-
Well, I've decided to build zombie 5700A out of nothing
You're just a glutton for punishment aren't you? Any reasonable man would have been adequately chastised by that 3458A.
-
"Reasonable"...yeah, not a word you would use to describe a voltnut. Did you stop developing your own backplane-pcb for the PWM-DAC TiN?
-
I still might need to do it, as it's unlikely that backplane will be for sale on fleabay. But it will have ports for all boards instead of DAC only. oh well.
-
If TiN gets anymore out of control we're going to have to start a GoFundMe account to just pitch in and get him a 5700A.
-
Maybe an airline ticket to Everett so he can go dumpster diving?
-
I can soon have own dumpster, thank you.
Schematics for backplane board in progress
-
Initial schematics and PCB placement - check
Original 5700 board is 6-layer, I'll see if I can do in four. Need figure out some guarding and grounding connections. Also need to decide what relays to use instead of customized COTO 7003-5065 and COTO 7004-5071 which Fluke has.
-
Revive, revive...
I've finally got some vapourware relays (every single relay manufacturer ceased production of dual-coil 4PDT low-signal relays due to lack of demand), as abovementioned DS4E-ML2-DC5V-C-H239 relay on one of my Fluke 5700A boards (A8 switch matrix PCBA) have damaged housing.
While it was still working, I've replaced it now with standard DS4E-ML2-DC5V, bought from fleabay. Not to waste a chance, I've finished the desctruction of the housing, so ya'll can enjoy "teardown" photos of internal construction.
There are many relays of this type in 57xxA's , as well as DPDT version DS2E-ML2-DC5V-C's. So I've bought plenty till there is such chance.
To be continued...
-
Perhaps somebody may be interested in little stability study of above-mentioned 5700A.
Unit was calibrated in beginning of the year, against SR104 and Fluke 732B (both in <6 months from subppm standards lab cal).
Since that time we run calcheck's on various periods, storing all data. Lab temperatures were kept around 24-26°C. Unit was mostly 24/7 online till summer time.
Last few months it was turned off, and powered on just couple days ago before 8/29 calcheck.
Here's snapshot on resistance function:
I'd say not too shabby at all for 26-year old calibrator. Ohm board was replaced at some point with one made in 2005, according to IC datecodes.
Here's how it look like, in case you forget:
Given that lab was not controlled very well, no humidity control, I'd say numbers are very nice, well under 3ppm for all resistances except 100Meg.
Major 1K, 10K, 100K resistors are better than 1ppm stable over this 8 months period. -
For a reference / stable resistors an age of 26 or 12 years is not a problem at all. If handled proper, they get better with time. Not sure a brand new one would be that stable - unless Fluke keeps them for 1 year before delivery.
-
I was more concerned of impact with all those relays. There are many in the signal path with different configuration, which all may have different contact resistance, rather than hermetical ceramic resistors themselves. There are at least 3 relays on each resistance tap before they reach the internal MFC output bus.
Worth to note, that table above is stability versus own's 5700A "reference" 10K resistor (network Z5 on OHM CAL board), not the absolute deviation. -
I think the relay should be noticed and test if the machine has been used for heavy duty,the fluke 5100 calibrator has much faults caused by relays
-
Attached you find the ltspice-simulation (change from .txt to .asc) for the 5700A PWM-DAC, which greatly aided me in understanding the various circuit-tricks used in this schematic.
I only use Channel A PWM (V5) and added an additional R42/C12 lowpass behind the 190Hz-Filter. I didnt use this simulation since a while, but i think the rest of the component-values should be all according to the schematic.
-
About 5700 relays...
I was told by an old 5700 cal lab spezi that I even if my 5700 is not in use /standby regulary do the autozero to ativate the relays, to avoid oxide between contacts.
Watching the snails,cars,....
-
Hello. Let's revive the thread a bit. The fluke 5700a filter has about 121dB of rejection at the switched frequency. The filter input is 13 volts. At the filter output, conditionally, it should be ~ 11 microvolts. How does this fit in with his resolution? Hope for suppression by a integrator of multimeter?
-
The 13 V would be in the 11 V FS range and peak to peak value. The RMS amplitude is smaller (e.g. a factor of 2).
The main use is with a DMM and these do offer quite some suppression of the higher frequencies, especially when using 10 PLC integration.
With a really low noise meter and short integration (e.g. 3458 with 1 PLC mode) there may be some visible residual ripple. With many other meters one would have a hard time to see it in the 10 V range.
-
Were there examples of noise measurements anywhere? A quick search didn't help.
-
I recently read through the following patent US11316528 PWM DAC with improved linearity and insensitivity to switch resistance that could be interesting for some of you?
Edit: Attached also the previous patent US5402082 for completeness.
-branadic-
-
Is there anyone out there who worked on a PWM-DAC solution and wants to share the results? What controller did you use? What INL and resolution was achieved? Does it include temperature correction? Any result or link to a project is welcome as I couldn't find much on the web.
-branadic- -
Hello branadic,
as you already should know I used the EDN-Design
https://www.edn.com/dc-accurate-32-bit-dac-achieves-32-bit-resolution/
some results are here:
https://www.febo.com/pipermail/volt-nuts/2010-October/000537.html
The linearity shurely could be optimized if not using the whole range of the PWM.
E.g. cutting off the low and high end by adding a negative offset and amplification of the middle part.
(see last diagram here: https://www.eevblog.com/forum/metrology/stacking-ad587s-for-higher-output-voltage-(20v-30v-etc-)/msg1320513/#msg1320513 )
Alternatively one could do a mathematical correction. (of both linearity + temperature)
As controller any controller can be used which has at least 3 synchronizable 16 Bit PWM outputs which should be a multiple of the AC mains frequency to use the NMR of a multimeter. (e.g. 244 Hz or 300 Hz PWM frequency)
As controller I tested ATMega1284, PIC24FV32KA302 and one DSPIC.
with best regards
Andreas
-
Hi Andreas,
yes I know and was at some point working on a PCB as you might remember.
Unfortunately, the design only supports a 5 V reference and output but not (±)10 V, which is sad now that we have ADR1399, LTZ1000 and ADR1000.
Also the discussion about it such as the poor INL didn't convience me yet to make progress on the board.
-branadic- -
branadic: I had started to look how to improve the PWM-DAC used in 10MHz GPSDO. I have found 2 very similar solutions (2x 8bit PWM summed together) https://www.edn.com/combine-two-8-bit-outputs-to-make-one-16-bit-dac/ and https://www.ti.com/lit/an/sboa379/sboa379.pdf?ts=1651209621298.
edit: TI designed DAC is in https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slyt795/slyt795.pdf
During my investigation I have found some remark about PWM DAC with 8051 used for some space programm (I think that they have generated AC signal), Keithleys 38x SMUs, Advantest R6144. It seems that it is used all around us as a common way to change voltage or generate AC signal. Quite solid as can be seen on Keithley or Advantest examples. In theory one can combine 2 16 bit DACs to create 32bit signal. But it seems to me that DAC used in GPSDO cannot be simply build on the breadboard (voltage in my GPSDO is not too much stable).
-
branadic: I had started to look how to improve the PWM-DAC used in 10MHz GPSDO.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but a PWM DAC in a GPSDO doesn't need to be particular linear (it doesn't even have to be monotone) as it is used in the control loop (it's errors are just another error source auto-compensated, 'disciplined'). I don't think it needs to be very stable either.
[..]DAC used in GPSDO cannot be simply build on the breadboard (voltage in my GPSDO is not too much stable).
All long time drift will be auto-compensated by the GPS' PPS signal averaged over time. Of concern methinks (but I admit, I haven't thought this through
) is only short term drift, noise. Perhaps you'd be better off with a PDM DAC instead of PWM, as the former is easier to filter.
-
I recently read through the following patent US11316528 PWM DAC with improved linearity and insensitivity to switch resistance that could be interesting for some of you?
Edit: Attached also the previous patent US5402082 for completeness.
-branadic-
Thanks, but that patent looks like it has been written by a robot, not a lawyer. Skimming over it, it looks like Fluke prevents anyone else to use PWM with two switching networks without actually explaining how this addresses errors of (varying) switch resistance, imperfect, varying switch timing, stray capacities in the switches and charge injection. But then, perhaps it is obvious to those skilled in the art. Did anyone grok it and can translate it here to English, pretty please? -
...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but a PWM DAC in a GPSDO doesn't need to be particular linear (it doesn't even have to be monotone) as it is used in the control loop (it's errors are just another error source auto-compensated, 'disciplined'). I don't think it needs to be very stable either.
...
All long time drift will be auto-compensated by the GPS' PPS signal averaged over time. Of concern methinks (but I admit, I haven't thought this through) is only short term drift, noise. Perhaps you'd be better off with a PDM DAC instead of PWM, as the former is easier to filter.
You need short therm stability. It is not possible to measure the tuning voltage after filtering. It goes up and down ~50 mV in 1 second.
Second reason is that I want to use 12V oscillator and the PWM DAC from CMOS inverter (I know that I can use one buffer and big capacitor, but why not to build it with feedback).
