I have not had that problem with 16F1xxx chips on a Win7 maching running 8.92.
A problem I did have with some chips (e.g., 16f17xx) is that it returns an error to the effect ID returned 0x0000, expected some bizarre value, when in fact the correct chip ID was returned. Of course, Microchip refused to help, but its forum led me to roll back to an earlier .jam file. That fixed the problem. If your chip is relatively old, maybe an earlier, better tested .jam file will help. I think the .jam I am using is one or two versions earlier as it is the enhanced mid-range type. Of course, you have to check that whatever .jam you add covers the chip you are using.
That episode cost me a few months as the old days when you could correspond directly with someone in Chandler are gone forever. A typical question-response time was several days, and often the response was "move to MPLabX." It was frustrating, and I suspect support for MPLabX is not much better.
The most current .jam appears to be ICD3FW_02890.jam. ICD3FW_012840.jam (11/30/12) from 8.89, ICD3FW_012838.jam (11/29/2012) from 8.89, and CD3FW_012656.jam (04/19/2011) from 8.70 are on my machine. I don't remember which one worked with that chip. None of that may be relevant to your issue, unfortunately.