If I've understood you correctly, you want to duplicate
this or
this?
Whether the series/source termination resistor is before or after the series DC-blocking capacitor, does not seem to affect anything based on simulations. (I don't have suitable test equipment to test it in practice.) These signals are
transmission lines with the characteristic impedance of 75Ω, and a termination resistance of 75Ω to ground in each receiver device. However, me being a hobbyist, I don't have the experience to tell whether there is some transmission-line magick where the order of the resistor and capacitor matters.
As you can see in the THS7374 datasheet I linked to earlier, many (most?) video signal sources produce 2× voltage amplitude swing, so 2×0.700Vpp = 1.4Vpp for PAL S-Video luma, and 2×0.885Vpp = 1.77Vpp for PAL S-Video 100% color bar chroma, according to
this Analog article. The source has 75Ω in series, and the sink has 75Ω to ground. This minimizes reflections and makes for a very good transmission line. The two resistors do form a voltage divider by half, which is why the source voltage amplitude is typically twice that seen on the receiver.
So, what we expect to see in analog video signals, is this:
where the characteristic impedance of the cable is also 75Ω. (Its DC resistance is less than 1Ω; "characteristic impedance" is a transmission line property for varying/non-DC signals.)
Rs is the source/series termination, Cc is the AC coupling (DC blocking) capacitor (220µF to 330µF is common, exact value is not that important), and RL is the load termination. While Rs and RL do mean that the voltage seen at the video ADC is half that at the video DAC output, it gives excellent signal transmission properties, and is the reason this topology is used.
Physical connectors don't affect this picture much.
Adding a capacitor to ground between Rs and Cc will attenuate the AC-coupled signal. Just 47pF will reduce a 24 MHz signal by 3% in voltage amplitude, and 1µF drops it to one-thousandth. This means the C11-C13 must either have tiny capacitances, or be omitted altogether; but they can be used as a low-pass filter, removing thin spikes and sharp edges. Because of their frequency dependent behaviour, they cannot be used to attenuate the entire voltage signal; a resistor is used for that.
A resistor to ground, basically anywhere right of Rs, can be used to attenuate the voltage. In the case we have here, with Rs = RL = 75Ω, the amplification factor caused by that added resistor Rg is calculated as Rg / (Rg + 37.5), as it is a simple voltage divider (with 2× source voltage by default). For example, Rg = 75Ω scales the voltage amplitude
at the video ADC in the receiver by 2/3, and Rg = 37.5Ω halves it.
Let's say that your device has omitted Rs and Cc, replacing them with simple shorts. (If they're simply
omitted, there is no continuity to the back panel connector.)
Then, the cable would need to have the Rs and Cc in it. Again, for smoothing the signal (forming a low-pass filter), there could be a small few-picofarad filter capacitor to ground after the series resistor.
If you ask me, I would bet that the existing PAL N64 S-Video cables have a THS7374 in them, with a 3.3V linear regulator from the 5V available (to get a steady, low-noise supply), and have 75Ω in series and 75Ω to ground on luma and chroma inputs; and on output, a 75Ω and 220µF/330µF in series with the actual cable. Even the connector shape matches! The reason is that the THS7374 acts like a buffer, and makes sure that the video signals on its output have the correct levels and drive.
If so, it would be very easy and cheap to make such a board at e.g. JLCPCB. THS7374IPWR (TSSOP14 footprint, 5mm×4.5mm body, 0.65mm leg pitch; hand-solderable using the dragging method like 0.65mm pitch TQFPs) itself is just
0.48€ in singles at Mouser,
0.45€ at LCSC, and
$0.50 at JLCPCB for assembly. The connectors will cost much more than the electronics parts. Some of the component values may need slight tuning, observing the signal with an oscilloscope, for best results; in particular if the low-pass filtering picofarad capacitors are used. Which brings me back to the existing cables: 50€ or so for a known, tested one sounds like a good buy in my opinion; you'll certainly end up spending that much in parts and shipping if you go the DIY way.