@Trader, that's really interesting but more for other meters. The UT210E uses hall-effect sensors which work on a different principle than the Fluke sensor which looks like a Rogowski coil which are know to be sensitive to were the wire is position. That said, it strikes me that all the pictures in the datasheet have the loop hanging around the wires which is convenient but the worst position for accuracy according to the very same datasheet. Moreover they are shown surrounding several cables at one which is normally a no-no with clamp meters. Maybe that is useful to get an idea if the currents are not balanced? It looks very odd.
@mike_mike: Check that the clamp is really closed properly. The ends need to be in contact across the whole area. In the UT210E the mechanics of clamp are really not very strong despite looking fairly robust. I had to glue mine already. The proper position for the wire is actually marked on the clamp with two little triangles on either side. Its much closer to the hinge than to the opening. The UT210E has only hall-effect sensors, and no current transformer, so the hall effect sensors are in use even for AC.The only difference is that for AC current, you don't need to zero the meter because the "DC" part is cancelled out. However, repeated measurements of strong AC currents can leave your meter magnetised just as happens with DC currents. So its a good idea to occasionally de-magnetize the clamp with a degaussing coil (an AC field that slowly decays to zero over a few seconds) . I use one of the cheap chinese de-magnitizing units for that which is basically a mains transformer with only a primary and the iron core cut open. I added a PTC to get the automatically decaying field instead of having to slowly move the meter away from the running de-magnetiser which also works...