If you do not have kids your opinion about kids is irrelevant.
If you do not have kids your opinion about kids is irrelevant.
The stupidest thing that I've seen posted in this forum in a long time.
If you do not have kids your opinion about kids is irrelevant.
If you do not have kids your opinion about kids is irrelevant.
Please stop with the personal questions and stay on topic.
Why not just tell them to not get beaten? Much easier.
Nope, not according to the teacher's unions. OTOH there never will be either in their minds. It's a UNION thing. And it has nothing to do with real world values.
My point about having kids or not was experience (with kids). You proudly stated:
Every parent would laugh at you Obviously I concluded that you are inexperienced with kids. If it is not true - sorry.
If those are your children then tell them to not go into "corners cameras don't reach", or just apply for Darwin's award.
It's not as if children really have that choice if an adult says otherwise, especially in an abusive environment. If just telling them something would solve anything, the problem wouldn't exist in the first place.
In an abusive environment your children needs much more than "not get beaten" advice anyway. As you confirmed your lack of experience (by not acknowledging it) - we can end our debate right now.
How parent can be against video surveillance in the school (perimeter, entrance, hallways)? Please elaborate.
Because I live in Australia.
I see. When there are no security issues, you are more concerned about privacy. It is OK, but please do not apply your local knowledge worldwide. World is bigger than Australia, schools differ. As an extreme example I can mention that schools in Nigeria need armed guards.
How parent can be against video surveillance in the school (perimeter, entrance, hallways)? Please elaborate.
Because I live in Australia.
I see. When there are no security issues, you are more concerned about privacy. It is OK, but please do not apply your local knowledge worldwide.
I was not doing that
but it seems YOU are doing exactly that.
There are countries that don't really have these concerns and therefore do not share your desire and push for security everywhere.
Just claim your comment was a joke and we'll pretend to believe you and we can move on.
If you do not have kids your opinion about kids is irrelevant.
The stupidest thing that I've seen posted in this forum in a long time.
If you do not have kids your opinion about kids is irrelevant.
The stupidest thing that I've seen posted in this forum in a long time.
Agreed, it completely ignores the fact that all of us were kids at one point in time and some of us still remember being kids.
Both of you are completely missing the point. I did mean something like this: https://www.lifehack.org/articles/lifestyle/10-things-only-parents-will-understand.html. Most likely there are much better examples of "parents will understand", but it was first hit.
If you do not have kids your opinion about kids is irrelevant.
The stupidest thing that I've seen posted in this forum in a long time.
How many kids do you have?
[edit] Which country are you from?
And you??
The article you linked shows parents have a terrible judgement and are barely functional as normal human beings.
How parent can be against video surveillance in the school (perimeter, entrance, hallways)? Please elaborate.
Because I live in Australia.
I see. When there are no security issues, you are more concerned about privacy. It is OK, but please do not apply your local knowledge worldwide.
I was not doing that
Yes you did. Proof is in front of your eyes, quote in red.Quotebut it seems YOU are doing exactly that.
There are countries that don't really have these concerns and therefore do not share your desire and push for security everywhere.
When I say that video surveillance with audio assist in the schools is NOT waste of the money, it does not automagically imply that I desire video surveillance everywhere. Kinda obvious that places w/o security problems do not need video surveillance. I am sorry that it had to be stated.
You are the one that asked me "How parent can be against video surveillance in the school (perimeter, entrance, hallways)? Please elaborate."
As to you not implying that you desire video surveillance everywhere, your own question to me above proves otherwise: "How parent can be against video surveillance in the school (perimeter, entrance, hallways)? Please elaborate."
This is just silly.
You are the one that asked me "How parent can be against video surveillance in the school (perimeter, entrance, hallways)? Please elaborate."You came-up with "novel concept" - train teachers with money of surveillance, not specifying any particular school or country.
You came-up with "novel concept" - train teachers with money of surveillance, not specifying any particular school or country. I implied that you did mean US schools with security problems mentioned in the OP. To suit your narrative of your "novel concept", you suddenly decided that you talk about schools of Australia, not US. I answered - you shall not apply your local knowledge worldwide.
The providers of this system are just milking the cash cow with useless impractical technology.
There's nothing like solid proof of repeated bulling, it will get them expelled instantly.