I already spot some truly good uses for ChatGPT. Replace the interviewer. After all he does is nothing more than giving Nadella excuses to deliver what boils down to a well-prepared speech.
MBA exams are supposed to be easy. It is a tool to part people with their money. Only rich people go for it and you can't make exams to hard, or you will fail most of your target audience.
Have you seen the English proficiency tests for entrance?
Have you seen the English proficiency tests for entrance?
There is no way I would be passing those tests, and honestly it feels like the design of the test makes it so that foreign students would have no chance of passing.
I just checked and got the "ChatGPT is at capacity right now" message. I'm sure I've been there in the past month without problems so I guess it's not based on location but on luck.
But it is nothing more than mimicking. ChatGPT would accept and agree to your corrections, even if your corrections are completely wrong.
I just checked and got the "ChatGPT is at capacity right now" message. I'm sure I've been there in the past month without problems so I guess it's not based on location but on luck.It got national news coverage on a major news network in the USA this morning, several times, so perhaps it's becoming even more popular now.
BTW how was anyone able to access ChatGPT recently? It always throws a "we are overlaoded, sorry" error whenever I try to access it in the past month. Is this location based?
Why ask a question in Google and then have to search through various resources and weight up their relevance just to get your answer. Let the AI do that.
Sure, right up until the humans start creating web pages specifically to game the AI system.
Of course. Humans already game the Google system.
The "AI" will be an additional layer of opacity, though.
I already spot some truly good uses for ChatGPT. Replace the interviewer. After all he does is nothing more than giving Nadella excuses to deliver what boils down to a well-prepared speech.
I feel sad, that the discourse is bouncing between overhyping and fearmongering. Something, that may provide a philosophical shift comparable to theories of evolution, is degraded to such a low topic.
Actually, I was thinking about the possible uses on how this can change our society into something better (I know, right)?
One of the biggest issue IMHO we are facing now is the post-truth society. Fake news and political polarization is a huge issue, and people can live their lives in an echo chamber. The political right and the left both seems to have taken a anti-scientific stance, where they just don't follow scientific evidence. So I asked our robot (which wasn't overloaded tonight, only very slow) if it can do this. It's really reluctant to say that it can detect fake news. And I know the training data ended in 2021 September. But I cannot help but wonder if this can be used to fix this issue. Or if it will make things even worse, since the repeated propaganda pieces will train the model with bad data, and it has no way of distinguishing it from real news.
I don't think it will either destroy nor revolutionize society. Back in the 60s people were fretting that synthesizers were going to ruin music, they didn't, they just created new genres of music, people still play traditional instruments.
I clearly can't even see what is a general aim with a strong AI, apart from "it might will have some good uses". As if it would be some intended God or religion substitution for some. Who is going to doublecheck
the results of the ultimate wisedome? Or what is 42?
I clearly can't even see what is a general aim with a strong AI, apart from "it might will have some good uses". As if it would be some intended God or religion substitution for some. Who is going to doublecheck
the results of the ultimate wisedome? Or what is 42? (…)
Sometimes it would be also nice to ask, what is the actualy aim of technical advancement, what do we want to achieve? Is it achievable through technical advancements? Did we get closer to what we wanted in the last....50 years? Or 150?
Actually, I was thinking about the possible uses on how this can change our society into something better (I know, right)?
One of the biggest issue IMHO we are facing now is the post-truth society. Fake news and political polarization is a huge issue, and people can live their lives in an echo chamber. The political right and the left both seems to have taken a anti-scientific stance, where they just don't follow scientific evidence. So I asked our robot (which wasn't overloaded tonight, only very slow) if it can do this. It's really reluctant to say that it can detect fake news. And I know the training data ended in 2021 September. But I cannot help but wonder if this can be used to fix this issue. Or if it will make things even worse, since the repeated propaganda pieces will train the model with bad data, and it has no way of distinguishing it from real news.
I don't think it will either destroy nor revolutionize society. Back in the 60s people were fretting that synthesizers were going to ruin music, they didn't, they just created new genres of music, people still play traditional instruments.
A better analogy might be Guitar Hero.
Guitar Hero hasn't ruined music either, it's a video game, not a simulator. Nobody goes to Guitar Hero concerts.
One of the biggest issue IMHO we are facing now is the post-truth society.