No, the wording doesn’t say the power consumption is in the capacitor
Yes, I see, but you wrote it in that way that it looks like I was said that capacitor will consume power. But that's not true.
just that you thought adding the capacitor increased power consumption in total
No. I don't have that thought.
Which is something you stated in the thread over and over and over.
I didn't stated that. I was talk about different thing.
You're needs to apply additional power to charge capacitor, this is why instantaneous power will be higher. That additional power will not be loss, it remains in the system, but it is required to be taken from generator. Which requires to apply more power on generator rotor.
After all, I don't understand - what is the reason to link that discussion in this topic? Could you please clarify?
I think it will be more correct to discuss it in original topic. Isn't it?
We could substitute “reading comprehension” for listening, and you just proved our point: you don’t listen, or in this case, read carefully. You’re seeing what you want to see, not what’s actually written.
You're just pull an owl on a globe. It looks like you're see what you want to see, not what actually is.
Really, I don't see the reason for your aggression. You are acting like a bully, trying to find a reason to quarrel. For what?
Сould you please calm down and communicate on the topic instead of expressing your subjective opinion about persons?