Author Topic: more phoolery?  (Read 4113 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mobbarleyTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 200
  • Country: au
more phoolery?
« on: April 10, 2011, 02:06:37 pm »
http://www.shakti-innovations.com/audiovideo.htm

They also claim it makes your car go faster.
 

Offline Zero999

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 22471
  • Country: gb
  • 0999
Re: more phoolery?
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2011, 02:18:25 pm »
Yes usual bollocks , I stopped reading after the first paragraph.
 

Offline Simon

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 18908
  • Country: gb
  • Did that just blow up? No? might work after all !!
    • Simon's Electronics
Re: more phoolery?
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2011, 04:02:31 pm »
yea, anyone buys one of those deserves to get screwed
 

Alex

  • Guest
Re: more phoolery?
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2011, 04:40:49 pm »
Just reading the functional description is insulting.
 

Offline slburris

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 556
  • Country: us
Re: more phoolery?
« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2011, 04:41:24 pm »
But they got a patent, so it must be worth something :-)

Scott
 

Alex

  • Guest
Re: more phoolery?
« Reply #5 on: April 10, 2011, 04:47:44 pm »
Ah! You must have not seen the bottom spanking machine and the centrifugal birth machine.

http://www.colitz.com/site/3216423/3216423.htm

Most of the times patents on their own are worthless.

Alex
 

Offline mobbarleyTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 200
  • Country: au
Re: more phoolery?
« Reply #6 on: April 17, 2011, 01:58:58 pm »
Ah! You must have not seen the bottom spanking machine and the centrifugal birth machine.

http://www.colitz.com/site/3216423/3216423.htm

Most of the times patents on their own are worthless.

Alex


wow.
 

Offline Fraser

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 15209
  • Country: gb
Re: more phoolery?
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2011, 06:55:17 pm »
Alex,

Ref. the centrifugal birthing machine.......

I haven't laughed so much in ages  :D

The thought of the sprog flying out of the poor women and getting caught in a catch net sort of remings me of the aircraft carrier emergency catch nets for wayward aircraft  :D Baby would have one heck of a headache and I feel sure the experience would ve very interesting for the woman as well ! To produce enough lateral thrust to 'launch' the sprog would likely result in the women getting G induced blood starvation to the brain at the very least.... you can't really put a G suite on a pregnant woman can you  ;)
If I have helped you please consider a donation : https://gofund.me/c86b0a2c
 

Offline Simon

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 18908
  • Country: gb
  • Did that just blow up? No? might work after all !!
    • Simon's Electronics
Re: more phoolery?
« Reply #8 on: April 17, 2011, 07:16:08 pm »
the joys of living in an age of ignorance  ;D
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf

 

-->