Postulate this: If a tungsten light bulb filament gives off black body radiation how do they make black light bulbs (the woods glass type) and "halogen" lights that give off UV? The UV catastrophe problem says that you can't do that. I have a feeling "black light" may not be UV but rather extreme purple that our eyes can't see, but its still color light right before the photon has enough keV to ionize. This would be the same trick in woods glass fluorescent black light tubes, as the envelope would have to be quartz to let out UV, or does silica glass pass UVA just fine? Wouldn't the best black light be a fluorescent quartz glass tube with a UVB/C filter that also cuts most of the shorter UVA wave lengths?
Fun Story, my bed room as a kid had four 4' black lights on the edge of the ceiling with tin foil reflectors on the wall. The room looked normal day or night, but when you turned on the black lights you could see the walls were painted in laundry detergent antifreeze, dilute highlighters, and some other toxic chemicals that look clear under normal light. We used to give our friends way too many hits of LSD or mushrooms bring them in the room they saw many times in ordinary light, then turn on the black lights and watch their minds explode!!! Wish I had pictures film cameras didn't show that stuff well or rather not easily like a digital camera would.
The simple answer is that "woods lamps" are not incandescent at all. They are gas discharge lamps with an integrated incandescent ballast.
See video here:
https://youtu.be/aBrLeOVBCaE?t=4m0s
Incandescent lamps do emit a tiny amount of UV. The higher the filament temperature, the more UV they'll emit, at the expense of a shorter life.
Ordinary glass passes UVA pretty well. It just blocks the shorter UVB and UVC wavelengths, which is good for protecting the eyes and skin.
The shorter visible wavelengths, blue, indigo and violet, cause fluorescence at longer wavelengths: green, yellow, orange and red. In fact the longer end of the visible spectrum will excite fluorescence to some degree but it will be infrared.
Digital cameras respond poorly to UV but I don't know how they compare to colour film. Old back and white film will respond in the UV but camera lenses filter it out.
The mid to lower end of the UV spectrum, is not ionising. Incandescent lamps do not emit and ionising radiation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionizing_radiation#Definition_boundary_for_lower-energy_photons
Agree. Those cheap tungsten UV lights run hot and live short lives. Produce little UV. And usually have some sort of filter to block the IR and visible which is produced in far greater quantities. It would be interesting to know if this is some sort of absorption filter or a cheaply produced interference filter. My bet is for the absorption type.
Remember, while there is a peak wavelength for each temperature of emitter, and the reduction in intensity beyond the peak is why the UV catastrophe doesn't occur, there is no wavelength that has zero output, no matter what the temperature. You just have to use lots of zeros to describe it.
Yeah, the UV side of the curve drops off exponentially, or something like that. So there's a nonzero chance of, say, receiving a 1keV photon from room-temperature material..... it's just "impossible" (10^-100 likelihood, say).
Tim
Agree. Those cheap tungsten UV lights run hot and live short lives. Produce little UV. And usually have some sort of filter to block the IR and visible which is produced in far greater quantities. It would be interesting to know if this is some sort of absorption filter or a cheaply produced interference filter. My bet is for the absorption type.
Remember, while there is a peak wavelength for each temperature of emitter, and the reduction in intensity beyond the peak is why the UV catastrophe doesn't occur, there is no wavelength that has zero output, no matter what the temperature. You just have to use lots of zeros to describe it.
They use Wood's glass, which passes infrared, UVA and some violet and a tiny amount of far red.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood%27s_glasshttps://www.uqgoptics.com/materials_filters_schott_uvTransmitting_UG1.aspx
Agree. Those cheap tungsten UV lights run hot and live short lives. Produce little UV. And usually have some sort of filter to block the IR and visible which is produced in far greater quantities. It would be interesting to know if this is some sort of absorption filter or a cheaply produced interference filter. My bet is for the absorption type.
Remember, while there is a peak wavelength for each temperature of emitter, and the reduction in intensity beyond the peak is why the UV catastrophe doesn't occur, there is no wavelength that has zero output, no matter what the temperature. You just have to use lots of zeros to describe it.
They use Wood's glass, which passes infrared, UVA and some violet and a tiny amount of far red.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood%27s_glass
https://www.uqgoptics.com/materials_filters_schott_uvTransmitting_UG1.aspx
I thought you were Hero999 not Zero999 Did you change it while I was on holiday? Or am I losing my mind?
Yes, I changed it while you were away around Christmas time.
From Hero to Zero ...
Quagmire:
"Hey lady, why don't you ditch the zero and go home with a hero?" He then gets punched in the face.
"Alright!"
I'm glad someone noticed I was gone, I bet people were like "Ahhhhh, so nice and quiet here, no stupid questions or repetitive posts followed by apologies and excuses."
Zero99 is a cooler name I think.
Yes, I thought Hero was a bit narcissistic. I can't remember why I chose it in the first place. I've been unhappy with it for awhile, but stuck with it because I didn't know it could be changed without closing my old account and opening a new one. Recently, I learned it's possible to change my name, with the permission of a moderator, so I did.
Yes, I thought Hero was a bit narcissistic. I can't remember why I chose it in the first place. I've been unhappy with it for awhile, but stuck with it because I didn't know it could be changed without closing my old account and opening a new one. Recently, I learned it's possible to change my name, with the permission of a moderator, so I did.
If only doing it in real life was that easy. Its actually easier to change your gender on your birth cert. then your name. It depends on the sate but you don't even need documentation from your doctor, you just say "I identify as this sex now" and they change it. Which is great because some people live as females but don't want to have surgery, like myself. Has nothing to do with the state you currently reside in. So if you were born in some shithole state like Mississippi, you can move away but will always be affected by its laws. Of course you could always delete your account in real life and create a new one but that only works if you are Buddhist.
A good example of an incandescent lamp that emits UV is the sun (which has an equivalent black body temperature of 5778 K)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black-body_radiationThe black line represents what classical mechanics intuitively would predict, which obviously didn't agree with measurements. That problem was called the UV catastrophe.
The solution was to make some, for the time, rather strange assumptions. They were the first clue to modern quantum physics and thus are very important historically. Those assumptions give a so called black body radiation spectra which agrees perfectly with measurements. The other lines show black body radiation spectra for different temperatures. As can be seen in this graph that means there is a fair amount of UV from the sun (most of which is blocked by the ozone layer).
This is an example of the type of lamp I was talking about:
http://pen-ray.uvp.com/highintensitylamps.htmlIt is a 90 W lamp, with an irradiance of 8500 uW/cm
2 at 2 inches. It is a gas-discharge lamp with an incandescent ballast (gas discharge lamps have negative resistance and require ballasts to limit current consumption). The user can tell this immediately, because the UV output doesn't begin until the lamp has been "lit" and warming up for about 30 seconds. The bulb also has a safety cutout to prevent hot striking and so it may shut off during use, which is not true of incandescents.
I actually took a spectrum from a "Black Light Bulb" purchased at Wal-Mart in the US during the halloween season. I wanted to compare it to LED and fluorescent versions. Turns out...not black light at all. Not even trying.
I thought I recalled black light incandescent bulbs actually working (causing fluorescence in fabrics, dyes) back in the 1980s. Now this one at least is a huge fake.
I'm attaching the spectrum.
This is an example of the type of lamp I was talking about:
http://pen-ray.uvp.com/highintensitylamps.html
It is a 90 W lamp, with an irradiance of 8500 uW/cm2 at 2 inches. It is a gas-discharge lamp with an incandescent ballast (gas discharge lamps have negative resistance and require ballasts to limit current consumption). The user can tell this immediately, because the UV output doesn't begin until the lamp has been "lit" and warming up for about 30 seconds. The bulb also has a safety cutout to prevent hot striking and so it may shut off during use, which is not true of incandescents.
Nobody was disputing that gas-discharge UV lamps exist.
You claimed that the incandescent UV lamps must be gas discharge, and this claim is demonstrably untrue. Disproving
this claim says
nothing whatsoever about the existence of gas discharge UV lamps.
I actually took a spectrum from a "Black Light Bulb" purchased at Wal-Mart in the US during the halloween season. I wanted to compare it to LED and fluorescent versions. Turns out...not black light at all. Not even trying.
I thought I recalled black light incandescent bulbs actually working (causing fluorescence in fabrics, dyes) back in the 1980s. Now this one at least is a huge fake.
I'm attaching the spectrum.
So it was what, an incandescent heater?
Just to be clear, incandescent UV lamps are so unbelievably inefficient at UV that I wouldn‘t be surprised if the ratio of IR to UV from those exceeds the dynamic range of some measurement gear.
I actually took a spectrum from a "Black Light Bulb" purchased at Wal-Mart in the US during the halloween season. I wanted to compare it to LED and fluorescent versions. Turns out...not black light at all. Not even trying.
I thought I recalled black light incandescent bulbs actually working (causing fluorescence in fabrics, dyes) back in the 1980s. Now this one at least is a huge fake.
I'm attaching the spectrum.
So it was what, an incandescent heater?
Just to be clear, incandescent UV lamps are so unbelievably inefficient at UV that I wouldn‘t be surprised if the ratio of IR to UV from those exceeds the dynamic range of some measurement gear.
I agree.
Does this one actually cause things to fluoresce?
What colour does it appear when lit? No doubt it's cherry red, rather than the usual dim violet glow produced by real black lights, as it emits more in the deep red, than violet end of the spectrum.
I actually took a spectrum from a "Black Light Bulb" purchased at Wal-Mart in the US during the halloween season. I wanted to compare it to LED and fluorescent versions. Turns out...not black light at all. Not even trying.
I thought I recalled black light incandescent bulbs actually working (causing fluorescence in fabrics, dyes) back in the 1980s. Now this one at least is a huge fake.
I'm attaching the spectrum.
Why would you plot it on linear axes? The UV component is a few pixels here.
Tim
I actually took a spectrum from a "Black Light Bulb" purchased at Wal-Mart in the US during the halloween season. I wanted to compare it to LED and fluorescent versions. Turns out...not black light at all. Not even trying.
I thought I recalled black light incandescent bulbs actually working (causing fluorescence in fabrics, dyes) back in the 1980s. Now this one at least is a huge fake.
I'm attaching the spectrum.
Why would you plot it on linear axes? The UV component is a few pixels here.
Tim
No doubt it's the default seeting for the software connected to the spectrometer, which might not have a wide enough dynamic range to see the UV as well as the IR.
Tooki:
I showed you mine—now you show me yours.
Tooki:
I showed you mine—now you show me yours.
What are you, 10?!
I already linked to evidence in my first reply.
Tooki:
I showed you mine—now you show me yours.
I presume he doesn't have a crappy blacklight incandescent lamp. No doubt if he has or gets a blacklight, it'll be a fluorescent or LED type.
I know blacklight incandescent lamps exist. Maplin used to sell them. I have a blacklight CFL which wasn't that much more expensive and no doubt is 1000 times more efficient. The glass bulb is ordinary, uncoloured glass, coated with a blacklight filter, probably Wood's glass. The only issue is the end of the tube only has a thin layer of filter, so it produces more visible light, than a standard linear blacklight blue fluorescent tube.
I have contemplated buying a blacklight incandescent lamp, but only so I can use the glass bulb as a filter for a UV LED, as I couldn't find a cheap Wood's glass filter. In the end I didn't bother, because I'm not confident in my ability to cleanly and safely cut the base off the bulb without breaking it. I thought about trying on an ordinary incandescent lamp to practise, but I've read that Wood's glass is more difficult to work with.
More proof of existence. I dug into the bin of bad buys and came up with two brands of incandescent black light bulbs. They were originally purchased (at a second hand shop) in an attempt to come up with a cheap eraser for UVEPROMs. Yeah it was a long time ago. They didn't work. But about the same time I purchased a 6 inch fluorescent tube reputed to be UV. Which wouldn't erase the PROMs either after four hours of exposure. The incandescent bulbs give no visible sign of causing florescence even in a totally dark room, so at least for me these have been a total failure, though I don't doubt for a minute that there is some minute amount of UV emitted.
The bulbs are very similar in appearance, but one is marked as made in China, while the other is marked as made in Korea. Since these were purchased before trade relations with China were fully normalized it is possible that they were both made in China, with one having been exported first to Korea before coming to the USA.
The photograph of one of them in operation shows clearly that they are not a gas discharge bulb, but a fairly standard tungsten filament type.
These bulbs run very hot. My pyrometer shows the top of the bulb at 155 C with the sides running 95 to 100 C. Normal incandescent bulbs measured with the same pyrometer measure about 65 C on the upper surface and 40 C or so on the side. That leaves a potential application for these things as fingerprint removers.