But do not ban responses generated by ChatGPT provided the member attributes them to ChatGPT.
I say yes - ban the BOTS. But do not ban responses generated by ChatGPT provided the member attributes them to ChatGPT.
But do not ban responses generated by ChatGPT provided the member attributes them to ChatGPT.
Yes, that could become troublesome really quickly. If there was a rule that said no use of ChatGPT unless attributued then it's likely people will start reporting responses they think are ChatGPT.
But what if ChatGPT knows the meaning of life!!? How could we humans possibly ban such deep knowledge!?
I'd say ban them. They'll waste everyone's times.
Let's put it this way, if I wanted a bot to answer, I would ask a bot. I come to a forum because I want a human answer.
But what if ChatGPT knows the meaning of life!!? How could we humans possibly ban such deep knowledge!?
Since these machines feed on available information and don't really think for them selves it is not likely that this will happen
How about dogs?
"On the internet nobody knows you're a dog!"
I say yes - ban the BOTS. But do not ban responses generated by ChatGPT provided the member attributes them to ChatGPT.
If a law cannot be policed and enforced, it holds little value. Can you identify the usage of ChatGPT? It might be straightforward to detect if ChatGPT is generating all of a user's output, but would you be able to distinguish that this paragraph was composed by ChatGPT?
But what if ChatGPT knows the meaning of life!!? How could we humans possibly ban such deep knowledge!?
Since these machines feed on available information and don't really think for them selves it is not likely that this will happen
Heeey! At your place humans about to ban farmers and farming, over at my place humans about to ban CO2 and go full bore CBDC's, who said humans really think! or think "better" then AI.
If a law cannot be policed and enforced, it holds little value. Can you identify the usage of ChatGPT? It might be straightforward to detect if ChatGPT is generating all of a user's output, but would you be able to distinguish that this paragraph was composed by ChatGPT?
If a law cannot be policed and enforced, it holds little value. Can you identify the usage of ChatGPT? It might be straightforward to detect if ChatGPT is generating all of a user's output, but would you be able to distinguish that this paragraph was composed by ChatGPT?
I suspect, that if a user (for whatever reason). Made many (genuine), human posts, here. But sometimes (secretly) consulted with ChatGPT, and sometimes, either cut and pasted bits of its response(s) into their posts, or even rewrote them, to attempt to further hide, what is really going on. We wouldn't be able, to easily tell.
So I agree, it would be difficult to reliably fully enforce, such rules.
It is a bit like trying to prevent someone using a calculator, when they are given online tests and exams. It would be difficult to enforce in practice.
But what if ChatGPT knows the meaning of life!!? How could we humans possibly ban such deep knowledge!?
Since these machines feed on available information and don't really think for them selves it is not likely that this will happen
Microsoft and GM deal means your next car might talk, lie, gaslight and manipulate you
'ChatGPT is going to be in everything' says automaker
https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/14/microsoft_gm_chatgpt_car/?td=rt-3a
It will be not just this forum. If AI -human interactions on the internet won't be marked as created by an AI it will have such an effect on human communications as forged money to the financial system.
A total chaos, and degradation of human human interactions, and besically the end of the internet as we know it. You will not be able to trust anyone who you don't know personally.
Problem is, until this law will be created, a lot of valuable time will be lost. And that will be the case with every law which would try to regulate this whole issue.
As the poll says.
Vote and discuss.
It will be not just this forum. If AI -human interactions on the internet won't be marked as created by an AI it will have such an effect on human communications as forged money to the financial system.
A total chaos, and degradation of human human interactions, and besically the end of the internet as we know it. You will not be able to trust anyone who you don't know personally.
Problem is, until this law will be created, a lot of valuable time will be lost. And that will be the case with every law which would try to regulate this whole issue.
I agree with you. But I think it will be just like a huge list of previous inventions, which caused dramatic changes in society and the way people live.
E.g. Internet search engines, such as google. Previously, we had to seek out knowledgeable people, find a suitable book or magazine, or find out by trial and error etc.
These days we can just google or similar, and rapidly find the answer to an amazing range of possible queries.
You may be right, and it could mess up the existing quality of (usually) human written material, out there.
But I think it is coming, and it would be very difficult to stop it, now.
EDIT:
Looking on the bright side, a similar / analogy, might be chess computers. So, although chess computers (software), can beat even the best human chess players. Many people, still enjoy playing chess. Either against other humans or while playing chess computers / software.
The only real issue it has within chess, is that they have to be rather careful in chess competitions. To make sure that none of the players are (cheating) by using chess software, to win.