Author Topic: Bridging across solder jumpers during reflow.  (Read 1327 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline phil from seattleTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1254
  • Country: us
Bridging across solder jumpers during reflow.
« on: November 24, 2025, 08:54:12 am »
I have been using 3 pad solder jumpers on a number of board I have designed.  Usually, I run a trace between the default pads. If the user wants to switch, they have to cut the trace and solder bridge the other pads. Making my customers cut traces is a source of problems.

I would like to switch to having a solder bridge created during reflow rather than a trace that needs to be cut. This will make it a lot easier to switch the jumper.

How should I go about doing this?  Create a mask layer area that spans the two default pads? Is that sufficient? Will that cause a bridge?
« Last Edit: November 24, 2025, 08:56:17 am by phil from seattle »
 

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 15544
  • Country: ch
Re: Bridging across solder jumpers during reflow.
« Reply #1 on: November 24, 2025, 09:24:42 am »
I have no experience on whether your suggested approach would work. (Sometimes, it’s hard to make solder jumpers work, even by hand with a soldering iron. I’m sure there is some specific jumper geometry that works better than rectangular pads. I’ve seen chevrons, for example.)

What definitely works is to just use 0 ohm jumpers. Easy to install, easy to remove.
 

Offline phil from seattleTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1254
  • Country: us
Re: Bridging across solder jumpers during reflow.
« Reply #2 on: November 24, 2025, 04:28:50 pm »
What definitely works is to just use 0 ohm jumpers. Easy to install, easy to remove.

Thanks for replying.  Yes, they do.  The problem is you have to make them reasonably big - 803.  And desoldering them to move is almost as big a challenge as trace cutting.  I'm pretty skilled at board rework and I lose over half the resistors I desolder.
 

Offline langwadt

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5631
  • Country: dk
Re: Bridging across solder jumpers during reflow.
« Reply #3 on: November 24, 2025, 04:34:29 pm »
What definitely works is to just use 0 ohm jumpers. Easy to install, easy to remove.

Thanks for replying.  Yes, they do.  The problem is you have to make them reasonably big - 803.  And desoldering them to move is almost as big a challenge as trace cutting.  I'm pretty skilled at board rework and I lose over half the resistors I desolder.

if it is just a 0 Ohm resistor  it doesn't really matter if you lose them, just make a solder bridge, so smaller is easier

for assembly it seem easier to make different parts DNP than changing the paste mask to change solder bridges
 

Offline Doctorandus_P

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5064
  • Country: nl
Re: Bridging across solder jumpers during reflow.
« Reply #4 on: November 24, 2025, 11:04:09 pm »
I would like to switch to having a solder bridge created during reflow...

That would be difficult to do reliably. You can start with making the narrowest gap that your PCB manufacturer can manufacture, and combining it wit a solder mask aperture that is bigger then the pad to encourage bridging, but I guess it will still be unreliable.

Maybe using a 0 Ohm resistor for the factory, and then combine it pads that can also be used as a solder bridge to override it manually is a good combination.
 

Offline abeyer

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 845
  • Country: us
Re: Bridging across solder jumpers during reflow.
« Reply #5 on: November 24, 2025, 11:11:07 pm »
If they really can't be expected to use a soldering iron, why not 0.1" headers and a removable plastic jumper? or a dip switch? those were always the standbys for easy user config.
 

Offline phil from seattleTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1254
  • Country: us
Re: Bridging across solder jumpers during reflow.
« Reply #6 on: November 25, 2025, 01:30:36 am »
If they really can't be expected to use a soldering iron, why not 0.1" headers and a removable plastic jumper? or a dip switch? those were always the standbys for easy user config.

They are expected to solder various connectors onto the board.  Small SMDs are a challenge.

Dip switches and 2.54mm headers are possible but are big and space is limited. And, dip switches add cost, especially spdt.
 

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 15544
  • Country: ch
Re: Bridging across solder jumpers during reflow.
« Reply #7 on: November 25, 2025, 10:18:12 am »
What definitely works is to just use 0 ohm jumpers. Easy to install, easy to remove.

Thanks for replying.  Yes, they do.  The problem is you have to make them reasonably big - 803.  And desoldering them to move is almost as big a challenge as trace cutting.  I'm pretty skilled at board rework and I lose over half the resistors I desolder.
803?

You mean either 0805 or 0603, right?

Anyway, as langwadt said, who cares if you lose it? You can either use a new one, or (with a footprint optimized for solder bridging) then bridge it by hand.

0805 and smaller are easy to remove with just a big blob of solder on an ordinary soldering iron tip.

Anyhow, the key idea here is that if you optimize the footprint for manual jumpering, you can still use a 0 ohm jumper for reflow, but use manual jumpering for later modification.


Another option is jumpering with through-hole wire jumpers.


With that said, if the users are really so unskilled that they can’t cut a trace or desolder a resistor, it really may make sense to use switches or headers+jumpers. You don’t have to use expensive SPDT switches, just use multiple SPST.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf