Dave, if anything, this video will help others disassemble their mics.
My guess about the spring is that at the end of the hole there is some part that may rattle. A weight perhaps? Or maybe it’s to add tension to the entire case? So the entire cylinder, after sliding into the tube, is held firmly (but softly) also in the diagonal direction? After all the construction is to some degree flexible and will have some response in audio range.
If Rode replies that it’s your fault, because you moved “the tuning screw,” we will know!

I ruined it for you...you blew me away with those pliers as an open-end wrench. Completely advanced "expertise in selecting the right tool for the right application."
That line stopped right at the moment it was about to tell us which tool is better suited for the task.

I assume you have a frequency generator... you could have done a "frequency response characteristic of the device." Now that's "tarred ass." "Unacceptable user interference with the internal structure of the device." I wouldn't accept the complaint. Sorry, but "tinkering with the breeder reactor" is not included in the "permissible range of end-user interference."
A very rough description is already given in the preceding post.
From that alone we may make a reasonable guess it’s not just a simple low-pass or high-pass filtering. So what would feeding a chirp help with? The mic also goes to the manufacturer, without any attempts to fix it, so that knowledge would not be too useful even if we gained it somehow from the response chart.
A frequency generator isn’t needed either, if it’s going to be fed through speakers. Frequency sweep can be just played from a file. 20 – 20 kHz chirp in attachment, if you wish to characterize your microphone, Tumember. But I swear… good luck making any conclusions about how impedances in the speakers, microphone, and amplifiers create that response from the chart alone.