
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2017, 03:37:56 pm »
The standard cells prefer a lower temperature for long life. A good Pt RTD and large enough a container should be good enough. So I don't think it is a good idea.
 
The following users thanked this post: zhtoor

Offline zhtoorTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • !
  • Posts: 337
  • Country: pk
Re: Poor Man's GSWC - gallium stabilized weston cell
« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2017, 03:52:04 pm »
(as far as i know, may be they cost way less in Pakistan, also they arent operating at their triple point) and arent contributing in any way more than a standard temperature controller.

hello,

gallium cell achieves a melt temperature variance of around +- 0.02 milli kelvins.
could you educate me to a competing electronically controlled "standard temperature controller" that achieves something similar?

regards.
 

Offline zhtoorTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • !
  • Posts: 337
  • Country: pk
Re: Poor Man's GSWC - gallium stabilized weston cell
« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2017, 04:03:36 pm »
If the other guys didnt say it often enough: Weston-Cells are not used anymore, because they are vastly inferior in every aspect to a standard LTZ1000-module:

-HAZMAT - its a cocktail of mercury and cadmium in a glass vial: nobody wants this stuff

hello again,

as far as haz-mat is concerned you probably already have CFL's all over the place which contain - guess what - mercury.

as far as LTZ1000 being superior in all respects, well one aspect would be the noise comparison, and the other i will let LT
tell you:-

please see attached file.

regards.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2017, 04:07:30 pm by zhtoor »
 

Offline Echo88

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 826
  • Country: de
Re: Poor Man's GSWC - gallium stabilized weston cell
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2017, 04:14:16 pm »
Guess which amount of mercury a CCFL contains? Milligrams! You break the thing, open a window for a few hours and gone are the tiny amounts of mercury. Now try that with a Weston-Cell.

You also dont need 0.02 mK temperature stability. A analog/digital-pid fully suffices as a temperature controller for a voltage reference, like it is done in a 732B.

 

Offline Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14206
  • Country: de
Re: Poor Man's GSWC - gallium stabilized weston cell
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2017, 04:39:11 pm »
The Weston cell is not suitable for every day or long term use, so having low noise is not really a feature one can practically use. Also the very high impedance amplifier needed for more than occasional use will add to the noise.

With a TC of some 20 ppm/C there is no need for a temperature more stable than lets say 10 mK over a short time. For a large and thus likely slow system to stabilize a digital controller may be more suitable than an old style analog version.
 
The following users thanked this post: zhtoor

Offline tggzzz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 19511
  • Country: gb
  • Numbers, not adjectives
    • Having fun doing more, with less
Re: Poor Man's GSWC - gallium stabilized weston cell
« Reply #7 on: October 30, 2017, 06:24:42 pm »
The Weston cell is not suitable for every day or long term use, so having low noise is not really a feature one can practically use.

I've used a saturated Weston cell to verify that a new-old meter (a Solartron 7081) was less noisy than an external reference voltage. The latter exhibits 15uV/1.5ppm popcorn noise.

Other than that, I agree with what you have said; I find my saturated cells make an amusing temperature sensor (for my sins I picked up 4 from a school that was closing down).
There are lies, damned lies, statistics - and ADC/DAC specs.
Glider pilot's aphorism: "there is no substitute for span". Retort: "There is a substitute: skill+imagination. But you can buy span".
Having fun doing more, with less
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf