The anti-gun media used to demand a total and complete ban on private ownership of guns in the US claiming that "if it saves one child, then it's worth it". I think the same can be said about a ban of pre-adolescent children on Social Media.
We've all heard about Epstein's island and other cases where powerful people managed to hide terrible crimes for years. One reason such things eventually come to light is that someone is willing to speak out.
Is it "conspirator thinking" to suggest the "terrible crimes" were just where they (law) could attack the regime? The only purchase "law" could have on that group of powerful people? Themselves probably trapped deliberately by those same crimes, tempted and then blackmailed.
The question I ask is... what else where they conspiring together on that island in that power steeped social group. I can bet you it will now have been good.
But it's way off topic, so probably best either ignored or left as rhetorical.