I guess you are saying that the old school reverse engineering, and by that I assume making duplicate copies was not Epic.
I kind of agree of the old school reverse engineering not being epic so it's off-topic, I myself did an assembly routine to copy zx spectrum tapes that had fake headers for copy protection, maybe it was a huge deal then, but now systems are so complex with different processor etc that is not that simple.
Back in those days we knew every special memory addresses by heart and we had access to the full disassembly of the ROM.
Making a simple reader to get the data from tapes, etc was a simple task, as it was decompiling the opcodes by hand because we didn't have the tools available now, but because those old systems where so simple it was possible to do things manually, to the point that I would recognize the opcodes and didn't have to resort to look at the z80 instruction set. Edit: and the z80 is way more complex as far as number of opcodes than the 6502.
Today that's not really that simple, unless you are talking about a cortex m0 that hardly that many opcodes or legacy 8 bit MCUs.
Old systems didn't have any encryption at all, they did however did have schemes to try to protect their work. Even now a days on PCs that's still the case, nothing is truly protected because the amount of tools out there, but what she is doing is not taking the protection out of a piece of software, reverse engineering that blue-ray disc is orders or magnitude more complex than trying to break some copy protection scheme on some software running on a computer that you have full access to.
So not off-topic really, but if you are going to downplay what she is doing there and try to ridicule the work done and compare it to those old simple times you can't just make your comment go away by just saying we are taking things off-topic.
The saddest thing though is that her technique is less advanced than what we used in the mid/late 80s to break protections on Commodore 64 games.
We've come so far in 25-30 years
