I use a plain old Siemens 6ES5985-0AA11 UV Eraser.
It works with a OSRAM HNS 10W/U OFR bulb with E27 socket https://www.lamptech.co.uk/Documents/Brochures/Osram%20-%20Liste%20Entkiemung%20-%201969-IV%20DE.pdf.
The bulb is placed 20 mm below the EPROM surface.
There is a timer for 0 to 30 minutes. A sticker says, 30 minutes are needed to fully erase eproms.
Edit: I added the characteristic wavelengths of this UV bulb, measured with Spectryx Blue-Box and Octave (script edited by Claude-Code).
The important wavelength 253,7 nm is missing in my measurement due to the limited wavelength range of the Spectryx device (350-1000nm).
Many thanks
@JimKnopf for these technical details about the electroded UV lamp, its length, power, distance between EPROM surface and bulb. This will help me do some computations where I'll renormalize the surface radiation because induction (electrodeless) UV lamp have much bigger diameter tube than electroded UV tube.
As for the UV spectrum, my UV induction bulb do have lot of 254 nm because they're ozone free and meant to purifiy air. There are models which generate ozone with 185 nm, in that case they're used for water purification and odor removal. If you are interested, attached datasheet from the manufacturers showing different wattage, dimension of these bulbs inclduing my 300W but never provided the 150W.
Erasing EPROMs with a 4 W UV-C fluorescent lamp takes about 15 minutes. A 150 or 300 W UV-C lamp might be total overkill.
Yes I agree hence my post #1 to see capture recommendation or get an idea of power level, duration of UV exposure and distance.
Photocurrent will be a problem. Applying bias to the EPROM while it is under strong UV will cause unpredictable behaviour, maybe even damage.
I doubt your bulbs and ballast will like being rapidly switched off and back on, so if you want to do Renate's proposed erase test you will need some sort of mechanical shutter to cover the EPROM window before the programmer applies Vcc and other signals to the EPROM.
I still do not understand the 2 post from Renate so my plan is to proceed from the UV eraser data provided by members in the thread then renormalize or intuit a UV flashing procedure.
As for the possible damage of bulb and ballast, I'm not worried because these are induction (electrodeless) plasma technology. I've worked a lot on this forgotten technology wether visible lighting or UV lighting, you can switch on or off, actually you can dim with pulse skip technology in the ballast. There are no electrodes in the lamp, all the HF energy (typically 250 kHz) is transferred by induction to the plasma vessel thanks to power ferrite. This is why this technology can last 50 khrs and in practice 100 khrs without any failure compared to electroded plasma lighting.