I don't think there's much chance of Paris Hilton getting coverage to be honest. Unless one of the guys' nieces / nephews somehow hijacks the show. What I like about it is that (as has been said) it is a couple of engineers talking about "stuff", with more focus than the canteen or water cooler, but nevertheless it is real people talking about stuff that has cropped up in the last week, experiences about the industry, and technical greasy bits that don't get coverage in more formal media. I think as soon as you start scripting and start planning too much, then the real people just become actors and it doesn't work.
MBAs... I'm afraid I am kinda with Dave on this. I have seen too many MBAs who think they are the bees' knees and manage everything in sight, causing problems where none existed. I kinda rank them with other "paper" qualified people such as Microsoft and Cisco certified engineers, who have been on an expensive course and think they know it all. Just as there are damn good IT techs who are MCSEs, there are good managers who are MBAs, but then they were good all along, the paperwork didn't make them that way.
Anyone but Ben Heck please, he has a great garage full of nice tools, but all he does is make boxes for gaming consoles! He is an artist and film maker (his own words) but not an engineer, and doesn't have the engineering background that Jeri and Limor (LadyAda) have.
Programmes like The Amp Hour inherently evolve. For example, the workbench of the week was great to begin with, but now it's just a matter of listing what gear you can see in the photo. I'm sure that's great for the guys whose workbench it is, but I find myself just disinterested, or shocked at how some newbie has test gear far better than mine. After all, it is a podcast, if you don't like it don't listen, or jump past the bits you don't like! It isn't as if you paid anything to subscribe to it.