Guys, push me one way or the other, here. I am getting into a number of PIC-based projects, and need to handle incoming signals, mainly digital. Not complex DSP stuff. So I have decided I need a sign Gen, and I might as well go for something which handles arbitrary waveforms, and is good for maybe 10-15 MHz. Some analogue stuff, too, so sine and ramp generators i can see a use for. I've done quite a bit of reading of the specs (only tell you so much), read the manuals (tells you more) and trawled these forums (tells you quite a bit!) but am still undecided.
I
HAD boiled it down to two.
- The good ole' HP/Agilent 33120A which is a solid piece of kit, in my price range, but does not handle pulse signals (I think I may need that). Solid support
Out a couple of years, now, the Rigol DG1022, which would compliment my DS1102E 'scope nicely, though feng shui in my "lab" is not such a big deal! Cheap and getting cheaper, but poor support, possibly flakey performance at the edges (but does that matter to me? probably not).
But then a THIRD one appears on my radar!
- Siglent SD1000 series (doesn't sound like anyone could confuse that name with Agilent, could they? Of course not, claimed Hugh LePackred, manufacturer of fine clones). Even CHEAPER than Rigol (which seem to be coming down in price on eBay as a direct result), and as plain as anything a rip-off copy of Rigol. Even the product manual has great chunks of the same Chinglish text! what a nerve!.
Siglent's angle seems to be "everything the Rigol does, but a bit more, and for a bit le$$". OK, I know well enough that you get what you pay for, and if we judge Rigol suportt poor, I'd assume that Siglent support will be cr@p once they've got your money.
I'd love to step up to something like an Agilent 33220, but I just cannot justify the folding to the Finance Committee (she said: "no").
Has anyone any experience of Siglent? Am I going to regret purchasing one, the moment I plug it in? Is a colour screen on a sig gen just
bling too far? Has anyone bought a Rigol and wished they'd gone with Agilent, or vice versa?
Oh, agonies!
Siglent == Atten. And see a previous teradown of an Atten AWG on this site. It ain't pretty.
Well thanks, B.A.W, that was the sort of article I was looking for! (Somehow missed it on my first couple of sweeps - other noobies: check out ATTEN ATF20B teardown if you want to see it)
So ATTEN is so much cr@p, then: jury still out whether Siglent is same but different Cr@p.
Hmm - i am leaning back towards the Rigol DG1220 . OK, it is not the full thoroughbred in the Dog's Dangly Bits department, but as long as it does what the manual says - and keeps doing it - I'll be happy. A SERIOUS hike in prices to reach the DG2000 level of sign gens makes it look all the more attractive.
I just KNOW there'll be a better, cheaper Rigol model around the corner, but (test equipment) life was ever thus.
Go for the Rigol DG1022! I have the Rigol And Atten and did the teardown of the Atten. Any manufacturer that will make a FAKE usb port on the device does not deserve to be incorporated on benches.
Atten are on a lower class its own, but Siglent is even lower than Atten even if both have the same parent company, based on samples of their wares within eevblog; see tear downs you can find on the archives. That the parent company resorts to sneaky things [ such as selling the same hardware with 2 different brand names] to make sales suggests dubious management practices, they would always be last in any list of possible vendors, if there at all.
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=4660.30Not a good way to make a brand name, IMHO.
Rigol is better rated, but if the number of bits needed in the AWG aren't crucial, have you looked at the thread done on the Hantek 3x25, as it does useful output to 100 MHz? With the money saved, I'd look for a used quality pulse generator from eBay.
... Any manufacturer that will make a FAKE usb port on the device does not deserve to be incorporated on benches.
That's a bit harsh statement. It's not good of course, but even my (rather expensive) Agilent DSO6034A has a connector and buttons that are not in use (for the optional $$$ logic inputs). And I'm quite happy to have that one on my bench, yessir
The problem with the Atten is more about the counter-intuitive user interface.
On the other hand, it's an absolute bargain to get two signal sources in a fancy looking case. So it's not bad to have as an extra. For me it's actually the only generator that gives me signals between 2MHz and 20MHz with some amplitude. I have a 'real' signal generator (2.4GHz Marconi) as well, but that one does only 2Vrms.
I love my Rigol 1022 so far. It has done everything i wanted it to do and AFAIAC the user interface is super. I dont care about computer interface so I cant comment on that aspect. I especialy like the ability to set the actual load impedance to match your actual load. That makes your set voltage output actualy match the voltage across your load.
Thanks for your replies, everyone. With minor variations, I am clearly reading that "you get what you pay for", although what you get seems to be going UP with each passing year - nice.
I've thought hard about my (present) NEEDS, and I think I want a "pulse" option in my generator, so that has already ruled out a good old HP 33120A, I believe
The Rigol DG1220 price seems to be coming down under pressure from latest clone offerings, so I think I will go for that, and not be TOO precious if some of the specs are more wish-list than verified measurements! I would like to step up to a DX2xxx or DG4xxx but the price hike is extreme (for me). I am sure the entry level product is going to do 95% of what I really need, which is 95% more that my current equipment...
And "hey", Saturation - I
TRUMP your NPN transistor with my old collection of Germanium (I thought that was a FLOWER?) PNP transistors! OC71, anybody?
I have a DG1022 although i've only had it a short while and it arrived during my university study/exam period so my experimentation time has been very limited.
The glincher for me was being able to use it with the Rigol scope capturing and replaying waveforms which seems to work very well
Making waves in ultrawave hasn't been as successful but given the limited amount of time i've had i wouldn't like to discount this being a user error just yet
... Any manufacturer that will make a FAKE usb port on the device does not deserve to be incorporated on benches.
That's a bit harsh statement. It's not good of course, but even my (rather expensive) Agilent DSO6034A has a connector and buttons that are not in use (for the optional $$$ logic inputs). And I'm quite happy to have that one on my bench, yessir
The problem with the Atten is more about the counter-intuitive user interface.
On the other hand, it's an absolute bargain to get two signal sources in a fancy looking case. So it's not bad to have as an extra. For me it's actually the only generator that gives me signals between 2MHz and 20MHz with some amplitude. I have a 'real' signal generator (2.4GHz Marconi) as well, but that one does only 2Vrms.
Oh well Atten, Siglent or Agilent is all same piece of errr instruments. The Rigol should be chosen any day over the Atten, Siglent
I've thought hard about my (present) NEEDS, and I think I want a "pulse" option in my generator, so that has already ruled out a good old HP 33120A, I believe
A pulse is just a single period of a square wave with a DC offset. A pulse train is a square wave with a DC offset. Square wave can produce pulses assuming it's within the duty cycle range, though control is less convenient. You can of course use the arbitrary ability to produce pulses of any shape. A dedicated pulse function is only available on the newer series (eg. 332xxA) I think.
I love my Rigol 1022 so far. It has done everything i wanted it to do and AFAIAC the user interface is super. I dont care about computer interface so I cant comment on that aspect.
Do you like programming arbitrary signals from the front panel, or did you spend the $$$ on an arbitrary/function generator without using the most expensive part?
Oh well Atten, Siglent or Agilent is all same piece of errr instruments. The Rigol should be chosen any day over the Atten, Siglent
What's wrong with the Agilent function gens?
I love my Rigol 1022 so far. It has done everything i wanted it to do and AFAIAC the user interface is super. I don't care about computer interface so I cant comment on that aspect.
Do you like programming arbitrary signals from the front panel, or did you spend the $$$ on an arbitrary/function generator without using the most expensive part?
I bought it on sale combined with the 1052E. had no current need for the arbitrary gen. Just needed dc offset capability and decent voltage range, liked the looks of the unit and the manual was understandable and I could afford it even if it is currently overkill for my needs.
I can confirm that, the DG1022 useable without even reading the manual, its intuitive and only bad side is the software does not work always.
However the Atten ATF20B is retarded and i would expect a few 10 year old kids to design much better UI
Happy holidays! The last time I saw a Germanium transistor was in 'transistor' radios that used either 9V or D 1.5V batteries.
One consideration for your lab is looking for repairable or working metrology grade lab equipment. These devices still have impressive specs by today. For example, a Tek SG505 still beats many audio generators today, and when they are made available are eBay sold ~< $200, working.
Thanks for your replies, everyone. With minor variations, I am clearly reading that "you get what you pay for", although what you get seems to be going UP with each passing year - nice.
I've thought hard about my (present) NEEDS, and I think I want a "pulse" option in my generator, so that has already ruled out a good old HP 33120A, I believe
The Rigol DG1220 price seems to be coming down under pressure from latest clone offerings, so I think I will go for that, and not be TOO precious if some of the specs are more wish-list than verified measurements! I would like to step up to a DX2xxx or DG4xxx but the price hike is extreme (for me). I am sure the entry level product is going to do 95% of what I really need, which is 95% more that my current equipment...
And "hey", Saturation - I TRUMP your NPN transistor with my old collection of Germanium (I thought that was a FLOWER?) PNP transistors! OC71, anybody?
That is nice price with free shipping!
... or it would have been a nice price! On asking our Chinese friends to confirm the advertised figure, i am told it is "now" USD $749. Hmm may pass on that one!
Slightly off topic - any good/bad experience of buying through AliExpress? It feels a bit like eBay without the safety net! I love jumpin' out of aeroplanes without a parachute, me
Slightly off topic - any good/bad experience of buying through AliExpress? It feels a bit like eBay without the safety net! I love jumpin' out of aeroplanes without a parachute, me
They are a subsidiary of Alibaba, who also run Taobao.
At the beginning of this year it turned out that 2% of Alibaba's own sales force were in cohorts with scammers, letting scammers onto Alibaba, resulting in something like 1% of newly signed up "verified gold suppliers" actually being scammers. That smells like organized crime to me.
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2052971,00.htmlhttp://www.economist.com/node/21016214But you know something is really going south when one notorious scammer (Paypal) refuses to deal with a fellow scammer (Aliexpress) any more
https://www.thepaypalblog.com/2011/06/update-on-aliexpress/Alibaba/Aliexpress/Taobao are also known for a lot of bait and switch going on. Sellers offer some brand product, but actually ship a clone or a mediocre domestic product as a "substitute". Complaining is difficult and sending the wrong item back is expensive, so often it is not worth it to complain and try to get the item replaced. The Alibaba escrow service is notorious for not responding to complaints and only considering a complaint, if at all, if no item was received, not if the wrong or broken item was received.
You decide if you want to risk that gamble.
when one notorious scammer (Paypal)
thanx to them. who refunded my money twice for item not received, and the 2nd item i got for free after it did arrived 2 months after the refund.
Yes, am further I am learning that their so-called Escrow agreement isn't all that it's cracked up to be - in other words, not independent of AliBaba & co, at all. Not enough Chinese walls and too many Chinese whispers?
Reading deeper into some of these "companies", and the "facts" just don't stack up, with a lot of them. I imagine sole traders, pitching popular items on AliExpress, with no stock to offer. When they land an order, THEN they run around looking for something close.
A good trawl through their feedback often reveals a most diverse range of previous sales, and often precious few (like, NONE) previous sales of the specific item of interest. Go figure.
I should add that I have made several small (sub $50) purchases from AliExpress over the last year or two, with no problems and decent savings. But big ticket items are the ones that are going to attract the crooks, of course.
Suddenly, eBay looks like the "safe(er)" place to do business!
They can even screw you with small orders. The order system has a feature allowing a seller to adjust the price after you ordered. Officially this is intended so the seller can give you a discount. Now the funny thing is if the seller enters a negative number in the price adjustment/discount field it is added to the price. You order something for $50, the seller gives you a "discount" of -$100 and you end up with an order of $150.
Officially this is a software error, but isn't fixed for whatever reasons ...
Suddenly, eBay looks like the "safe(er)" place to do business!
Well, probably the truly safer place to do business would be a local authorized dealer, or at least one in your own country. If you're in the UK, MCS Test Equipment has offered Rigol equipment for sale on this forum. Do a search.
Yes, I know of MCS (hello Joy, if you are following this!) and indeed bought my DS1102E 'scope through them in the early days. But I did pay a bit of a premium. Example: Rigol DG1022 SigGen - August price quote was GBP £325 + 20% VAT, delivered. Current "best" Ebay price GBP £266 delivered, but there is the RISK that customs will take an interest to the tune of a further 20%, of course.
The DG4000 series is still pretty new, so maybe prices are all over the place. The DG1022, on the other hand, is now widely available. And yet, on BOTH occasions, when I asked an ALiExpress reseller to confirm what looked to be very aggressive initial pricing, suddenly the price had gone up! (even though the original offer was still "up" on their site). OK, I get the picture.
I can easily see, B.A.W, how I might place an order for USD $300, only to find my credit card debited to the tune of $450 ("Solly sir this is new plice), and me without a proverbial leg to stand on!
Like my mother always said, "If something looks too good to be true, put it down and come and finish your dinner, or it goes in the dog." At least, I think that was it.
Try Batronix-they can be cheaper than MCS, free shipping to the UK from Germany and they do support what they sell; or at least when I had broken knobs on a couple of Rigols they replaced them for me. Pretty cheap for the DG1022