If you use a HD camera you need a reasonably fast PC to handle the data if you want to edit video.
I use a Nikon D3200 with the kit lens and its worked out GREAT for me! Just NEEDS an external mic or external mic input.. but that is ANY DSLR (for video)
google my username (same there) to see some videos I've made explaining it (I'm a sound tecnician by trade).
That information is true... but a little out of date..
The latest generations are cheaper, easier to use and have been designed to help the video side of things too..
If you use a HD camera you need a reasonably fast PC to handle the data if you want to edit video.
Yes and no..
With certain programs like sony vegas, it will reduce the preview quality to suit the machine in which it is running.
But with out a doubt, the final render speed is very processor and data transfer related.
I use a Nikon D3200 with the kit lens and its worked out GREAT for me! Just NEEDS an external mic or external mic input.. but that is ANY DSLR (for video)
google my username (same there) to see some videos I've made explaining it (I'm a sound tecnician by trade).
Yes, some newer ones have better video functionality. But virtually every camcorder, including the el-cheapo $200 ones still beat any DSLR in usability terms.
No one has yet shown me a single DLSR on the market that meets all the basic capability of even an el-cheapo camcorder.
Unless you shoot a lot of video, you won't know that the subtle things can make a big difference. DSLR's still do not cut the mustard as an everyday camcorder replacement.
Dave.
Depends on what you're doing. I've seen blog posts done that look fantastic with simple hd webcams
Depends on what you're doing. I've seen blog posts done that look fantastic with simple hd webcams
If you have good enough light and angle, you can get good HD video quality with almost anything, webcam, phone, $50 point-and-shoot camera or whatever.
But I simply wouldn't be able to do my show if I was tied to a webcam.
Dave.
6) Most can't take extended battery packs
I use a Nikon D3200 with the kit lens and its worked out GREAT for me! Just NEEDS an external mic or external mic input.. but that is ANY DSLR (for video)
google my username (same there) to see some videos I've made explaining it (I'm a sound tecnician by trade).
Ergh, forgot DSLR if you are doing serious video blog stuff.
It's fine for shooting a month long doco if you have forever to muck around and need very shallow depth of field and specific shots etc.
But if you just want to shoot video without fuss, get a proper camcorder.
Disadvantages of DSLR's vs camcorders:
1) Many don't have full articulated (tilt/swivel screen), useless for in front of or top of camera work
2) Many don't have external mic inputs (useless)
3) Few if any have proper on-screen audio level meter
4) They are hopeless at maintaining auto-focus
5) Inconvenient with playback and general video operation.
6) Most can't take extended battery packs
7) Many can only shoot for limited periods of time (10-20min?)
Advanced features like peaking and zebra stripes
And there are others I'm sure I can't think of at the moment.
I would not trade my camcorder for even the best $10K DSLR, my video shooting productivity would instantly drop to zero, and the hassle factor would go through the roof.
Dave.
I wouldn't avoid a camera just because it doesn't have a microphone input.
It's quite easy to record additional sound using some standalone mp3 recorder or whatever, you just need to add the sound during editing to the original clip. Use one of those things that makes it easy for you to match the sound to video, also called a slate or a clapboard:
Yeah, it adds a bit of additional work but cameras without mic input are often cheaper, might be worth it