Can reactive power be recycled fast enough to power resistive loads?

[Chet]

Look, if you think that a particular circuit, is going to produce free-energy.

Don't make a 7+ page thread about it (***Too late!), make one and see if it works.

Simulators, don't really count, as they are not normally 100% reliable.  Especially if using them in funny ways, such as trying to create free-energy.

Why should I waste my time and other resources building a circuit which I have not thoroughly tested in a simulated environment? Why should I risk electrocuting myself for my failure to see if the circuit is dangerous?

Maybe I should have possessed lots of money so that I could purchase Ansys, or something similar, to simulate the behavior of the materials of construction in addition to their electrical properties?

Have you ever heard the phrase;

“Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat”

"Proof lies on him who asserts, not on him who denies".

Yes:  he who makes a bold assertion needs to produce a proof thereof.

I have already cited my proofs as references for my schematic.

[Chet]

Look, if you think that a particular circuit, is going to produce free-energy.

Don't make a 7+ page thread about it (***Too late!), make one and see if it works.

Simulators, don't really count, as they are not normally 100% reliable.  Especially if using them in funny ways, such as trying to create free-energy.

Why should I waste my time and other resources building a circuit which I have not thoroughly tested in a simulated environment? Why should I risk electrocuting myself for my failure to see if the circuit is dangerous?

Maybe I should have possessed lots of money so that I could purchase Ansys, or something similar, to simulate the behavior of the materials of construction in addition to their electrical properties?

Have you ever heard the phrase;

“Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat”

"Proof lies on him who asserts, not on him who denies".

Already cited my references. If you wish to ignore them due to your opinion that they are not relevant to my simulated demonstrations of those citations, then I'm left with a dead-end.

[Chet]

I am addressing everyone, or anyone, here to which this applies...

A simulation has been sufficient enough of a demonstration to warrant spending any time on it and has already been provided within attachments in message #92 and message #150. This archetype is one of the few circuits which survived my transitioning from 32-bit to 64-bit OS. Simplifying and replacing its nonlinear framework with a magical block diagram is altering the circuit beyond any ability to study it.

Word salad is not my fault. Nor is it yours. It seems that you are stuck with the prospect of no one having ever shared this knowledge with you before now. Maybe it's not required to become an electrical engineer? Yet, that does not preclude the possibility that it may not be useful beyond mere entertainment value.

[TimFox]

More on simulations:
In my career, I found it was easier to get a wrong answer than a verifiably correct answer when simulating complicated electrical circuits or radiation shielding.
Therefore, it was mandatory to get experimental verification of a simulated result before continuing to tweaking parameters to improve the design.
Which led to my usual response, when asked for simulations instead of measurements: “What answer do you want?”

[Chet]

More on simulations:
In my career, I found it was easier to get a wrong answer than a verifiably correct answer when simulating complicated electrical circuits or radiation shielding.
Therefore, it was mandatory to get experimental verification of a simulated result before continuing to tweaking parameters to improve the design.
Which led to my usual response, when asked for simulations instead of measurements: “What answer do you want?”

Fair enough. Patience is my standard since I'm not getting anywhere very fast.

[TimFox]

Usually, simulations failed because some important feature(s) was not included in the simulation model.
For example, in your system, is there any consideration of EM radiation (not induction or coupling) directly from the circuit elements?

[Chet]

Why should I waste my time and other resources building a circuit which I have not thoroughly tested in a simulated environment? Why should I risk electrocuting myself for my failure to see if the circuit is dangerous?

Maybe I should have possessed lots of money so that I could purchase Ansys, or something similar, to simulate the behavior of the materials of construction in addition to their electrical properties?

I'm mainly replying to the bit, I used bold and font size increase on.

That doesn't make you sound confident, on your electronics capabilities, or much real (as in physical things, rather than just talking about it) confidence, in your free-energy thing.

If you don't want to spend any money on this idea, why discuss it here?

Surely you should be keen to build it, as soon as possible?

I wouldn't object if you offered me money contingent on not making any unreasonable demands.


I began to build it immediately prior to my eviction due to my trust having been bled dry by an embezzling former trustee who is about to be sentenced for adversely, and criminally, impacting the lives of twelve other people besides myself. But I didn't make use of all of the parameters of my own design. I took shortcuts. So, it's no surprise that it didn't work. Plus, I've learned a little bit more about how to fill in the missing details which the simulator can't provide, as in: how to attempt to segregate three distinct magnetic couplings among three sets of coils.

Now, my equipment (such as it is) is all of it in storage and all I get to do is survive to replace what my former trustee used to do which was the paying of my bills. Without ever having developed any job skills, I'm doing pretty good all things considered. And for therapy, I continue to blog and look up stuff.

But being homeless is a stressful condition in which all I ever focus on, much of the time, is how to reduce my stress factor. Having the liberty to do otherwise, would be a grand adventure. All I can do is patiently wait for that opportunity.

Sorry to inconvenience you.

[langwadt]

Fun?  Troll?  Scam?  Looking for idiots to follow you?

Any answer is a right one 

I'm surprised anyone is still trying to ask questions and use reason when it has long been clear that it' pointless and will just be countered with even more  pseudo technical word salad nonsense

See post #198.

more nonsense, now with pictures ...

[Chet]

Usually, simulations failed because some important feature(s) was not included in the simulation model.
For example, in your system, is there any consideration of EM radiation (not induction or coupling) directly from the circuit elements?

Yes, it's to be expected. That's why I attempted a reduction of nodal voltages. Please see the subfolder...

/max acceleration for a 2002 RAV4EV/Di-Electric Cage/

... within "examples.zip" attachment.

[Chet]

Fun?  Troll?  Scam?  Looking for idiots to follow you?

Any answer is a right one 

I'm surprised anyone is still trying to ask questions and use reason when it has long been clear that it' pointless and will just be countered with even more  pseudo technical word salad nonsense

See post #198.

more nonsense, now with pictures ...

...and citations.

[MK14]

I began to build it immediately prior to my eviction due to my trust having been bled dry by an embezzling former trustee who is about to be sentenced for adversely, and criminally, impacting the lives of twelve other people besides myself. But I didn't make use of all of the parameters of my own design. I took shortcuts. So, it's no surprise that it didn't work. Plus, I've learned a little bit more about how to fill in the missing details which the simulator can't provide, as in: how to attempt to segregate three distinct magnetic couplings among three sets of coils.

Now, my equipment (such as it is) is all of it in storage and all I get to do is survive to replace what my former trustee used to do which was the paying of my bills. Without ever having developed any job skills, I'm doing pretty good all things considered. And for therapy, I continue to blog and look up stuff.

But being homeless is a stressful condition in which all I ever focus on, much of the time, is how to reduce my stress factor. Having the liberty to do otherwise, would be a grand adventure. All I can do is patiently wait for that opportunity.

Sorry to inconvenience you.

I'd suggest, you either put it (free-energy circuit) on the back-burner (waiting pile), for now, or even forget it, altogether.

But instead, concentrate on bettering your situation, and resolving the homeless situation.

My attempts on getting you to build the circuit.  Was so that you could find out the answer, who was/is right?, you or just about (or all) of the posters, in this thread.

As with many inventions.  My understanding is that successful inventors, only tell people about the MK40 version, or however many iterations/prototypes/experiments, were needed to finally come up with a working and successful invention.

E.g. IIRC, WD40, was in real-terms the 40th experiment.  Water Displacement Experiment number 40, hence WD40.

Also if you do end up inventing anything, I doubt it will be a free-energy device.

[Xena E]

Look, if you think that a particular circuit, is going to produce free-energy.

Don't make a 7+ page thread about it (***Too late!), make one and see if it works.

Simulators, don't really count, as they are not normally 100% reliable.  Especially if using them in funny ways, such as trying to create free-energy.

Why should I waste my time and other resources building a circuit which I have not thoroughly tested in a simulated environment? Why should I risk electrocuting myself for my failure to see if the circuit is dangerous?

Maybe I should have possessed lots of money so that I could purchase Ansys, or something similar, to simulate the behavior of the materials of construction in addition to their electrical properties?

Sorry, what have I missed?

So we've gone from a claimed practical energy amplifying device that has been proven working in 2014, to a theoretical, unproven device, that although simple as a presented schematic, you're not prepared to build to prove your integrity, because of: [insert sob story] ?

Why the pages and pages of text? This has gone from barely plausible to incredible to plainly disturbing.

Why are you promoting the work that you have initially claimed as being the prior art of others as your own, and claiming what is basically energy theft as some kind of over unity device?

If someone else holds patent or design registration why are you even bothering? What is your angle?

Just put up your Fundly/Go Fund Me page link if you want to scam people, and stop digging yourself further into that big pile of bullshit... or go see a doctor about your delusions if you actually believe all this crap will work; it isn't healthy.

X

[joeqsmith]

Fun?  Troll?  Scam?  Looking for idiots to follow you?

Any answer is a right one 

I'm surprised anyone is still trying to ask questions and use reason when it has long been clear that it' pointless and will just be countered with even more  pseudo technical word salad nonsense

Because it takes little effort on my part and may provide further entertainment.  The return yields on my investments are lower than the banks current interest rates... 

[Chet]

I began to build it immediately prior to my eviction due to my trust having been bled dry by an embezzling former trustee who is about to be sentenced for adversely, and criminally, impacting the lives of twelve other people besides myself. But I didn't make use of all of the parameters of my own design. I took shortcuts. So, it's no surprise that it didn't work. Plus, I've learned a little bit more about how to fill in the missing details which the simulator can't provide, as in: how to attempt to segregate three distinct magnetic couplings among three sets of coils.

Now, my equipment (such as it is) is all of it in storage and all I get to do is survive to replace what my former trustee used to do which was the paying of my bills. Without ever having developed any job skills, I'm doing pretty good all things considered. And for therapy, I continue to blog and look up stuff.

But being homeless is a stressful condition in which all I ever focus on, much of the time, is how to reduce my stress factor. Having the liberty to do otherwise, would be a grand adventure. All I can do is patiently wait for that opportunity.

Sorry to inconvenience you.

I'd suggest, you either put it (free-energy circuit) on the back-burner (waiting pile), for now, or even forget it, altogether.

But instead, concentrate on bettering your situation, and resolving the homeless situation.

Somebody rear-ended me. So, I'm on a paid vacation of sorts and can afford to blog non-stop.
I don't develop these circuits anymore, not under simulation nor otherwise. What I've shared with you is old news to me and therapeutic for me.

My attempts on getting you to build the circuit.  Was so that you could find out the answer, who was/is right?, you or just about (or all) of the posters, in this thread.

Thanks.

As with many inventions.  My understanding is that successful inventors, only tell people about the MK40 version, or however many iterations/prototypes/experiments, were needed to finally come up with a working and successful invention.

E.g. IIRC, WD40, was in real-terms the 40th experiment.  Water Displacement Experiment number 40, hence WD40.

These simulations constitute my WD40th of my simulation development.

Also if you do end up inventing anything, I doubt it will be a free-energy device.

It's worth repeating myself that the term of "free energy" shall remain a populist sentiment since your doubts are what fuels the mindset of the software engineers who craft these SPICE simulators to look at the end result, namely: the work which results from the application of energy as if it were equivalent to the energy which has been applied to achieve that amount of work and render the result in terms of the energy expenditure as if energy versus work always remain at a fixed linear relationship. Hence, the need for being more precise by saying "the efficiency of the application of energy to achieve more work using less energy". That's why COP is a coefficient of performance, namely: the achievement of work, rather than the more familiar term of "energy efficiency". COP can easily go over 100% (heat pumps often do) while energy efficiency cannot.

[Someone]

Why the pages and pages of text? This has gone from barely plausible to incredible to plainly disturbing.

Smells like the start of a very very long con. Possibly using all the replies of how it can't work as twisted proof of how genius the idea is?

[joeqsmith]

Redrawn with outside loop and magical backdoor connection, because apparently SPICE does not consider it all the same node.  I've used SPICE since a VAX 11-780, and never knew this.   So thanks for that education Chet.

[Chet]

Look, if you think that a particular circuit, is going to produce free-energy.

Don't make a 7+ page thread about it (***Too late!), make one and see if it works.

Simulators, don't really count, as they are not normally 100% reliable.  Especially if using them in funny ways, such as trying to create free-energy.

Why should I waste my time and other resources building a circuit which I have not thoroughly tested in a simulated environment? Why should I risk electrocuting myself for my failure to see if the circuit is dangerous?

Maybe I should have possessed lots of money so that I could purchase Ansys, or something similar, to simulate the behavior of the materials of construction in addition to their electrical properties?

Sorry, what have I missed?

So we've gone from a claimed practical energy amplifying device that has been proven working in 2014, to a theoretical, unproven device, that although simple as a presented schematic, you're not prepared to build to prove your integrity, because of: [insert sob story] ?

Why the pages and pages of text? This has gone from barely plausible to incredible to plainly disturbing.

Why are you promoting the work that you have initially claimed as being the prior art of others as your own, and claiming what is basically energy theft as some kind of over unity device?

If someone else holds patent or design registration why are you even bothering? What is your angle?

Just put up your Fundly/Go Fund Me page link if you want to scam people, and stop digging yourself further into that big pile of bullshit... or go see a doctor about your delusions if you actually believe all this crap will work; it isn't healthy.

X

I sought a patent in 2018 or 2019. So, at least of that date, no one else had patented this. That's as far as I got with help from patent attorneys due to my limited funds. Then I went and submitted my patent application without their help. Initially, the US Patent Office granted me a utility patent. Then they withdrew their grant claiming a clerical typo. Shortly afterwards, someone contacted me for advice on how to build it since they were interested in its development having read about its recent publication by the Patent Office prior to it being withdrawn. But I had to decline his offer since I had no clue how to build it. At least now I have a slightly better sense, but with the reservation that I still lack expertise in the area of physical technicalities.

I already have a Patreon page, plus Venmo and PayPal.

The SERPS technology belongs to Jim Murray and Paul Babcock.

The Golden Ratio circuit of mathematically precise mutual inductances is my affair.

[MK14]

Can someone help me?

Please OP, don't reply to this post.

Question:
The OP's, responses, seem to be changing their story, between, many of their posts.

All I can easily think might be happening to explain this would be:
Each answer is being made up, each time.
Alternatively, some kind of mental illness, under some kind of influence, or perhaps trolling?

[langwadt]

Can someone help me?

Please OP, don't reply to this post.

Question:
The OP's, responses, seem to be changing their story, between, many of their posts.

All I can easily think might be happening to explain this would be:
Each answer is being made up, each time.
Alternatively, some kind of mental illness, under some kind of influence, or perhaps trolling?

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe%27s_Law

[Bud]

Of course trolling, and you guys keep taking the bait.

[Analog Kid]

Of course trolling, and you guys keep taking the bait.

I don't think so.
Whatever else the OP is, I'm pretty sure they're sincere about all this. Horribly mixed up, misled, chasing down rabbit holes, but quite serious about the whole thing.

What would they possibly be scamming anyone for? No requests for money, no requests for anything that I can see, just their continued assertions that they're onto something here.

[MK14]

What would they possibly be scamming anyone for? No requests for money, no requests for anything that I can see, just their continued assertions that they're onto something here.

I already have a Patreon page.

[MK14]

Can someone help me?

Please OP, don't reply to this post.

Question:
The OP's, responses, seem to be changing their story, between, many of their posts.

All I can easily think might be happening to explain this would be:
Each answer is being made up, each time.
Alternatively, some kind of mental illness, under some kind of influence, or perhaps trolling?

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe%27s_Law

Thanks, yes a good point.  A bit like when a colour-blind person, can tell there is a coloured section.  But they can't tell which of two particular colours, it actually is.

I suppose a forum troll, is a (human operated/created) emulation of a proper forum poster.  Making them difficult to tell apart.

[Chet]

The golden ratio, and its properties, is so remarkable (magical as some would claim), that three sets of five coils which are self-shorted and shorted to each other by a single connection is enough to induce an explosive SPICE simulation from a limited (paltry) input of voltage.

Obviously, this circuit is not an over unity, free energy, circuit since it severely drains the voltage sine source. Yet, it does demonstrate how it is possible to achieve explosive results by merely using the properties of the golden ratio and lots of self-shorting going on among five coils to challenge conventional wisdom on what it takes to achieve the parasitic amplification of current originating from a low level of input voltage.

[langwadt]

Can someone help me?

Please OP, don't reply to this post.

Question:
The OP's, responses, seem to be changing their story, between, many of their posts.

All I can easily think might be happening to explain this would be:
Each answer is being made up, each time.
Alternatively, some kind of mental illness, under some kind of influence, or perhaps trolling?

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe%27s_Law

Thanks, yes a good point.  A bit like when a colour-blind person, can tell there is a coloured section.  But they can't tell which of two particular colours, it actually is.

I suppose a forum troll, is a (human operated/created) emulation of a proper forum poster.  Making them difficult to tell apart.

this part seems to fit perfectly "Poe's law applies not only to the absurdity of beliefs, but also to the absurdity of the arguments that are used on behalf of those beliefs."