Author Topic: -84  (Read 2989 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline zhtoorTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • !
  • Posts: 337
  • Country: pk
-84
« on: June 16, 2017, 10:28:28 pm »
-
« Last Edit: May 21, 2018, 10:53:08 pm by zhtoor »
 

Offline Vtile

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1144
  • Country: fi
  • Ingineer
Re: Poor Man's LM399
« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2017, 01:03:16 am »
Sry. Late night, but if I understood the problem the buried zeners like famous 1n82xx series are stabilized by regular PN-junction in series in silicon level. Like discussed in Tim Williams "Circuit designers companion" mentioned a few days ago in beinners section in "litetature about diodes" thread or similar. Ps. Im not a "learned member".
Pps. If I have understood correctly the higher temperature increases the noise of silicon semiconductors (90 seg.) while 250 deg. it becames self conducting (160 deg. or similar for germanium).
« Last Edit: June 17, 2017, 01:21:09 am by Vtile »
 

Online Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14202
  • Country: de
Re: Poor Man's LM399
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2017, 08:03:37 am »
Usually the zener diode current is chosen to a value, so that the TC just compensates with the diode / transistors forward PN junction. With the choice of diode one also has a little to adjust. The diodes TC is somewhere in the 1.6 -2.4 mV/K depending on the diode, especially the forward voltage.

The concept of a shunt regulator like in the LM399 / LM329 / TL431 is generally not attractive for a good reference. I adds additional power loss to the critical part. Usually one should minimize the power loss in the critical section and if needed have extra heat sources and load drivers outside at less critical parts. The main reason for this configuration is the easy replacement of older simple zeners.  It also needs that external current source to be stable - so at best it is a partial solution.

I don't like the resistor at emitter side of the transistor - reduces the regulation gain and makes is sensitive to changes in that resistance. It is a little like increasing the zener resistant. So I doubt the circuit idea will lead to something useful.

If the aim is to make a good reference from a diode like the 2DW232 one should more look at the LTZ1000 circuit or the LTFLU reference amplifier. These circuits usually take the voltage directly from the reference elements, but still have an buffer amplifier that can in principle deliver quite some current, without changing the reference current itself.
 

Online Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14202
  • Country: de
Re: Poor Man's LM399
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2017, 04:41:11 pm »
The LM399 has quite a few not so good points:
1) The temperature regulation is set to a rather high temperature. A lower temperature could have improved drift and noise. Not many application need such a high temperature due to something like a 75 C board temperature.
2) The zener current is rather low and fixed - so a relatively high noise, but still good enough for a 5 digit DMM.
3) Using the Shunt configuration means that there should not be a significant load current to the reference circuit. This is a little inconvenient, but not that bad. OP with well lower noise and drift than the LM399 are not that special.
4) The shunt configuration is only good for a limited driving power of the reference circuit - due to the internal gain it is better than just the raw zener, but not good to drive a variable current. A true ref amp can drive higher currents without much negative influence.

Still it is a widely used reference - maybe because it is not that expensive. At something like $12-15 it is well affordable, as it does not need expensive resistors in the support circuit. A fixed temperature and fixed zener current also means there are no external precision resistors needed to set the current and temperature. The integrated temperature control is rather convenient, though it means extra power that could be avoidable in principle. For highest performance a separate reference and control circuit (like with the LTZ1000) has some advantages. One is that one could use good size capacitors for the usually relatively slow temperature control.

Using a higher current for the zener is a two sided thing. In a temperature stabilized setup one usually needs a heater power that scales with the power requirements of the reference itself. Something like 2-5 times that power (under normal temperature) seems to a reasonable compromise to have so reserve for a higher room temperature. The 2DW232 zener, if used with the second diode in series is more on the high current side (e.g. 20 mA range, but varying). For a heated reference this is rather on the higher side. If it is just for the noise, a lower current in the 1-2 mA range might be good enough.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf