Attached is the base magnet: large ferrite discs with a fixed distance (adjustable with different matched standoffs).
With 40mm standoffs I get a field strenght B0 = 550 Gauss...
It may be helpful to realize that changing the separation distance (standoff length) changes not only the strength, but also the shape (and thus uniformity or homogeneity), of the magnetic field.
It may also be helpful to be aware that sintered magnets (ferrites and rare earths) consist of particles having nonuniform sizes, shapes and alignments, so have nonuniform density and magnetization. Their fields vary (between two magnets, or cross the surface of a disk magnet) by between 5% and 10% in strength and 5 and 10 degrees in direction (and inexpensive magnets available on Ebay etc., made in workshops in rural China with poor quality control, may be worse than that). This can be mapped using a Hall probe (see figure 2 in the paper linked below).
For low permeability (rare earth) disk magnets, the magnetic field is identical to that produced by a pair of Helmholtz coils wound on the outer cylindrical surface of the disks. To produce the most nearly uniform field, the distance between their centers should be equal to their radius (the same spacing as a Helmholtz pair).
For high permeability (ferrite) disk magnets, the field uniformity should continue to increase as the gap is made smaller than the Helmholtz spacing. However, if their magnetization is not uniform, it'll instead get worse.
It's likely possible to achieve a homogeneity of 1% across a 1 cm3 volume, but unrealistic to expect 0.1% = 1 ppt, let alone 200 ppm. Realize the the field (in-)homogeneity across the entire sample determines the magnetic resonance linewidth. It will be very broad, and correspondingly difficult to detect (impossibly so, if not anticipated and designed accordingly).
For these reasons, magnets designed to create high field homogeneity (i.e. for NMR/ESR) rely on iron pole pieces to shape the field, whether driven by an electromagnet or by a permanent ferromagnet. (To increase the field, most also use iron yokes to create a low-reluctance field return path (i.e. magnetic circuit), or taper the pole pieces to smaller diameter, or both.) Slightly concave pole pieces are ideal, but even simple flat pole pieces help make the field more uniform. See Chonlathep et al., JMR (2016)
https://ur.booksc.eu/book/77436329/d24ca5 , which is based on Eiichi Fukushima's earlier design (ref. 9 therein). A similar magnet design is shown in Figures 2 and 3 of Cooley et al. JMR (2020)
https://tabletop.martinos.org/images/a/a6/1-s2.0-S1090780719302642-main.pdf Hope these are helpful.