Author Topic: Sodium Ion Battery evaluation  (Read 19679 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online tom66

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6709
  • Country: gb
  • Electronics Hobbyist & FPGA/Embedded Systems EE
Re: Sodium Ion Battery evaluation
« Reply #50 on: December 29, 2023, 02:02:10 am »
The discharge curve is really quite different to a normal LIB (stolen from BatteryU).



There is no real cliff edge like LIBs... the battery seems to run almost all the way down to zero volts.

What little I did read about SIBs suggested that they are tolerant of being fully discharged whereas LIBs will typically experience damage when cell voltage falls below 2.5V or so, and minimum discharge at low temperatures (below -10C) should be limited to around 3V/cell.  The info I found said that SIBs may even be shipped completely discharged as it makes them safer to ship that way.
 

Offline eneuro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1528
  • Country: 00
Re: Sodium Ion Battery evaluation
« Reply #51 on: December 29, 2023, 02:36:04 am »
The info I found said that SIBs may even be shipped completely discharged as it makes them safer to ship that way.
I also heard that Na-ion can be transported completely discharged, but maybe it depends on the specific battery model because their production and chemical composition do not have to be identical?

I'm currently looking at the datasheet of the Na-ion batteries I ordered and with the help of uncle Google I managed to translate from Chinese to English something like this:  >:D
Quote
Standard discharge method
Refers to discharging at a constant current of 0.50C to a single cell voltage of 1.50V in an environment of 25.0±3.0℃
...
Discharge cut-off voltage 1.50V+/-0.05V
...

Just quickly reviewing this PDF for the Na-ion battery model: 18650E-1500 I don't see under what conditions it could be discharged and stored at three voltages of 0V  :-//
12oV4dWZCAia7vXBzQzBF9wAt1U3JWZkpk
“Let the future tell the truth, and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments. The present is theirs; the future, for which I have really worked, is mine”  - Nikola Tesla
-||-|-
 

Online Psi

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9954
  • Country: nz
Re: Sodium Ion Battery evaluation
« Reply #52 on: December 29, 2023, 03:03:53 am »
Probably just a translation thing,  if you discharge to 1.5V the amount of energy left is practically nothing anyway. And you might consider that as 'completely discharged'
Greek letter 'Psi' (not Pounds per Square Inch)
 

Offline eneuro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1528
  • Country: 00
Re: Sodium Ion Battery evaluation
« Reply #53 on: January 22, 2024, 04:59:39 pm »
if you discharge to 1.5V the amount of energy left is practically nothing anyway. And you might consider that as 'completely discharged'
I do not intend to discharge below 2.7V because the ATMEL MPU (Attiny85) is to be powered directly from this battery with BOD enabled.

HAKADI Na-ion 18650 1500mAh 3V were delivered by post at a voltage of ~2.55V   8)

« Last Edit: January 22, 2024, 05:04:40 pm by eneuro »
12oV4dWZCAia7vXBzQzBF9wAt1U3JWZkpk
“Let the future tell the truth, and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments. The present is theirs; the future, for which I have really worked, is mine”  - Nikola Tesla
-||-|-
 

Offline CobraScout

  • Newbie
  • !
  • Posts: 1
  • Country: hk
Re: Sodium Ion Battery evaluation
« Reply #54 on: February 06, 2024, 12:00:48 am »
The discharge curve is really quite different to a normal LIB (stolen from BatteryU).

The info I found said that SIBs may even be shipped completely discharged as it makes them safer to ship that way.

For sure, sodium ion battery is much safer than LIBs, see our sodium battery puncture test, no fire, no explosion...


« Last Edit: February 06, 2024, 12:05:22 am by CobraScout »
This user/company spams forums.
 
The following users thanked this post: thm_w

Offline eneuro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1528
  • Country: 00
Re: Sodium Ion Battery evaluation
« Reply #55 on: February 10, 2024, 09:16:16 pm »
The nail test on a purportedly Sodium Ion battery...
Stupid tests.
12oV4dWZCAia7vXBzQzBF9wAt1U3JWZkpk
“Let the future tell the truth, and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments. The present is theirs; the future, for which I have really worked, is mine”  - Nikola Tesla
-||-|-
 

Offline robintTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 105
  • Country: gb
Re: Sodium Ion Battery evaluation
« Reply #56 on: February 22, 2024, 05:48:14 pm »
I had disappointing results with my Hikadi Sibs 18650 1500mAh, I only got 1100MAh after 6 disch chg cycles at 1C.  Not exactly exciting performance, but maybe others will come forward with their tests - BTW I used a ZKE AP20 tester - love it.
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing in the Lithium world
 

Offline eneuro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1528
  • Country: 00
Re: Sodium Ion Battery evaluation
« Reply #57 on: February 24, 2024, 12:49:46 am »
Must be why they sold over a million before finally closing the plant down july 1990 after 41 years with only cosmetic changes.  2V 600cc did 55mph eventually  gave >60mpg. Designed to travel over a ploughed field without breaking a tray of eggs.  BTW average speed in London is 16mph :-DD.  And Wales only allows 20mph - you are just not paying attention :box:

You seem to be reinforcing my point, the 2CV is vastly superior to the Citroen Ami toy car. 
It seems that Na-ion batteries are actually used in electric cars and this is one of the reasons why I did not buy in Europe a used Dacia Spring 2021 electric car based on probably Li-ion 28kWh batteries, seeing that cars appeared on the market with Sodium-ion batteries at similar price $15k and range  Sodium-ion JAC Sodium ion Battery CAR: How Does The Sodium-Ion Battery Works:
« Last Edit: February 24, 2024, 12:52:27 am by eneuro »
12oV4dWZCAia7vXBzQzBF9wAt1U3JWZkpk
“Let the future tell the truth, and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments. The present is theirs; the future, for which I have really worked, is mine”  - Nikola Tesla
-||-|-
 
The following users thanked this post: robint

Offline robintTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 105
  • Country: gb
Re: Sodium Ion Battery evaluation
« Reply #58 on: February 24, 2024, 07:53:47 pm »
Hmm that Vid smells of way too much Uber Hype, wait till next year. SiBs just dont have the energy density yet to compete (ie <25% of Lions).  Lifepo looks promising, getting cheaper AWS.
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing in the Lithium world
 

Offline eneuro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1528
  • Country: 00
Re: Sodium Ion Battery evaluation
« Reply #59 on: February 24, 2024, 10:49:05 pm »
SiBs just dont have the energy density yet to compete (ie <25% of Lions).
Nope, Nonsense, Li-ion batteries are flammable while Na-ion does not and this is one of the main reasons why I bought Na-ion batteries for testing, because they will be charged directly from the 230VAC 50Hz at home socket.
Lithium is a hard-to-find metal on Earth and Na-ion batteries are the killer of Chinese Li-ion batteries, so it is not surprising that there will be AI-generated comments suggesting the advantage of Li-ion-based batteries in EV compared to Na-ion, but it is obvious that the future of EV is Na-ion, and Li-ion batteries will be used in devices as before, where a greater concentration of energy is needed, but the energy stored in the small Li-ion battery packs is much smaller, which eliminates the risk of very difficult to extinguish fires caused by the failure of Ev where batteries are based on Lithium and have capacity >28kWh.
YT: Lithium-ion battery fires are on the rise. Are firefighters ready?
« Last Edit: February 24, 2024, 11:31:58 pm by eneuro »
12oV4dWZCAia7vXBzQzBF9wAt1U3JWZkpk
“Let the future tell the truth, and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments. The present is theirs; the future, for which I have really worked, is mine”  - Nikola Tesla
-||-|-
 

Offline robintTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 105
  • Country: gb
Re: Sodium Ion Battery evaluation
« Reply #60 on: February 29, 2024, 06:03:19 pm »
I do hope we can get some up to date informed opinion on this board. Re-hashing very old 2017 news is hardly helpful :scared:
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing in the Lithium world
 
The following users thanked this post: thm_w

Offline johansen

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 997
Re: Sodium Ion Battery evaluation
« Reply #61 on: March 07, 2024, 04:23:15 pm »
I do hope we can get some up to date informed opinion on this board. Re-hashing very old 2017 news is hardly helpful :scared:

So far this year, the FDNY says 66 fires have been started by lithium-ion batteries, killing five people. Last year, the city saw 216 fires and six deaths related to the batteries

https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/special-reports/e-bike-battery-fires

"Published June 5, 2023
2023 deaths have already surpassed last year's.
NEW YORK (BRAIN) — More people in New York City have died so far this year because of lithium-ion battery fires than all of last year, according to recently released Fire Department of New York statistics.

Entering June, according to FDNY data, there were nine deaths, and 64 injuries attributed to fires sparked by lithium-ion batteries. So far, 65 structural and 32 non-structural fires and 97 investigations into lithium-ion battery fires have occurred."

so it looks like things really took off in 2023. this year statistically NYC will have around 20 deaths if the trend continues.
« Last Edit: March 07, 2024, 04:33:24 pm by johansen »
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf