Author Topic: Siglent SDS2000X Plus  (Read 743535 times)

Paul_GD and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline blurpy

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 233
  • Country: no
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2800 on: September 10, 2021, 07:23:45 pm »
:-+ You did well. Maybe it is my mistake... age catches up quickly in Covid times. I used to parse those things but I think it stopped at the X-E...
Thanks :)
Ah, your parser is pretty impressive! I have some work ahead of me  ;D
 

Offline Peter_O

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 421
  • Country: de
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2801 on: September 11, 2021, 10:49:52 am »
I've just upgraded a 'fully optioned and fully bandwidthed' one from 1.3.7R5 to 1.3.9R4 without any issues and it seems to work fine at a first glance. 

Just wondering how to configure a network share.
Under I/O-Settings / Net Storage there is a directory to be configured.
Suppose it should be an UNC path, but there is no "\" available on the virtual keyboard.
I'd like to access a share like: \\fritz.box\FRITZ.NAS\Dokumente\Share_Siglent

Tried with just the IP-address as directory and credentials, leading into "Mount directory error. ..." Trying again gives this error again and the system then hung completely. Only a power cycle helped.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2021, 11:04:53 am by Peter_O »
 

Online 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6710
  • Country: hr
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2802 on: September 11, 2021, 10:51:49 am »
Linux uses /
 
The following users thanked this post: Peter_O

Offline Peter_O

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 421
  • Country: de
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2803 on: September 11, 2021, 11:09:16 am »
Linux uses /

Sorry. Windows-blindness.   :palm:     :-[

thx a lot. Works like a charm now.
 
The following users thanked this post: 2N3055

Offline blurpy

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 233
  • Country: no
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2804 on: September 11, 2021, 07:15:25 pm »
Don´t know what I´ve meausured before, now I got appx 650ps too.

Seems like my results are slightly faster, but also looks like worse overshoot. Did you check how much overshoot you got?

 

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5875
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2805 on: September 11, 2021, 08:18:19 pm »
Hi,

Quote
Did you check how much overshoot you got?

Didn´t know it anymore, can check it tomorrow.
Checked the bodnar also on a lecroy 500Mhz waverunner, it´s overshoots are slightly less.

 
The following users thanked this post: blurpy

Offline kcbrown

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 880
  • Country: us
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2806 on: September 12, 2021, 02:08:59 am »
Hi,

Quote
Did you check how much overshoot you got?

Didn´t know it anymore, can check it tomorrow.
Checked the bodnar also on a lecroy 500Mhz waverunner, it´s overshoots are slightly less.

What does each scope show when you turn off sinc, to show the raw sample points?  Also, are both in peak detect or normal mode?  If normal, it would be interesting to see if they're closer when peak detect is enabled on both.
 

Offline rf-loop

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4107
  • Country: fi
  • Born in Finland with DLL21 in hand
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2807 on: September 12, 2021, 05:23:55 am »
Also, are both in peak detect or normal mode?
Basic fundamentals:
With full ADC sampling rate (without decimation) Peak detect have no effect, of course.
As you can see all these, least as far as I can see, have done with full sampling speed.
I drive a LEC (low el. consumption) BEV car. Smoke exhaust pipes - go to museum. In Finland quite all electric power is made using nuclear, wind, solar and water.

Wises must compel the mad barbarians to stop their crimes against humanity. Where have the wises gone?
 

Offline kcbrown

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 880
  • Country: us
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2808 on: September 12, 2021, 06:49:48 am »
Also, are both in peak detect or normal mode?
Basic fundamentals:
With full ADC sampling rate (without decimation) Peak detect have no effect, of course.
As you can see all these, least as far as I can see, have done with full sampling speed.

Oh.  You're right.  Good call.

It would be interesting to see the raw points for both, in case there's a difference in the sinc construction method being used.
 

Offline movie

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 5
  • Country: at
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2809 on: September 12, 2021, 07:36:12 am »
The last FW update has about half the size oft the preceding updates.
Thats interesting ?
 

Offline rf-loop

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4107
  • Country: fi
  • Born in Finland with DLL21 in hand
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2810 on: September 12, 2021, 08:50:38 am »
The last FW update has about half the size oft the preceding updates.
Thats interesting ?

No problem. All help/language files what have no changes do not need update.
« Last Edit: September 12, 2021, 08:52:26 am by rf-loop »
I drive a LEC (low el. consumption) BEV car. Smoke exhaust pipes - go to museum. In Finland quite all electric power is made using nuclear, wind, solar and water.

Wises must compel the mad barbarians to stop their crimes against humanity. Where have the wises gone?
 

Offline thinkfat

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2152
  • Country: de
  • This is just a hobby I spend too much time on.
    • Matthias' Hackerstübchen
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2811 on: September 12, 2021, 09:18:16 am »
But that means it's not a cumulative update, but requires a certain minimum version to build upon?
Everybody likes gadgets. Until they try to make them.
 
The following users thanked this post: Martin72

Online 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6710
  • Country: hr
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2812 on: September 12, 2021, 10:36:44 am »
But that means it's not a cumulative update, but requires a certain minimum version to build upon?

It's not like you can buy empty scope without OS like with PC-s..
If you see problem with someone not upgrading for 10 years, yeah you might need some interim upgrades.
That is not something unusual.
Might be inconvenient in that case, but not a show stopper. It simply needs to be documented.
And most of the people upgrade on regular base anyways.
 

Offline blurpy

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 233
  • Country: no
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2813 on: September 12, 2021, 10:46:38 am »
What does each scope show when you turn off sinc, to show the raw sample points?  Also, are both in peak detect or normal mode?  If normal, it would be interesting to see if they're closer when peak detect is enabled on both.

Here are from mine with sinc off. I could not see any difference with peak detect or not. Also checked both AC and DC coupling without any difference.

Fast mode:



And slow mode:

 

Offline blurpy

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 233
  • Country: no
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2814 on: September 12, 2021, 10:59:39 am »
If you see problem with someone not upgrading for 10 years, yeah you might need some interim upgrades.
That is not something unusual.
Might be inconvenient in that case, but not a show stopper. It simply needs to be documented.
Should definitely be documented. I added it in the bug thread.
 

Online 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6710
  • Country: hr
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2815 on: September 12, 2021, 11:14:16 am »
What does each scope show when you turn off sinc, to show the raw sample points?  Also, are both in peak detect or normal mode?  If normal, it would be interesting to see if they're closer when peak detect is enabled on both.

Here are from mine with sinc off. I could not see any difference with peak detect or not. Also checked both AC and DC coupling without any difference.

Fast mode:



And slow mode:



Best way to look at fast repetitive signals is by using dot mode. It will , in effect, act as a sort  of an ETS mode and show much better signal fidelity.
Try it.

Like RF-loop said, peak detect is not working at all at max sample rate. Which, because of long mem, you will keep to quite long timebases.
 

Offline thinkfat

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2152
  • Country: de
  • This is just a hobby I spend too much time on.
    • Matthias' Hackerstübchen
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2816 on: September 12, 2021, 11:28:17 am »
But that means it's not a cumulative update, but requires a certain minimum version to build upon?

It's not like you can buy empty scope without OS like with PC-s..
If you see problem with someone not upgrading for 10 years, yeah you might need some interim upgrades.
That is not something unusual.
Might be inconvenient in that case, but not a show stopper. It simply needs to be documented.
And most of the people upgrade on regular base anyways.

In principle it's OK, but what it saves in download bandwidth is easily outweighed by the inconvenience of having to download multiple versions and applying them in the correct order. If I were Siglent, I'd distribute full firmware updates only.

Having an update mechanism that enforces dependencies on previous firmware versions is pretty much mandatory in that case. Merely documenting that you need to install all previous updates is not enough. It only leads to customer frustration and an increase in support tickets.

Can anyone confirm that it's impossible to install this latest firmware on a scope with an older firmware than the previous version?
Everybody likes gadgets. Until they try to make them.
 

Offline blurpy

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 233
  • Country: no
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2817 on: September 12, 2021, 11:39:39 am »
Can anyone confirm that it's impossible to install this latest firmware on a scope with an older firmware than the previous version?
The update instructions say it's compatible from 1.3.5R5. You get the newest app in any case, but the supporting files will be "old", like documentation.
 

Offline Billy33

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 8
  • Country: us
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2818 on: September 12, 2021, 11:45:25 am »
A bit offtopic but just popped up after i did some play around after successfully updated to the latest FW:

Is there a way to load the waveform data of the Bode plot also? Neither the Webinterface not the EasyScopeX SW downloads correct data. Csv can be saved locally via dialog, but then you have to operate the USB stick all the time.
 

Offline blurpy

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 233
  • Country: no
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2819 on: September 12, 2021, 11:59:52 am »
Best way to look at fast repetitive signals is by using dot mode. It will , in effect, act as a sort  of an ETS mode and show much better signal fidelity.
Try it.
Tried it now :)



 

Offline rf-loop

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4107
  • Country: fi
  • Born in Finland with DLL21 in hand
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2820 on: September 12, 2021, 12:54:29 pm »
Best way to look at fast repetitive signals is by using dot mode. It will , in effect, act as a sort  of an ETS mode and show much better signal fidelity.
Try it.
Tried it now :)





This is somehow best reconstruction about your signal how ADC see it and best what this instrument can.
Naturally no one know what it is in source output without connected to oscilloscope and also when connected no one know how it change from oscilloscope input port (BNC) and when it travel to ADC input.

As can see this figure shape can also very perfectly find in image where is lines with Sinc Off. When know how to look.



« Last Edit: September 12, 2021, 01:01:09 pm by rf-loop »
I drive a LEC (low el. consumption) BEV car. Smoke exhaust pipes - go to museum. In Finland quite all electric power is made using nuclear, wind, solar and water.

Wises must compel the mad barbarians to stop their crimes against humanity. Where have the wises gone?
 
The following users thanked this post: blurpy

Offline Peter_O

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 421
  • Country: de
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2821 on: September 12, 2021, 01:14:18 pm »
Does anybody know the maximum power of the 50 Ohm input resistors?
Is there any input protection in place?

I'm thinking of following the performance checks from the HP8015A pulse generator manual and HP recommends a 20db power attenuator.
HP8015A output voltage is max +/- 8V into 50 Ohms.
 

Online 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6710
  • Country: hr
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2822 on: September 12, 2021, 01:16:40 pm »
Does anybody know the maximum power of the 50 Ohm input resistors?
Is there any input protection in place?

I'm thinking of following the performance checks from the HP8015A pulse generator manual and HP recommends a 20db power attenuator.
HP8015A output voltage is max +/- 8V into 50 Ohms.

There is maximum input voltage specified, as written right next to BNC: < 5VRMS at 50 Ohms
+/-8V  squarewave is 8V RMS...
So attenuator is in order..
A 6dB (power, /2 in voltage) attenuator will drop it to 4V RMS an 4V P-P, well into range.
« Last Edit: September 12, 2021, 01:24:50 pm by 2N3055 »
 
The following users thanked this post: Peter_O

Offline bobof

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 36
  • Country: gb
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2823 on: September 13, 2021, 09:01:09 am »
Just "upgraded" to latest version...
Some nice features (like "full span" on the FFT).
A few gripes...
Any way to reduce the absolutely ridiculous fixed 4 decimal places of "precision" that the trace axis seem to have gained for horizontal and vertical scales in the last release (or maybe the one before that) - I'm particularly looking at the FFT?  And why does the FFT information now move out of the corner of the screen...
 

Offline Peter_O

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 421
  • Country: de
Re: Siglent SDS2000X Plus
« Reply #2824 on: September 13, 2021, 11:17:47 am »
Does anybody know the maximum power of the 50 Ohm input resistors?
Is there any input protection in place?

I'm thinking of following the performance checks from the HP8015A pulse generator manual and HP recommends a 20db power attenuator.
HP8015A output voltage is max +/- 8V into 50 Ohms.

There is maximum input voltage specified, as written right next to BNC: < 5VRMS at 50 Ohms
+/-8V  squarewave is 8V RMS...
So attenuator is in order..
A 6dB (power, /2 in voltage) attenuator will drop it to 4V RMS an 4V P-P, well into range.

Thx 2N3055! Advantage for those able to read.  :-[

Will order some attenuators to fill my TEA beginner's drawers.   :-)
 
The following users thanked this post: 2N3055


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf