I didn't realise the WE1010NA was only $110 from (sold by) Amazon. MSRP is $197.50 which is why it didn't make my short list.
It won't heat as fast as the Metcal, but $110 is really cheap if it is any good. Tips are inexpensive too. I'll think about it. I did quickly look at WT1010 but it is just over $500.
The entry level model of the ET series has been in that price range for years now, at least from Amazon. I notice that the power is up to 70 watts, so double most WTCP style stations.
I used an ET style station decades ago, but I think it was broken, which was why I ended up with it. It was much lower power and I was never happy with it, but again, I think it was broken.
I have never used a METCAL style with RF direct heating. I just noticed that the common METCAL stations are fixed temperature, which is good for production. If I upgraded, then I would definitely want continuously variable temperature control.
Nothing outright wrong with it no, but its ancient technology and very long tip distance. It will perform similarly to FX888.
The grip is moderately sized, so it could be passable for SMD, though I prefer much thinner.
How many different technologies are there? Ignoring everything which does not have closed loop control of the tip temperature:
1. Resistively heated Weller Magnastat, which relies on the curie temperature of the tip. I still use these. Did anybody other than Weller ever use this method?
2. Resistively heated continuous temperature control, like the Weller ET series. I think the Weller ET series uses a thermocouple.
3. RF heated with temperature controlled by the curie temperature of the tip, which is the original METCAL design.
4. RF heated continuous temperature control, like the newer and more expensive METCAL stations? Also uses a thermocouple.
RF heating of the tip should always have higher performance because of lower effective thermal resistance, but it comes at a much higher cost. Amazon says $400 for the METCAL GT90, and I do not see many options for different tips.