You seem to have a better analogy, don't you?
This one situation where an analogy serves no good.
Go learn how vacuum tubes actually work.
Just as a small example the J-FET analogy doesn't explain why a tetrode under certain conditions draws negative screen current.
Bad analogies are a trap for young players.
JFET is similar to a pentode (operating with the screen and suppressor grids connected to fixed voltages), but I do not think there is a solid state device that has the IV curves of a triode.
Yes there is, Static Induction Transistor (SIT), some info here: http://www.firstwatt.com/sitintro.html
I was reading with interest until he said "First, it allows a single gain stage...without a feedback loop or degeneration." As is widely known, a triode amplifier doesn't work "without feedback": the feedback happens internally.
JFET is similar to a pentode (operating with the screen and suppressor grids connected to fixed voltages), but I do not think there is a solid state device that has the IV curves of a triode.
I haven't seen one...
In this day and age vacuum tubes are for the most part at the end of their technological evolution. The last place you will find vacuum tube tech used in are devices like ion implanters, Ion discharge machining and similar industrial applications, where the work is being done inside a vacuum with an electron emitter and grids, anodes and the like to accelerate ions.
Vacuum tubes are still fun to play with.
Their shit outputs 10W from 200W input at 4.5% THD at full load and 0.18% THD at no load???
Where did you get the 200W input from? I see 18dB gain and 10W output.
The distortions figures are quite impressive for a single transistor power amp with no feedback, try getting anywhere near that with a single bipolar or MOSFET.
AF6LJ: Yolo, there are also mosfet tetrodes. Usually HF stuff. Also behaving well like a tetrode (pentode) valve, having the g1 input capacitance ridiculously low.
AF6LJ: Yolo, there are also mosfet tetrodes. Usually HF stuff. Also behaving well like a tetrode (pentode) valve, having the g1 input capacitance ridiculously low.
I know about dual gate MOS-FETS They don't behave fquite like a tetrode but are a beast all their own.
Their shit outputs 10W from 200W input at 4.5% THD at full load and 0.18% THD at no load???
Where did you get the 200W input from?
Go to the product page and look at the SIT1/SIT2 amplifier pages. Yes, this is an extremely inefficient design and there are barely any speakers it can drive properly.
Their shit outputs 10W from 200W input at 4.5% THD at full load and 0.18% THD at no load???
Where did you get the 200W input from?
Go to the product page and look at the SIT1/SIT2 amplifier pages. Yes, this is an extremely inefficient design and there are barely any speakers it can drive properly.
That's simply because they are Class A designs, which are inherently inefficient. Pure class A amps with reasonable power outputs are room heaters, irrespective of the type of power output device.
Go to the product page and look at the SIT1/SIT2 amplifier pages. Yes, this is an extremely inefficient design and there are barely any speakers it can drive properly.
It's a class A amplifier, so... that's just the way they work.
They're good for cold winter days. With a small enough heatsink you can even cook eggs.
Their shit outputs 10W from 200W input at 4.5% THD at full load and 0.18% THD at no load???
Where did you get the 200W input from?
Go to the product page and look at the SIT1/SIT2 amplifier pages. Yes, this is an extremely inefficient design and there are barely any speakers it can drive properly.
That's simply because they are Class A designs, which are inherently inefficient. Pure class A amps with reasonable power outputs are room heaters, irrespective of the type of power output device.
You have to differentiate a bit. Theoretically, a Class-A amplifier can have up to 50% efficiency. A Class A amplifier with complementary bipolar or MOSFET output devices comes very close to that number.
However, a single ended class a triode amp, which is very popular in the audiophile/audiophool community, will barely reach 10% efficiency which seems pretty insane but there are people who wouldn't have it any other way.
The Class A design was used as a selling point for the receiver I had in college. Well, at full volume (this sucker goes to 11!), it would barely get warm. But at normal listening levels - yes, I could fry eggs right in my dorm room. All was fine until I developed a habit of going to sleep with the volume really low for background noise - fried the outputs twice on it.
That's the one thing about Class A amplifiers I always remembered .... If you want them to run as cool as possible, you had to run them at full volume.
That's the one thing about Class A amplifiers I always remembered .... If you want them to run as cool as possible, you had to run them at full volume.
That sounds like a myth to me? Can you link to an analysis to support that.
Hmm...
My text books are buried somewhere if not long gone - and Google hasn't been too helpful. I've found some references to power dissipation in Class A amplifiers, but nothing that gives me what I was looking for - which would be a chart of power dissipation vs output power.
It is my understanding that pure class A amplifiers draw maximum power from their supply at no signal (and therefore no output). While not being particularly critical of my reading over the years, unless I've read it wrong, as power increased to the load, there is a corresponding drop in the power dissipated by the amplifier. Therefore the amplifier runs cooler at maximum output.
I'm open to correction if I've got that wrong.
Will still keep looking for something to back it up - but I can't spend any longer on this right now.
You have to differentiate a bit. Theoretically, a Class-A amplifier can have up to 50% efficiency. A Class A amplifier with complementary bipolar or MOSFET output devices comes very close to that number.
Not true for an equivalent design to the one shown in the SIT datasheet. The efficiency of a simple class A design is no better than 35% at full load, and much worse at low outputs or under quiescent conditions. Efficiency can be improved by using active loads rather than a simple resistor or transformer coupling, but even then you are unlikely to reach 50% efficiency.
You have to differentiate a bit. Theoretically, a Class-A amplifier can have up to 50% efficiency. A Class A amplifier with complementary bipolar or MOSFET output devices comes very close to that number.
Not true for an equivalent design to the one shown in the SIT datasheet. The efficiency of a simple class A design is no better than 35% at full load, and much worse at low outputs or under quiescent conditions. Efficiency can be improved by using active loads rather than a simple resistor or transformer coupling, but even then you are unlikely to reach 50% efficiency.
I suppose you missed my use of the words "theoretically" and "up to". Also, efficiency obviously relates to the maximum power output.
Lastly, transformer coupling is much more efficient than using active loads.
That's the one thing about Class A amplifiers I always remembered .... If you want them to run as cool as possible, you had to run them at full volume.
That sounds like a myth to me? Can you link to an analysis to support that.
Some amplifiers will switch in and out of Class A operation depending on output demands. At low levels it runs a room-warming Class A bias level, with some crank it switches to a more sane AB1 bias level and the heat drops accordingly. A straight Class A amp chugs out essentially the same heat with the volume at 0 or 11.
That's the one thing about Class A amplifiers I always remembered .... If you want them to run as cool as possible, you had to run them at full volume.
That sounds like a myth to me? Can you link to an analysis to support that.
It comes directly from the definition of class A. A pure class A amp draws a constant amount of power. At zero output it all ends up as heat in the amp. At maximum output some ends up in the load, so less ends up as heat in the amp.
That's what I was talking about! Thank you.
If my really quick look is correct, it looks like you can remove the valves and jumper pin 2 (control grid) to pin 3 (cathode) and get a much lower power, halfway decent headphone amp.
Can anyone confirm that method to bypass the tubes?
It would lower the power by a lot?
I wish another video was done on this amp about bypassing the tubes.
This amp gets criticism for the tubes not doing much, but if bypassing the tubes doesn't lower the power output, it's a lot of power for the price, and bypassing the tubes means no need to buy replacement tubes when the stock ones wear out. And it gets rid of the tube distortion, of course.
I have one and like it, but it'd be great to be able to bypass the tubes. If the power output would be the same.