Hi,
I'll try to summarize the topic.
If there are any changes or inaccuracies, please let me know.
-
This link has a disassembly of the Amphenol connector:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/reviews/pace-footswitch-connector-for-desoldering-station/
Important:
Renumber the pins of the 8-pin connector correctly, per discussion above.
Change “connector (pins)” to “plug (male)” in the connector descriptions. We already know they’re connectors, but what’s important is whether you’re documenting the plug or the jack. (You probably already know this, but just to be clear on typical English terminology, in case you’re not a native speaker: “Plug”=the part on the cable that’s usually more mobile; “jack” or “socket”* =the part on the panel, except when “inline jack” (or “inline socket”)=cable-mounted jack. Plugs and jacks can have male or female, or mixed, contacts.)
Add a note whether the contact arrangements are as viewed from the plug or the jack, and from termination side or mating face. (The C091 catalog, for example, has the layouts numbered with the “view from termination side of male contact insert”. I would standardize on this.)
Not critical, but nice:
Where you list the SX-90, you can note that it’s SX-80/90/100 — they’re electrically identical.
Remove the apostrophe from “connector’s” in the title.
Fix “channal AUX” to “AUX channels”.
Fix “TT65 tweez” to either “TT65 tweezers” or “TT65”. Make the handpiece titles uniform, either listing the function on all of them, or none.
*because “socket” is often used to denote the female contact (e.g. pins and sockets), I prefer to use “jack” or “receptacle” to mean the receiving role of the connector as a whole, and “socket” to refer to the receiving role of the contact. None of this is strict rules, this is just my suggestion for unambiguous terminology.