I have a little bit issue or confusion on my Uni-T DMM, which one should i trust more? resistant measurement? or capacitance measurement? so this poll can give me some clue. hope everybody vote. Thanx.
Well the " measuring circuit " confused me a bit ..
Would you describe my own new " Resistor decade box " as " measuring circuit " ?
Second question:
Are we talking about reference parts ?
your decade box is not measuring circuit to my definition. i mean the circuit inside a DMM or LC meter. and DMM with R and C measurement. anything that read out R and C value.
I would tend to trust the resistance ranges more, check your user manual for accuracy. Doing proper capacitance testing is a real pain in the posterior, not least because the value changes with the voltage across it.
It just seems like a 4 wire resistance measurement is much easier to be accurate than a capacitance measurement. (Two wires providing current for voltage drop. Two wires reading voltage across resistor without that current flowing in them to reduce the error of voltage drop across the probe wires.)
With capacitance, you have a harder time with the probes acting partially as capacitors or inductors.
Just looking at typical specs for a similarly priced resistance meter (DMM) and capacitance meter should provide the answer. You could also look at how expensive the top-off-the-range resistance/capacitance meters perform, my guess is that the resistance meters will be much better. Most good multimeters with a capacitance range have much worse specs for capacitance compared to resistance, although you could argue that
The
Fluke UK calibration service can measure resistances with an uncertainty of 2ppm, but capacitance only with an uncertainty of 200ppm.
Resistance measurement is a much simpler process, it's just DC voltage and/or current, which are much easier to accurately determine than AC voltages. It also helps that resistors are much closer to ideal than capacitors. For example, resistors do exhibit some voltage coefficient at high voltages, but some ceramic capacitors (like Z5U) can easily lose half of their capacitance if some DC voltage is applied. This makes getting an accurate value much harder. It's also rare to see capacitors with a tolerance better than a few percent, and even the specialty precision ones are only 0.1%. 1% resistors are dirt cheap, and 0.1% are also easily available, and they go much lower once you get into the specialty precision stuff.
Precision capacitors also tend to have a very low value, which makes parasitic capacitances much more significant. I don't think you'll find many 1uF 0.1% capacitors.
I can not understand , the point of your inquiry .
But I can speak about my DMM's , and the story is sort .
The Fluke 28II freshest and top of the cream , cannot measure small ceramic capacitors.
Measuring anything else like resistance or volts , its no issue.
The 20 years old medium priced DMM , it can measure small ceramics and medium capacitors .
But in anything above 1Mohm , it looks that measures totally wrong and completely out of specs.
Now I have a good reason to never trash my oldie medium priced DMM , because it does what the Fluke does not.
And now the conclusion, you collect and keep 2-3 instruments that its one has an strong point .
Yes, the capacitance range on DMMs sucks, which is why people buy dedicated LCR meters.
If you really want good resistance measurment, 4 wire is the only way. Even this technique has some flaws. Two wires provide a constant current across the resistor (the easy part). It doesn't matter how long they are because the circuit inside the meter is always supplying the same current. Then the other two wires sense the voltage on the resistor. The same circuit is used for this as for measuring DC volts. So if the input impedance of the voltmeter isn't very high >1 Gohm you can get seriously inaccurate readings in the higher ranges.
Same goes for LCR meters. 4 wire technique is a must in LCR meters.
I'm not sure that handheld LCR meters are any more accurate than a good DMM with capacitance support from brands like Agilent or Fluke. I've personally tested many and am completing a performance test of the 1252a and 87V meters, and they are on par. Alas, I've never used those super expensive ones to act as comparison. But dedicated handheld LCR meters aren't any better than 1%, which at least the 87V or the 1252a are too. Where LCR meters excel is the added calculations done like quality factor, ESR etc., and particularly easier uH measurements.
As tekfan says, calculating capacitance to any better resolution requires far more advance techniques, and such meters suddenly jump from $150 DMM types, to $21,000+ types.
In the 20+ years I've owned Fluke 80 series DMM, they changed the method of calculating capacitance, the early one were just RC time constants using old board timer and constant current; its described in the service manuals of the generation 1 and 2 Flukes. Model 3 and up use a method now common today even in lesser brand DMM and LCR meters, but where they differ between brand names and no-names is the quality of the implementation. But none I've seen have gotten >1% at best for accuracy. if done right.
I'm not sure that dedicated handheld style LCR meters are any more accurate than a good DMM with capacitance support from brands like Agilent or Fluke. I've personally tested many and am completing a performance test of the 1252a and 87V meters, and they are on par. Alas, I've never used those super expensive ones to act as comparison. But the dedicated LCR meters aren't any better than 1%, which at least the 87V or the 1252a are.
The Agilent U1701A (the only handheld 'LCR' meter they're still selling
) has a max. resolution of 0.1pF, and an accuracy of 0.5% for the 100nF-1000uF ranges. The Agilent U1253B has a max. resoultion of 1pF and an accuracy of 1% from 10nF to 10mF, so the dedicated meter is slightly better, especially for low values. This ignores inductance measurement, which usually sucks on those DMMs that offer it.
As tekfan says, calculating capacitance to any better resolution requires far more advance techniques, and such meters suddenly jump from $150 DMM types, to $21,000+ types.
Better resolution, definitely, you'll probably require a special fixture to even get a usable 1pF resolution. Getting a better accuracy for higher values (=less worry about parasitics) for much less than $10k should be possible. Accurate DC voltages, resistors and frequency measurement/generation are all easy and cheap. But if you're buying new and need an off-the-shelf solution, you'll have to spend the big bucks.
Thanks alm! 0.5%, for $158. Its not on all the ranges, but its better than the DMM's which are 1% throughout.
I'm not sure that handheld LCR meters are any more accurate than a good DMM with capacitance support from brands like Agilent or Fluke. I've personally tested many and am completing a performance test of the 1252a and 87V meters, and they are on par. Alas, I've never used those super expensive ones to act as comparison. But dedicated handheld LCR meters aren't any better than 1%, which at least the 87V or the 1252a are too. Where LCR meters excel is the added calculations done like quality factor, ESR etc., and particularly easier uH measurements.
Of course. Those instruments are only for rough checks. If you really need precision, then you need precision at the intended operating frequency, not just at the one or two preselected measurement frequencies of the handhelds. Which takes you to the very expensive impedance analysers that allow for freely selecting the measurement frequency, or that sweep their entire frequency range and give you a nice bode plot with real and complex (or magnitude/phase) components as a function of frequency.
If you really need precision
The only time that I ever needed precision in capacitors ,
was when I needed to build an stereo preamplifier .
And so I think that the percentage of the technicians, who will have an such need ,
so to get something as an very special tool , will be very low.
Haven't looked at this specific seller, but lots of 'test equipment vendors' on eBay price their equipment at about 20x market price, in the hope that once in a blue moon someone comes along that's crazy/desperate enough to buy it. For example, if you have a test procedure that uses a certain piece of equipment, acquiring it for a lot of money may still be cheaper than changing the procedure and retraining staff. Looking at the price of sold items is a much better indication than looking at asking prices.
But 0.05% basic accuracy is quite impressive, so I don't expect these to be $0.01 Z5U capacitors either.
Kiri! can you build this? a precision capacitor decade box!
well I was ready to make something similar ,
but at the end i decide to not go for it.
The reason is simple , I have no use for such an instrument.
I would need one, only if I would had take seriously the idea of starting my own business ,
about multimeter's repairs & calibration.
Kiri! can you build this? a precision capacitor decade box!
well I was ready to make something similar ,
but at the end i decide to not go for it.
The reason is simple , I have no use for such an instrument.
I would need one, only if I would had take seriously the idea of starting my own business ,
about multimeter's repairs & calibration.
I found a substitution box with the most common values to be good enough for just circuit hacking. And apparently about $5k cheaper too.
a precision capacitor decade box!
well I was ready to make something similar ,
I found a substitution box with the most common values to be good enough for just circuit hacking. And apparently about $5k cheaper too.
if you can provide the link. it will be helpfull
i think they put good weight of gold inside.