Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 Next
1
Test Equipment / Re: Siglent SDS3000X HD and upgraded SDS1000X HD
« Last post by hpw on Today at 06:57:51 am »
Hi,
The latter.
If you only have one of them in the house and it's gone, you'll probably notice it sooner. ;)

So happy with today's ISO9001 company's so be prepared
2
Test Equipment / Re: SDS800X HD Wanted Features
« Last post by ebastler on Today at 06:52:53 am »
I cant find a way to edit my votes, can you???

Right, that was the other restriction I had meant to mention.
3
I was a bit late discovering this game, having seen it on the sci-fi TV series "Fringe" being played by young Olivia.
4
Test Equipment / Re: SDS800X HD Wanted Features
« Last post by eTobey on Today at 06:49:08 am »
The forum offers a poll !!!! I suggested this a few times!

I don't think I ever saw a poll here where more than one option could be selected. It has alway been "radio buttons", where you can select 1 out of N answers. Hence I assume that "any number out of N" or "up to M votes per user" polls are not supported.

And you don't want one separate poll per feature -- which would also mean one thread per feature, since only one poll per thread is possible.

Sometimes believing aint working:
I just "tried" it out:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/news/test-425857/

I cant find a way to edit my votes, can you???
5
News/Suggestions/Help / test
« Last post by eTobey on Today at 06:47:55 am »
Checking the poll functionality
6
Test Equipment / Re: SDS800X HD Wanted Features
« Last post by ebastler on Today at 06:45:31 am »
The forum offers a poll !!!! I suggested this a few times!

I don't think I ever saw a poll here where more than one option could be selected. It has alway been "radio buttons", where you can select 1 out of N answers. Hence I assume that "any number out of N" or "up to M votes per user" polls are not supported.

And you don't want one separate poll per feature -- which would also mean one thread per feature, since only one poll per thread is possible.
7
Test Equipment / Re: SDS800X HD Wanted Features
« Last post by eTobey on Today at 06:44:47 am »
Suggested feature:

Measuring with two or even multiple gates:
If one wants to measure 2 things, that can not be placed into one gate, the measurements are not possible.
See picture:
Measure level at "A", and measure width of negative level on "B".

Make more gates, where each measurement can be assigned to. If its not possible to implement in running mode, implement it in history mode. I already realized this functionality in a python script:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/using-scpi-with-python-via-telnet-to-connect-with-a-siglent-scope/msg5469892/#msg5469892

8
Who needs them?

Have you ever actually cut a thread on a lathe? And it HAD to be compatible with all the others of the same basic description that are out there. The details of thread forms are fairly well available, but by the time you finish researching and UNDERSTANDING all of them, for JUST ONE TYPE OF THREAD, your head will be spinning. I know, I did work from the published standards a time or two and it is not easy. Whenever I can I just rough out the thread form and then use a die or tap of the appropriate class of fit to finish it. There are times when spending even $50 or $100 on a die or tap that will only be used once is a great choice to make.

And that's just thread forms, which are fairly simple. There are so many other mechanical standards.

Have I spent money on mechanical standards? You bet I have. I have not one, but three copies of Machinery's Handbook, two paper and ink and one in PDF format on my computer. And I have additional printed books with standards in them. But there are standards that I have never had copies of. And probably never will unless I have a paying job that requires them.

But this is an electronic board. Electronic standards? Yup, they are out there. I spent over 45 years working as a TV engineer and had to know and follow things like the FCC Rules and Regulations. Most of the TV stations where I worked subscribed to a service that provided them in a thick binder and periodic updates that had to be inserted in it. That cost some money, but I think the FCC itself published them for cost but keeping their binder was more difficult and time consuming.

And electrical standards; I do have a copy of the US NEC. It is out of date but I needed it for a project so I originally bought it new. A professional electrician would probably need to buy a new copy each year or two.

There's a tremendous amount of published standards and YES, they are needed and USED.



Interesting,the short form link didnt make that clear. As  tom66 says it would be nice if british standards were to follow suit, little chance of that happening.

Who needs them, unless you're still using Whitworth threads and measuring speed in furlongs-per-fortnight.
9
Test Equipment / Re: SDS800X HD Wanted Features
« Last post by eTobey on Today at 06:39:10 am »
People can look through the Wanted Features Summary,

 But the forum does not offer a better meachnism, I'm afraid.


How could i forget this?  :palm:

The forum offers a poll !!!! I suggested this a few times!
10
You are totally right. I measured 2 capacitors, the ESR and capacity are normal. Then I changed the traxial connector. the offset become much worse |O.  Maybe my cloves are not clean :(,or the connector from Taobao(Aliexpress) is bad >:(
Next week is labor day, we will have 5 days holiday, I want to clean the original connector and put it back.


Today, I received my  Keithley 617 with very good condition. it was made in 1991 or 1992, and last cal time is 1999. when I power on it, on current and 2pA mode, no input, the read is change from 20 counts to 300. Now, I have work to do. ;D. maybe need clean the pcb first and change the capacitors .

I would only attempt cleaning if the PCB is really dirty and changing capacitor if you really suspect them to be bad. Also always wear clean cloves when manipulating the input board.

But what is the problem exactly with your unit ? if it's simply a offset after removing Zero Check, check the manual page 7-5 chapter 7.4.8 "Input Offset Adjustment".
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 Next