1
Projects, Designs, and Technical Stuff / Re: (Yet Another) DIY Multislope ADC
« Last post by Kleinstein on Today at 09:15:25 am »It is not a good idea to have different resistors for the input and reference currents. To get compensation of the switch resistance TC they should be the same.
Instead of a smaller resistor for the references a higher voltage (e.g. 14 V = 2 x raw reference) is the better way.
The times for RDN and RDNP should not get down all the way to zero. It would be more like 4 or 5 cylces as a minimum to allow for settling. For the result a constant added part is not important as one will subtract a zero reading anyway.
For the uncertainty the contributions from the parts (run-up, rundown difference of reference, rundown sum of reference and the residual ADC) is the relevant factor. With 1 PLC (20ms) the runup step are some 1/2000 for the full scale. With longer integration even more comes from the run-up. The run-down makes up some 2 run-up steps and in the current configuration some 120 cycles, the residual charge ADC is for 1 of the rundown steps or some 10 ppm of the FS.
Instead of a smaller resistor for the references a higher voltage (e.g. 14 V = 2 x raw reference) is the better way.
The times for RDN and RDNP should not get down all the way to zero. It would be more like 4 or 5 cylces as a minimum to allow for settling. For the result a constant added part is not important as one will subtract a zero reading anyway.
For the uncertainty the contributions from the parts (run-up, rundown difference of reference, rundown sum of reference and the residual ADC) is the relevant factor. With 1 PLC (20ms) the runup step are some 1/2000 for the full scale. With longer integration even more comes from the run-up. The run-down makes up some 2 run-up steps and in the current configuration some 120 cycles, the residual charge ADC is for 1 of the rundown steps or some 10 ppm of the FS.