Hi Dave,
thanks for your rant
![Evil >:D](https://www.eevblog.com/forum/Smileys/default/xevil.gif.pagespeed.ic.tdrs7Uj5gu.png)
. Hilarious!
![Grin ;D](https://www.eevblog.com/forum/Smileys/default/xgrin.gif.pagespeed.ic.QVVz6XIT20.png)
I love how you explain things, there's nothing like it here in good old Germany
![Indifferent :=\](https://www.eevblog.com/forum/Smileys/default/indifferent0023.gif.pagespeed.ce.nyXMDasYXd.gif)
One thing, though: If you just feed a constant current through these LED's without all the
fancy circuit, the power source would surely be earlier depleted than with these spikes at
91 kHz?
Calculating the amount of power contained under these curves should show that a lot
less is needed to light those LED's at 91 kHz, which no eye can follow and which seens
like constant lighting.
Gosh, how I love electronics and high frequency experiments. I have set up quite a nice
little bench here for my radio amateur equipment...
![Azn ^-^](https://www.eevblog.com/forum/Smileys/default/azn.gif.pagespeed.ce.7t5xC2ZH_H.gif)
Keep up the good works down under, Dave!
![ThumbsUp :-+](https://www.eevblog.com/forum/Smileys/default/icon_smile_thumbsup.gif.pagespeed.ce._JElyJQqdB.gif)
Alex DH2ID