I have the following circuit:
Path 1: Audio in -> audio switch 1 -> pot 1 -> audio out
Path 2: Audio in -> audio switch 2 -> pot 2 -> audio out
I've also tried the pot / switch order reversed:
Path 1: Audio in -> pot 1 -> audio switch 1 -> audio out
Path 2: Audio in -> pot 2 -> audio switch 2 -> audio out
Keep in mind only one switch is open at a time. Although the switch I use does have a max of 10ohm leakage. Also the other audio wires are all grounded together.
What I've noticed with either setup above is that if I use the pot for the open channel (audio switch not allowing ac through), it effects the volume for the other (closed, lets AC through) channel. It's not quite linear, but if I turn it all the way down it shuts off audio completely.
What I think is happening is that because audio is AC, it still travels back to the other pot from the other side, even if it's channel is open. So in the end what I did is this setup that worked:
Path 1: Audio in -> audio switch 1 -> pot 1 -> audio switch 2 -> audio out
Path 2: Audio in -> audio switch 3 -> pot 2 -> audio switch 4 -> audio out
Now when Path 1 is open (won't let AC through) it will open switch 1 and 2, thus the AC can't sneak in and be effected by the pot's resistance. Voila.
Question: Is this thought logic correct? The reason I'm asking is because I'd really like to get away with only using 1 switch per path.. I'm thinking 2 switches per path if overkill, or is that what's really needed here?
Thanks a bunch!
Todd