-
Is it possible to do the below PSU in size of 200mm x 200mm x 79mm?
4kW offline PSU….100-265VAC input. Output = +/-180VDC.
(4kW is constant load, not just peak)
Fan cooled, vented enclosure.
External ambient to 40degC.
-
Sure it is, if you know what you're doing and you don't mind it sounding like a server-rooom-ful of supplies.
-
Thanks, you mean we'd need super massive airflow cooling for the size indicated?...because its really too small for 4kW ?
-
Thanks, you mean we'd need super massive airflow cooling for the size indicated?...because its really too small for 4kW ?
Well, I am not a power engineer, but if you take a ballpark 80% efficiency, that means you need 5kW input for 4kW output. So that little 20x20x8cm box will need to dissipate 1kW of power somehow. Unless you stick it in front of a jet engine exhaust or liquid cool the thing, I just don't see that happening in that volume.
Even at 95% efficiency you would still need to dissipate 200W there.
You surely know that, right?
-
Thanks, i must confess that on digikey, many PSU's offtheShelf of 4kW and more, are 3 phase input.
This one is single phase and 3000W input.....
https://www.meanwellusa.com/upload/pdf/CSP-3000/CSP-3000-spec.pdf
...its 280mm x 178mm x 65mm = 0.00324m^3
The questioned size of 200m x 200mm x 79mm is 0.00316m^3 = 3160cm^3
....so its not that far off.
this 3kW one
https://www.xppower.com/portals/0/pdfs/SF_HDL3000-HV.pdf
...0.305m^3
................................__________________________________............................................
Searching [>3999W & Single phase input] takes quite some doing on digikey...but reveals the following 4.9kW PSU
https://www.artesyn.com/assets/ivs_ds_1591841960.pdf?a=8ae629292cc593d996b2a70d782393c20eb251a2
...its 280mm x 203mm x 127mm = 0.00722m^3
...but cost unknown to Digikey...just says "Active"......(which presumably means they see what they think you can pay?)
...so if volume scales linearly with power...then 4kw and single phase would be 0.00589m^3 = 5890cm^3......186% bigger than the questioned size of 3160cm^3 (just less than twice the size)
The Artesyn IVS PSU range seems to be the only 100-265VAC input 4-5kW output PSU on the market.
_________________________-------------------------______________________________
This one is 3phase and 4kW
https://www.belfuse.com/resources/datasheets/powersolutions/ds-bps-tcp3500-series.pdf
...Costs 2300£ and is 0.0035m^3
____________________________---------------------------------____________________________________
I suspect that at 4kW and single phase, people probably go direct to China?
I wonder what the cost would be?.....100/1000/10000 / yr ? -
The 3210W and 4500W Artesyn supplies are 170 - 264 V in https://artesyncom-prod.scdn8.secure.raxcdn.com/assets/trn_ac-dc_ivs_release_1_0_2011558451230_techref.pdf
It's certainly possible to design your proposed converter to fit in in three liters of volume, but it's hard to give any advice without a full set of specifications. Does the output need to be isolated? What output regulation do you need? If it doesn't need isolation, it could be as simple as a single-phase unidirectional APFC set to give 360V, with a synchronous buck running at fixed duty cycle to give you the midpoint reference.
If you truly need 4 kW output at 100 V RMS AC input, then the PFC will have to be dimensioned for the full 40+ A mains current, while still handling up to 264 V in. This would make the design more like a 9 kW 230 V PFC in terms of component sizing, if you want to compare your requirements against other reference implementations. -
Thanks, yes full output isolation needed (3750AC RMS) and regulation tight aswell.
(I like the reference to litres aswell.....a 2 litre bottle of coke, and a 330ml can of coke , is still my "reference object" for getting a sense of volume)QuoteThe 3210W and 4500W Artesyn supplies are 170 - 264 V in
Many thanks indeed for your correction.....that means there are no 100-265VAC , 4kW+ SMPS's available anywhere in the world (off the shelf) -
No real surprise that!
50A @ 100V up the snout, that is not a common requirement, and I think a 63A CEE mains connector is a significant fraction of the size of your proposed power converter!
Nobody is doing single phase input at that power level if they have any choice at all, and certainly not in universal input.
Some of the telecom 'rectifiers' come reasonably close, I have a couple of Eletek flatpack2 units that I use for RF shenanigans that come in at 109 x 41.5 x 327 mm and manage 2kW. You can get these with an output voltage that can be wound up to 170V, so two of them would get you +-170V @ 4kW but while they can operate down to 85V input they derate fairly savagely below about 170V up the snout. -
Even at 95% efficiency you would still need to dissipate 200W there.
Achieving high efficiency in small high power supplies is more about simplifying the heat extraction than reducing energy waste.
-
Even at 95% efficiency you would still need to dissipate 200W there.
Achieving high efficiency in small high power supplies is more about simplifying the heat extraction than reducing energy waste.
Which is why I was talking about it. But Treez didn't mention what kind of efficiency they are shooting for - and whether 95% is even achievable for what they are doing. Even 200W of heat (+ any derating, margins, etc) in such a small box would make me pretty uncomfortable. So
-
Quote
letek flatpack2 units that I use for RF shenanigans that come in at 109 x 41.5 x 327 mm and manage 2kW
Thanks very much for that, so thats 4kW from 2960cm^3....but only from 170VAC upwards.QuoteBut Treez didn't mention what kind of efficiency they are shooting for - and whether 95% is even achievable for what they are doing
Well yes hopefully 95% at full load...so yes, 200W, at least, to blow away. -
95% is almost always achievable.... if you are prepared to spend enough. It can complicate the supply, though, which is in conflict with a tight space requirement.Even at 95% efficiency you would still need to dissipate 200W there.
Achieving high efficiency in small high power supplies is more about simplifying the heat extraction than reducing energy waste.
Which is why I was talking about it. But Treez didn't mention what kind of efficiency they are shooting for - and whether 95% is even achievable for what they are doing. Even 200W of heat (+ any derating, margins, etc) in such a small box would make me pretty uncomfortable. So
-
Quote
Nobody is doing single phase input at that power level if they have any choice at all, and certainly not in universal input.
Thanks, the golden question is , of course, what is the highest power SMPS you can buy offtheshelf that does it from 100-265VAC?
I would guess 3680 Watts..thats 115VAC * 32A ?
Though i think some SMPS's run off remote mains generators, and they can be more than that....especially if its being used on someone's private property etc.
Basically if someone asks for a 4kW single phase input PSU, isolated, regulated output, 100-265VAC input, do you tell them, "no you can't have that....no installation would be available for you to ever plug it in?" -
Why are you double posting this stuff?
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/beginners/how-to-search-on-digikey-for-psus/
Is the one in the Beginners section 'treez (and his mates?) doing a hobby project' and this one the 'treez and his mates' prototyping a product (having failed to design one themselves)? -
Uh, you want a buck-boost? well it's a transformer if you want isolated anyway.
4kW output could set you back as much as 5kW input. That exceeds what a single phase socket can supply unless you go 32A which are huge. At that point most people play nice with the grid and make it 3 phase. So you will need active power factor correction, that is 3 stages of boost converter right there. Then you will need to step down. If it were not for the size requirement it would make sense or maybe it does anyway to design 3x 1.5kW single phase converters.
This is not a job for the uninitiated of which... I am one. -
Why are you double posting this stuff?
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/beginners/how-to-search-on-digikey-for-psus/
Is the one in the Beginners section 'treez (and his mates?) doing a hobby project' and this one the 'treez and his mates' prototyping a product (having failed to design one themselves)?
The thread https://www.eevblog.com/forum/supporters-lounge/treez-how-many-more-accounts-are-acceptable/msg3612350/#msg3612350 summarises the issue.
Basically, it is what treez, zenerbjt, opampsmoker, coffeefet, Faringdon, does. Like Canter and Siegel, Faringdon has his own style of communication. I wouldn't be surprised to find the same questions on other forums. -
95% is almost always achievable.... if you are prepared to spend enough. It can complicate the supply, though, which is in conflict with a tight space requirement.
Either way that would be 200W to dissipate without any margins, so probably has to be designed for at least 250W or even 300W dissipation. That's going to be pretty tough to cool in such small volume only with a fan and some metal heatsinks. And that assumes that the supply can be actually built in such small space in the first place (and ignoring all the input current issues mentioned already).
Sounds like someone promised something to a customer that borderline violates laws of physics here
-
modern design can achieve 90..95% eff, with GaN or SiC switches, soft switching, low losses Pfe, Pcu in magnetics.
Itis neither cheap nor off the shelf.
This is what power electronics designers and consultants get paid for.
Perhaps our friend from the UK just wanted the work for free? (:-:)
Jon -
Quote
Itis neither cheap nor off the shelf.
Thanks, please could you possibly advise approximately how much would it cost us to get a consultant to do it? (ball park figure?)
This is what power electronics designers and consultants get paid for.
(4kW, Single phase 100-265VAC, isolated, regulated, fan cooled, vent holes in enclosure, max 40degC ambient)
And also, please advise the cost for the easier spec of ...
(4kW, Single phase 200-265VAC, isolated, regulated, fan cooled, vent holes in enclosure, max 40degC ambient)? -
Bonjour cher Monsieur
I consulted decades ago 1970s..1990s. My recollection is $300..500/hr, no fixed cost is possible.
Nowadays most of the PSU design is in China and consultants are rare and fully booked for years.
The customer writes a SOW...Statement of Work, defining
source, load specs
environnement, temp amb min, max
cooling, airflow, acoustic noise
Regulatory compliance for EMI, power quality and safety
targeted sizes and weight
EAU..estimation of yearly use
targeted production cost
Define insurance, hold harmless and potential liabilities.
A serious OEM firm will be familiar with the use of expert consultants.
Check the IEEE power electronics, and industrial applications proceedings for advertisements...lots of positions available but no ads for consultants...
Finally depending upon the anticipated production quantity, the costs of design, testing, compliance and set-up are amortized thus a 100k quantity products can afford a 200K$ design but a 10..100 pcs run cannot.
Just the ramblings of an old retired EE
Bon chance
Jon
-
Might be worth flicking your size/spec requirements to www.powerstream.com and checking if they have anything that might work.
They are great at customizing their existing designs to meet your needs.
And even if it does cost a bit to get something custom, it will still be cheaper than getting something made from scratch. (Unless you're planning on selling 10000+ of them?) -
Nowadays most of the PSU design is in China and consultants are rare and fully booked for years.
That's the classic "trigger" for Faringdon Let's see how much self-restraint he has now.
-
Not any more - he is (or was, you can never tell from day to day) working for them. He regards them as jolly good chaps these days.
-
Like Canter and Siegel, Faringdon has his own style of communication.
Ouch! Been a while since I heard those names.
Still haven't forgiven them for the greencard spam that trailblazed commercial Usenet spamming, and ruined a good thing.
Regards, Dan. -
Like Canter and Siegel, Faringdon has his own style of communication.
Ouch! Been a while since I heard those names.
Still haven't forgiven them for the greencard spam that trailblazed commercial Usenet spamming, and ruined a good thing.
Yes, I well remember that - and also "the year that September never ended"
But someone was going to do it; C&S just got there first.