Hello,
I suspect that the bandwidth difference between Analog Discovery [,2,3] and ADP2230 is not significant.
I am disappointed with the ADP2230. The large memory is nice, and USB 3 is nice.
But you can no longer use the Curvetracer application. You lose the differential inputs. It still works with digital zoom.
The advantage of the Analog Discovery [,2,3] for me is that it's a small lab. The flywire is ideal for working with breadboards. The differential inputs are useful for analyzing circuits in teaching.
With the new WaveForms and two AD3 you get an oscillograph with four differential channels and four generators and I think four voltage sources. That's nice.
Somehow the ADP2230 is neither meat nor fish. Where is the area of application?
A funny effect. The AD [,2,3] has 30 pins and there are five 6 pin male headers to change the gender.
The ADP2230 has 32 pins and also five 6 pin male headers to change the gender. Nobody seems to have noticed this yet. But maybe you don't need ten ground connections.
What also bothers me, is that many computers have few USB-C sockets. The ADP2230 and AD3 comes with a USB-C to USB-C cable. Why is that? Many therefore need an additional adapter and I know from experience that many of these adapters are only capable of USB 2, even if they are offered as USB 3.
I also find it very frustrating, when you have bought an ADP2230 and when you get it and are already looking forward to it, you realize that you can't connect it at all and have to wait until you get an adapter.
Why not get a new, affordable 12-bit oscillograph?
Perhaps one AD3 and one Siglent SDS804X HD brings very much more benefit for a little more money.
Best regards
egonotto