I used to be the technical editor for a well known computer magazine here in the UK. I've said this here before, but it bears retelling. There's an old saw that nutters write to the papers and magazines
ALL IN CAPITALS AND IN GREEN INK.. I can say, having been the man to open the post more than once to find a letter just like that, that it
really happens. Not only that, but I've observed the phenomenon at more than one magazine that gets letters from the public.
Not all crazy "letters to the editor" are that obvious, but there's a loose rule that the more idiosyncratic the presentation, the higher the probability that the writer has some *ahem* alternative approach to reality. So alternative CAPITALISATIONS, alternative 'uses' of ??, punctuation
marks, random font changes or bolding and
heavy emphasis of half the clauses in every sentence are all signs that should be heeded. Also warning signs to heed are: rando speeling (sic), inappropriate usage of argot of the kind that you'd expect from someone who when speaking ends every sentence with "innit, fam", as should dropping of initial capitals and final full stops, the absence of paragraphs, or every sentence being a paragraph to itself, or no real fully formed sentences at all. See more than one symptom in a letter and it goes in the "funny letters" file rather than getting published or answered; 'funny' here being
'funny peculiar', not
'funny ha-ha'.
Sometimes the letters are funny ha-ha as well, but more often they're either sad, slightly scary or, thankfully rarely, need to be immediately passed to the police. I've seen a couple of the latter too.
Oh, and you know that footnote on the letters page that says something like "
Letters may be edited for length or clarity"? Ninety percent of those worth publishing need editing for either clarity, spelling or basic grammar.
So, that's about 9% less that need editing when compared with what the actual paid writers turn in.