Author Topic: small footprint 2-contact IDC connectors?  (Read 1068 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline WatthTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 241
  • Country: fr
small footprint 2-contact IDC connectors?
« on: January 23, 2023, 09:11:42 pm »
Hey,
I'm considering the design of a programmable LED mounted on cables. Each LED has its tiny PCB (a few mm each side), that is mounted along power wires (about 0.4 mm² each).
The data wire can be soldered, as it is daisy chained. For the two power wires, I'm looking into IDC transition connectors as they seem to have the advantage of not requiring wire stripping nor soldering.
The issue is that, as I'm exploring options, the connectors I find are either to large, or don't exist in 2 pins configurations.
So do you know any suitable reference?
Thanks for reading!
Because "Matth" was already taken.
 

Online ajb

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2605
  • Country: us
Re: small footprint 2-contact IDC connectors?
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2023, 08:44:03 pm »
Are you looking for something that can be unplugged from the PCB, or something that allows the wire to be punched down directly on the PCB?

A quick google turned up these: https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/kyocera-avx/709177001522006/7101337

Would they (or something like them) work?  There seem to be other options, possibly through hole or maybe smaller versions as well.
 
The following users thanked this post: Watth

Offline WatthTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 241
  • Country: fr
Re: small footprint 2-contact IDC connectors?
« Reply #2 on: January 25, 2023, 10:45:55 am »
Are you looking for something that can be unplugged from the PCB, or something that allows the wire to be punched down directly on the PCB?

A quick google turned up these: https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/kyocera-avx/709177001522006/7101337

Would they (or something like them) work?  There seem to be other options, possibly through hole or maybe smaller versions as well.
pluggable or PCB connector: well both options are good to me.
I already saw the type of connecter you link to, the issue being their size.
I've explored a few manufacturers' catalogue, and it seem I want something unrealistic: for this wire gauge connectors are too big.

Anyway,thanks for your reply!
Because "Matth" was already taken.
 

Offline berke

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 258
  • Country: fr
  • F4WCO
 

Offline WatthTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 241
  • Country: fr
Re: small footprint 2-contact IDC connectors?
« Reply #4 on: January 25, 2023, 04:13:20 pm »
I don't think these are compatible with IDC cable connectors.
Because "Matth" was already taken.
 

Offline tszaboo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7390
  • Country: nl
  • Current job: ATEX product design
Re: small footprint 2-contact IDC connectors?
« Reply #5 on: January 25, 2023, 04:18:03 pm »
AVX has these in their portfolio, especially for LED lighting.
https://www.kyocera-avx.com/products/connectors/wire-to-board/idc-connectors-14-28-awg/
 

Offline WatthTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 241
  • Country: fr
Re: small footprint 2-contact IDC connectors?
« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2023, 07:26:53 pm »
AVX has these in their portfolio, especially for LED lighting.
https://www.kyocera-avx.com/products/connectors/wire-to-board/idc-connectors-14-28-awg/

It seems I didn't check the whole AVX catalog, these on could do the trick.
The issue is these don't seem available.
Thanks anyway!
Because "Matth" was already taken.
 

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11516
  • Country: ch
Re: small footprint 2-contact IDC connectors?
« Reply #7 on: January 25, 2023, 07:59:36 pm »
The issue is that, as I'm exploring options, the connectors I find are either to large, or don't exist in 2 pins configurations.
Define “too large”. That can mean anything without context. ;)
 

Offline WatthTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 241
  • Country: fr
Re: small footprint 2-contact IDC connectors?
« Reply #8 on: January 26, 2023, 01:05:59 pm »
That's true!
I also haven't decided if I double each PCB's number of LED. Maybe I should first try the LED model I'm looking into to see if I need to put more than one of these LED on each board to have more light intensity.
So it's true the one's that have been considered until now would do.
Because "Matth" was already taken.
 

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11516
  • Country: ch
Re: small footprint 2-contact IDC connectors?
« Reply #9 on: January 26, 2023, 07:15:12 pm »
That still isn’t an answer as to what “too large” is. You need to be specific. Give us millimeters.
 

Offline WatthTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 241
  • Country: fr
Re: small footprint 2-contact IDC connectors?
« Reply #10 on: January 27, 2023, 01:09:50 pm »
That still isn’t an answer as to what “too large” is. You need to be specific. Give us millimeters.
I thought my previous answer implicitly said: "actually I need to think about it".
Because "Matth" was already taken.
 

Offline tszaboo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7390
  • Country: nl
  • Current job: ATEX product design
Re: small footprint 2-contact IDC connectors?
« Reply #11 on: January 27, 2023, 01:31:16 pm »
AVX has these in their portfolio, especially for LED lighting.
https://www.kyocera-avx.com/products/connectors/wire-to-board/idc-connectors-14-28-awg/

It seems I didn't check the whole AVX catalog, these on could do the trick.
The issue is these don't seem available.
Thanks anyway!
You probably have to contact them for samples, and buy a whole reel. Not all company will have their entire portfolio on digikey. Good luck.
 

Offline WatthTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 241
  • Country: fr
Re: small footprint 2-contact IDC connectors?
« Reply #12 on: February 02, 2023, 12:18:33 pm »
That still isn’t an answer as to what “too large” is. You need to be specific. Give us millimeters.
I thought my previous answer implicitly said: "actually I need to think about it".
Now that I re-read my message, I realize it sounds rude while your point is perfectly valid. Sorry about that.
Because "Matth" was already taken.
 
The following users thanked this post: Someone, tooki


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf