How about the dyslexic Devil worshipper?
He sold his soul to Santa.
This cancer is now apparently being pushed from many new accounts that show the Chinese flag. Let's just report those when it becomes obvious they are ChatGPT frontends.
Forum(s), could offer something on the lines of a user-ID verification process. In effect, to confirm they are human. Their real life (personal) details, would still be secret from other users. But they would have been verified.
I'm just thinking out loud at this point, but ...
If this bot-scripted-ChatGPT accounts issue, got really badly out of hand, and was causing major issues. Especially with possible future ones (ChatGPT v5.0 v6.0 ...), which could be significantly harder to detect.
Forum(s), could offer something on the lines of a user-ID verification process. In effect, to confirm they are human. Their real life (personal) details, would still be secret from other users. But they would have been verified.
I'm not suggesting we do that here, certainly not now, at least. But just trying to suggest, that there are possibly viable solutions, if it gets really bad.
And than the anonimity of the internet would be over, the Big Brother system would start to kick in.
if needed governments will force internet service providers to
And than the anonimity of the internet would be over, the Big Brother system would start to kick in.
As if the internet is really anonymous. Your IP address is know, and if needed governments will force internet service providers to fork over the information about you. Social media sites get your information when you enroll. If needed they will be forced to fork over the information. Everything you do online is monitored as soon as you allow cookies and use search engines, etc.
Of course you can use private browser windows or vpn's, but if they want they will find you. Anonymity is an illusion.
If a reputable user wants to include the occasional ChatGPT response, I see no issue with that.I do. If you have nothing to say, why post? If people are asking in a forum, it's not to find answers they would have found using a search engine or chat bot available to anyone.
Why would you do that? That's absolutely beyond me. That's the very opposite of what a forum is for.
I'm just thinking out loud at this point, but ...
If this bot-scripted-ChatGPT accounts issue, got really badly out of hand, and was causing major issues. Especially with possible future ones (ChatGPT v5.0 v6.0 ...), which could be significantly harder to detect.
Forum(s), could offer something on the lines of a user-ID verification process. In effect, to confirm they are human. Their real life (personal) details, would still be secret from other users. But they would have been verified.
I'm not suggesting we do that here, certainly not now, at least. But just trying to suggest, that there are possibly viable solutions, if it gets really bad.
And than the anonimity of the internet would be over, the Big Brother system would start to kick in.
Or no human interactions on the net, without ID. (The huge problem with the UK proposals as well.)
And if the certs get stolen? But even if in theory it would be an unhackable system which we all know exist until the practical implementation internationally gets through politics and regulation...
I'm just thinking out loud at this point, but ...
If this bot-scripted-ChatGPT accounts issue, got really badly out of hand, and was causing major issues. Especially with possible future ones (ChatGPT v5.0 v6.0 ...), which could be significantly harder to detect.
Forum(s), could offer something on the lines of a user-ID verification process. In effect, to confirm they are human. Their real life (personal) details, would still be secret from other users. But they would have been verified.
I'm not suggesting we do that here, certainly not now, at least. But just trying to suggest, that there are possibly viable solutions, if it gets really bad.
And than the anonimity of the internet would be over, the Big Brother system would start to kick in.
Or no human interactions on the net, without ID. (The huge problem with the UK proposals as well.)
And if the certs get stolen? But even if in theory it would be an unhackable system which we all know exist until the practical implementation internationally gets through politics and regulation...
If the certificates are compromised then you revoke the certificate.
If the certificate is biometric, then simply get another retina/iris/etc.
If the certificate is biometric, then simply get another retina/iris/etc.
Explain the concept or meaning of "stolen biometric certificate" (without talking nonsense).
Just because there is no EASY anonimity on the internet...
"AI"-detection systems will very likely flourish in the next years. And then "AI" companies will find ways to circumvent detection systems. And then, ... and then.
That will be exactly as with the spam and spam filters, just possibly orders of magnitude more complex and more expensive to handle.
(Speaking of spam, I've noticed an alarming rebound in spam lately that manages to pass through even the most aggressive filters.)
And that will be that much time and money that we can't invest in something more productive.
And, we will eventually be flagged as far-right and discriminatory if we ever attempt to discuss that.
The ChatGPT responses I have seen have two characteristics not found in ordinary user responses: There are no grammatical errors and there are no spelling errors. It should be easy to create an NLP to look for these features.
If a reputable user wants to include the occasional ChatGPT response, I see no issue with that.
I do. If you have nothing to say, why post? If people are asking in a forum, it's not to find answers they would have found using a search engine or chat bot available to anyone.
Why would you do that? That's absolutely beyond me. That's the very opposite of what a forum is for.
Not only that, but if a "reputable user" does that, it just conveys the idea that the user they are replying to is too stupid to do that themselves. It's wrong on all levels.
If a reputable user wants to include the occasional ChatGPT response, I see no issue with that.
I do. If you have nothing to say, why post? If people are asking in a forum, it's not to find answers they would have found using a search engine or chat bot available to anyone.
Why would you do that? That's absolutely beyond me. That's the very opposite of what a forum is for.
Not only that, but if a "reputable user" does that, it just conveys the idea that the user they are replying to is too stupid to do that themselves. It's wrong on all levels.
We shouldn't be controlling what people say. If someone just wants to dribble words, I say let them. They aren't harming anyone.
Some people just need to be heard and feel like they have a voice. Others get a feeling of satisfaction by contributing.
Yes you're right, we can all find answers if we look hard and long enough but a lot of times, it's not about that. I often ask questions here which I'm sure with enough research, I could find what I wanted, but why not reach out to a whole bunch of experts and have a discussion?
AI like ChatGPT is just another tool, and I encourage its use, just not by user accounts where that is the only source of content.