I saw you had some criticisms of the agilent MSO7000 series scopes, so I'd be very interested in some more specifics, as I am looking at picking one of these up used.
Indeed amongst other scopes, we have some 7000As, one DSOX3000 and several newer and older LeCroys at work. And while e.g. A WaveSurfer 64MXs and a MSO7054A were roughly in the same price range when we bought them, I like the LeCroys much more even though they are louder, boot slower and have less waveforms per second.
I currently have a really nice, older LeCroy (WavePro WP7200a), but it has no MSO option, and while I originally was using it for medical imaging projects (MRI, ultrasound), I'm now wanting to target embedded applications where the MSO option would be useful. I do have RS232/SPI/I2C decode, but no trigger.
Lately I'm not so convinced any more that MSO is really so desirable. There were some specific topics in the past where I needed 8 or even 16 channels at once, but nowadays, I tend to prefer a solid 4ch scope instead of messing with digital channels even for e.g. SPI analysis. And when I absolutely need to do a complex SPI analysis with more than 4ch, I just use an ultra-cheap USB LA instead ... even though I have a 10k€ Agilent desktop LA sitting on my bench.
I tried to use the MSO extension once with our Lecroy Wavesurfer and it was close to unusable. The integration of the digital channels is a bit better for the MSO7000A we have, but activating them cuts down bandwidth and memory, so I haven't used that for years either.
I am also looking for a bit better responsiveness and boot time compared with the LeCroy.
I had looked at the newer LeCroy scopes, but the prices are out of my range. Since the MSO7104A scopes have been going at about $5-8K on Ebay (Certiprime at 8K), I have been seriously looking into these. Naturally, I scanned the EEVblog (and the rest of the web) for honest comments, and you're the first to really pan these scopes.
I think all current LeCroys are windows based. At least all that we have are either based on XP or Win7. So they take a while to boot and they are quite loud and produce a lot of warm air. And I mean A LOT. After all they are full windows PCs with all benefits and drawbacks. And the update rate can be slowish for large time scales and large memory depths.
In this regard, the Agilent scopes shine. The MS7000A we have are quite silent ... not really dead silent, but much more silent than the LeCroys. They also boot up pretty quickly. And they are a bit easier to use for newbies as they simply lack so many features that the LeCroys have. Besides, the update rate is always quick.
That being said, of course everybody has his/her preferences and different scopes might be useful for different jobs. My job is embedded automotive development and apart from the usual protocol analysis and analog diagnostic issues I sometimes need to prove certain timings with statistical measurements for jitter analysis etc. And this is where the LeCroys shine and where the Agilents suck. All Agilent scopes I ever tried measured in the screen buffer and thus you can't really trust automatic measurements of periods etc. Besides, the automatic measurements and trigger possibilities are extremely limited if compared to a LeCroy WaveRunner or even Wavesurfer. And the manual measurements are also limited due to restriction to the display buffer. There are indeed lots of things you simply can't measure with an MSO7000 and that we need to measure at work.
Generally, If you look at all the options and possibilities of a WaveRunner and compare it to the few simply menus of an MSO7000A, the MSO7000A looks really poor and basic.
Besides, there are several smaller issues that I don't like about the MSO7000 series or Agilent scopes in general. E.g. the MSO7000 doesn't show the current sample rate on the main screen which every other scope (including e.g. the DSOX3000) does. And I find it most annoying that it doesn't allow you to switch between auto and normal trigger mode with a dedicated button (the DSOX3000 allows to configure a general purpose button for this). Last but not least there is no way of gating measurement other than using the zoom window. Again, while this might be a smaller issue for lots of people, it makes certain measurements nearly impossible for me.
Also I always found it hard to believe that the 8Mpts sample memory were really comparable to statements of other vendors. E.g. our smallest WaveSurfer has 12Mpts of memory. Which sounds like only 50% more. Still, with the WaveSurfer, I can easily record hundreds of milliseconds and still zoom in to see all details of a 1MBaud SPI transmission, while on the MSO7000 this is not possible or only with the segmented memory feature. It seems to me that 8Mpts is a very optimistic declaration based on a best case scenario with interleaving and all.
Of course not all is good about LeCroys and not all is bad about Agilents. Agilent scopes have this analog feeling to them. So people who love analog scopes love Agilents. Then again, as digital storage scopes with focus on measurement and single trigger capabilities, they leave to be desired IMHO. Also if you used the touchscreen of a LeCroy WaveSurfer/WaveRunner once, it's kinda hard to go back to a "normal" scope. Even worse, the WaveScan and LabNotebook features are really pretty much brilliant and the MSO7000 has absolutely nothing that even goes in that direction.
This being said, I watched some used LeCroy WaveSurfers on eBay going for ~4k€, so they are not completely out of reach. But honestly, for my home stuff they are a bit over the top and I wouldn't like the fan noise and warm air at home, so I decided to get a tiny HMO2024 instead which is good enough for me despite of some minor issues and limitations.