Heathkit Capacitor Tester IT-22 from 1965

[Spartan1]

Hello fellow techies.

I recently bought a Heathkit Capacitor tester it-22.
Noticed weird readings from the eye.
Decided to pull it apart and basically do some voltage tests first.

This transformer in it is a 240v instead of the 125v in the circuit diagram I have posted.
The main concern I have, are the outputs of the transformer are different to the circuit diagram.

1) My transformer output is 14v
Should be 12.6v.

2) Next transformer output is just over 600v.
Should be 540v.

3) Next transformer output is 58v.
Should be 55v.

Wondering if these wrong readings are acceptable for the 1629 tube.
Thanks in advance 

[wasedadoc]

I'd be tempted to put a suitable series resistor in the tube heater supply.

[BrokenYugo]

C1 is likely a "death cap" and should be replaced with a class Y safety cap. Other leaky paper caps probably causing the behavior issues.

Might be more like a 220V primary, good enough if it runs cool, though filament/heater should be within 5% for good cathode lifespan. Wasedadoc's suggestion of a dropping resistor for the heater is a good one.

[Wallace Gasiewicz]

 I do not think the filament voltage would cause immediate problems but high voltage here might shorten the tube life.  Did you measure across the filament wires? The schematic calls for a VTVM, so I think a high impedance modern multimeter should be adequateAlso take the volt readings with a grain of salt. Notice the primary to the transformer has quite a volt range specified. Quite common for line voltages to be specified this way since they did vary even more than that specified. The secondaries will be affected also although they do not specify a range. I know that you are using 240.
What sort of magic eye problems are you experiencing?

Edit : https://www.radiomuseum.org/tubes/tube_1629.html

[Spartan1]

What sort of magic eye problems are you experiencing?

Hi Wallace,

I was getting the same readings using a new electrolytic capacitor, and a faulty swollen electrolytic capacitor 

Showing good for both capacitors.

Not shorted and Not open 

[Wallace Gasiewicz]

I think your cap tester only shows if something is really bad, Open or Short, Heath had other testers that showed leakage and cap values. Yours does not.

[BrokenYugo]

Yeah, read the manual carefully, this is a very simple reactance based tester, no leakage test, reactance must be over 10 ohms@50/60Hz for the short test to be accurate, open test just tries to push ~19Mhz though the DUT and if something gets through it'll read good.

[FIXITNOW2003]

AER you using a modern DMM to read these voltages ? the values in the manual would have be done with a much old style of test meter which would have loaded the circuit a little bit giving lower voltages , try using an old AVO 7 or similar test meter

[TheDefpom]

I believe the transformers in various Heathkit gear were either 110V or 220V, so on 240V you will see ~10% higher voltages.

Also make sure you test all of the resistors, they tend to drift high with age, they are probably 10% types so make sure they are within that tolerance, unless they are 5% of course.

[Wallace Gasiewicz]

Schematic posted calls for a Vacuum Tube Volt Meter  VTVM.   

The readings should be very close to a modern High Impedance voltmeter, Like a Fluke Multimeter.   

However the voltages you measures are kinda what I expect. The voltages I measure an old equipment like this are seldom exactly what is stated.

[TimFox]

A VTVM of that era would have 11 megohm input resistance, close to a typical 10 megohm modern DMM.

[wasedadoc]

AER you using a modern DMM to read these voltages ? the values in the manual would have be done with a much old style of test meter which would have loaded the circuit a little bit giving lower voltages , try using an old AVO 7 or similar test meter

Good analogue meters at that time were 20,000 Ohms/Volt. Even not so good ones were 10,000 Ohms/Volt. So drawing 50uA or 100uA respectively at full scale deflection. Those loadings in that circuit are totally insignificant.