compressing natural gas can't be compared to pumping sea water at 75atmospheres of pressure.
Correct, it can't. Subsea natural gas compression is much more complex.
Hydrocarbon reservoirs don't produce nice clean gas ready to pipe to consumers. If you’re lucky it's a condensate mix with minimal hydrogen sulphide, so hydrogen metal embrittlement isn't a big problem over the long term. Regardless, the multi-phase flow needs to be separated into gas and liquid before the compressors. The gas passes through the turbine compressor while the liquid goes through a centrifugal pump. Then they are mixed again into the export line. All these pressure and temperature changes means hydrate formation can spoil the fun, so mitigations for that need to be designed in. Then throw in some magnetically levitated bearings because you’re aiming for decades long operational life in harsh media. So, yeah, pumping some sea water is much simpler.
what was the cost of the pump assembly ?
Subsea gas compression is a relatively new technology with only a handful in actual operation. The complexity and costs are high.
it sure makes economical sense when pumping natural gas, but let's be realistic.. we're talking about 5MW of pumped hydro with similar cost for the pump assembly (of course manufacturing at large scale would bring the cost down a bit).
The cost of a water turbine, relatively well understood technology would be much less. Is it economically viable? Neither you nor I know at this time.
btw.. the numbers from that reality you linked are terrifying...
Ah, your terrified. That explains the lack of logical thought
lifetime 20 years... what ?? why ? concrete lasts much longer ! why only 20 years then probably the maintenance issues i'm talking about are the reason of the short lifetime ?
Calm down and think logically. The document did not say 20 year life for the concrete. You're right, concrete can and does last many decades in sea water, particularly in benign seabed conditions.
The pump/generator and controls package would likely need replaced several times in that timespan.
concrete structures is definitely not "green".
Humans have produced a
horrific amount of concrete, and with it a horrific climate-changing amount of carbon dioxide. The question is whether the CO2 required for the production of these spheres is less than they save over their lifetime. Demand for concrete globally will continue and likely increase, so hopefully we can find new ways to
produce it more sustainably.
I am just making the point that your responses are generally emotive with little to no effort in the understanding of technical detail. Please use reddit for such shallow discussions, not an engineering forum. Subsea pumped hydro may or may not be a viable solution for grid energy balancing. There may be better solutions, but it has enough merit to warrant investigation.