1) I'm using 2200uF electrolytic capacitors to smooth each side of the rectified voltages coming from the split output transformer.
Question - This is more habit than anything else. How would people normally decide on the actual values.
>>When the filter capacitor is not being charged by the AC source, the current drawn by the load cannot cause the voltage on the capacitor to dip below the required input voltage of the regulator. I will show below a diagram that illustrates this.
2) I'm using 470uF electrolytic capacitors to smooth each side of the voltages coming from the rectifiers. <<regulators??>>
Question - How would people normally decide on the actual values, I have made an educated guess.
>>You don't need 470uF. Typical is 0.1uf but look at the datasheet for the regulator. The manufacturer will recommend the value. I noticed that on the 7912 datasheet, you are warned that any value over 100uF needs a diode from input to output because on powerup, the capacitor appears as a short momentarily.
3) The output of the 7912 is -16v until a load is added at which point it drops to the right level.
Question - Would people add a load across it to force it to drop or just leave it like that? Maybe power the "Power on" LED using the -12v line?
>>Sounds odd to me but it has a long time since I have used a negative regulator. I looked at the schematic of the 7912 and there is already a resistive load ground from the output. Look at it with an oscilloscope. May be unstable. Remove the 470uF cap and check again.
4) More general.
Question - Is there any real issue using too large capacitors other than general engineering principles of waste of space/cost etc.
>>As noted above, a large cap can create a problem. They can cause stability problems in some circuit configurations.
5) Regarding electrical checks re power.
Question - If I want it to manage 500mA how would people check this. My current plan is setting the limit on the bench power supply and using large resistors to load the output. Is this a reasonable plan? Is there something better?
>>That is probably what I would do.