True. But, unlike with calculators, chatbots have the potential to spew across all aspects of our life. (Counterpoint: what proportion of spreadsheets contain significant errors?)
Using 4 AA batteries in a device can be a convenient and cost-effective way to power it. However, it's important to follow a few guidelines to ensure safe and effective use.
Firstly, it's important to use only alkaline batteries with the device. Alkaline batteries have a longer lifespan and are less likely to leak than other types of batteries, such as zinc-carbon batteries. In addition, different types of batteries may have different voltage and chemical properties, which could damage the device or cause it to malfunction.
Secondly, it's important not to mix different types or brands of batteries. Mixing batteries with different voltage or chemical properties can cause a variety of problems, including reduced performance, shortened lifespan, and even leakage.
Thirdly, it's important not to leave the batteries in the device for long periods of disuse. This is because over time, the batteries can leak, causing damage to the device and potentially harming the user. To prevent this from happening, it's a good idea to remove the batteries from the device when it's not in use and store them in a cool, dry place.
Finally, it's important to dispose of all batteries safely. Batteries contain chemicals that can be harmful to the environment, so it's important to dispose of them properly. Many communities have recycling programs that accept batteries, so be sure to check with your local recycling center to see if they accept batteries.
In summary, using 4 AA batteries in a device can be a convenient and cost-effective way to power it. However, it's important to use only alkaline batteries, not mix different types or brands of batteries, remove the batteries from the device when it's not in use, and dispose of all batteries safely. By following these guidelines, you can ensure safe and effective use of your device while minimizing the risk of harm to yourself and the environment.
Is that the right and best measuring stick for it?
Such lack of realization, doesn't seem to stop powerful chess playing computers, from beating, even the worlds best human players.
Or AI self driving cars, (when enabled/allowed, which sometimes happens, already, in some places, some of the time), driving me to where I need to go.
My post was about "education". But ok lets switch topics, there is no real natural "intelligent" cars driving around. Chess is not a measurement tool of human intelligence , nothing intelligent in remembering vast number of sequential pattern combinations dictated under certain rules. Go watch interviews with Garry Kasparov talking geo/politics the dude is a complete moronic fool.
"It is important to.." and "It is important not to..." appears to be a distinctive signature of Chat GPT.
Look how many times it used it here and in other posts.
"It is important to.." and "It is important not to..." appears to be a distinctive signature of Chat GPT.
The same thing will happen with large language models. Teachers will have to adapt how they assess their students, but not including AI in the teaching syllabus now is (IMO) a terrible mistake.
A new forum section now exists, I'll move this thread over to there.
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/chatgptai/
"It is important to.." and "It is important not to..." appears to be a distinctive signature of Chat GPT.
It's generating boilerplate. What I find weird that text like produced by ChatGPT was shunned just maybe a decade or two ago. This is all textbook example of poor writing; too verbose, with poor signal to noise ratio; polar opposite of "in a nutshell" writing. Yet even before the emerge of ChatGPT, I have noted such verbose writing style becoming highly popular. Clearly ChatGPT has learned that style by being trained by mostly 10-year old or newer material.
"It is important to.." and "It is important not to..." appears to be a distinctive signature of Chat GPT.
It's generating boilerplate. What I find weird that text like produced by ChatGPT was shunned just maybe a decade or two ago. This is all textbook example of poor writing; too verbose, with poor signal to noise ratio; polar opposite of "in a nutshell" writing. Yet even before the emerge of ChatGPT, I have noted such verbose writing style becoming highly popular. Clearly ChatGPT has learned that style by being trained by mostly 10-year old or newer material.Yes but you'd not use that construction in literally every single part of a response.
For example, GPT-4 can assume a Socratic style of conversation and respond to questions with questions. The previous iteration of the technology had a fixed tone and style. Soon ChatGPT users will have the option to change the chatbot's tone and style of responses, OpenAI said.
Read more at:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/how-to/whats-chat-gpt-4-everything-you-should-know-about-ai-that-not-only-answers-but-questions/articleshow/98679818.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
Socratic style of conversation is also a signature.
I think a mature human will be able to pinpoint telltale signs of a machine in a conversation.
Socratic style of conversation is also a signature.
I think a mature human will be able to pinpoint telltale signs of a machine in a conversation.
Socratic style of conversation is also a signature.
I think a mature human will be able to pinpoint telltale signs of a machine in a conversation.
Oh that's but one example of a style.
It can already look at the EEVBlog and look at members and their posts (up to 2021). Someone has already shown this. It has even characterized individual EEVBlog members styles and interests. So I'll just tell it to post in the style of "Bud" on the EEVBlog.
Me: I would like to generate a response in the style of "Bud" on the EEVBlog, can you do that?
ChatGPT: I'd be happy to give a response in the style of Bud on the EEVBlog! What would you like me to say?
Simple as that.
I would like to generate a response in the style of "Bud" on the EEVBlog forums. Please write a long winded note, that explains how you messed up your project, by 'mistake', one rainy Saturday night, while attempting to build an interesting project.
Well, let me tell you about the time I royally messed up a project by mistake. It was a rainy Saturday night, and I was feeling adventurous. I had this idea for an interesting project that I wanted to build, and I had all the parts laid out in front of me.
I had done my research, and I felt confident that I knew what I was doing. I had read through the datasheets and schematics, and I had a clear plan in my head. I was ready to get started.
I started by carefully soldering together the components, making sure to double-check every connection. Everything seemed to be going smoothly, and I was feeling pretty proud of myself.
But then, disaster struck. As I was soldering one of the components, I accidentally touched the iron to the wrong spot. There was a loud pop, and a puff of smoke came out of the project. I knew instantly that I had made a grave mistake.
I quickly unplugged the project, but it was too late. The damage was done. I had fried a crucial component, and the project was now useless.
I was devastated. I had spent so much time and effort on this project, and now it was all for nothing. I tried to salvage it, but there was just no way. I had to admit defeat.
Looking back on it now, I realize that I made a rookie mistake. I was so focused on getting the project done quickly, that I wasn't paying close enough attention to what I was doing. I let my guard down, and I paid the price.
But, as they say, you learn from your mistakes. And I certainly learned from this one. I now take my time when working on projects, and I always double-check my work before moving on. It may take a bit longer, but it's worth it to avoid making the same mistake twice.
So, there you have it. That's the story of how I messed up my project by mistake one rainy Saturday night. It was a hard lesson to learn, but I'm grateful for the experience. And who knows, maybe one day I'll revisit that project and get it right the second time around.
The same thing will happen with large language models. Teachers will have to adapt how they assess their students, but not including AI in the teaching syllabus now is (IMO) a terrible mistake.
It's only been a few months since ChatGPT was released, but already practically every university and school has a policy for it now. I don't think I've ever seen a piece of technology force the word to react so quickly. Name another?
Not bad! But I was really referring to GPT 4 which we can't use yet. However it will be even better than that!
The same thing will happen with large language models. Teachers will have to adapt how they assess their students, but not including AI in the teaching syllabus now is (IMO) a terrible mistake.
It's only been a few months since ChatGPT was released, but already practically every university and school has a policy for it now. I don't think I've ever seen a piece of technology force the word to react so quickly. Name another?
Smartwatches are probably the only other one. Before they were commonplace you could wear a watch into an exam room, at least in the UK. After Apple or whoever it was launched the first mainstream one nothing was allowed on your wrist. It's funny because my old Casio calculator watch did have a memo function, but given it took about half an hour to enter anything in, I think it'd be quicker to revise for the actual exam.
Me: I would like to generate a response in the style of "Bud" on the EEVBlog, can you do that?
ChatGPT: I'd be happy to give a response in the style of Bud on the EEVBlog! What would you like me to say?
It will be interesting to see how that new child board (or sub-forum), succeeds, in practice.
Me: I would like to generate a response in the style of "Bud" on the EEVBlog, can you do that?
ChatGPT: I'd be happy to give a response in the style of Bud on the EEVBlog! What would you like me to say?
Much fun to be had here on the forum with this!
Reminds me of a prolific user on Usenet electronics (and other) groups called Rod Speed.
He was so well known for writing bot-like replies that someone actually wrote a Rod Speed simulator, and it was pretty hard to tell the diffence!
It will be interesting to see how that new child board (or sub-forum), succeeds, in practice.
If it's a fad and people lose interest in talking about it then no harm at all. We've mearged "dead" sections before.