Well I got a question, it says the spring thingy could be used to cancel residual L+R. Determined I should not wait a week because I am so bored
When I put the fixture together and short it out with the spring gold elbow thing, the inductance at say 50MHz reads something like 0.6nH
When I put on the grounding skirt/terminator, the inductance actually reads higher, at ~1nH
Is this correct or is something messed up?
I figured when you screw the skirt on, the inductance would be lower then the fixture shorting itself. But it turns out that if I did cancellation, I would get negative inductance.
Is it only for use with a part and the methadology breaks down with a self short circuited fixture?
Like, if I store the ground terminator values, then actually measure a part, it will be more accurate, even if it does not agree with the fixture being shorted out by the gold spring loaded elbow piece?
At 500MHz
1) test fixture shorted by itself : 1.1nH + 100-120 mili ohms resistance (varies)
2) test fixture shorted by grounding terminator skirt : 1.58 nH + 75 miliohms (very repeatable down to maybe 2 miliohms).
So the L is higher but the R is lower on the L + R measurement.
is this right? why the hell is residual inductance higher with the special shorting terminator then with the shorted fixture. Is shorting the fixture by itself some how bogus and or has a error?
Like just looking at it, when I see the fixture gold angle block pushed up against the post with the spring, it seems to me like the inductance has to be lower then with the skirt. The skirt is like big, it fits nicely but its still the size of a coin. I don't think the measurement is incorrect. Is it just a general case? Or is it only meant to be used with the 2x clip, rather then the plunger?'
https://www.picclickimg.com/ZWQAAOSw7K5kqcHM/HP-Agilent-16092A-Spring-Clip-Fixture.webpI just can't see the grounding skirt having a lower inductance then the shorted plunger?! I could understand that the skirt has a lower resistance, since there is like 30 points of contact, rather then some angle piece being wedged against a post.. but inductance just must be higher no matter how wide you make it because its damn big. You could make it 1/2 as big and it would still work. Its over sized as far as I can tell.
And yes its the correct one, I know there is a different skirt for the binding post fixture. This is the skirt for the 92A, not the 93. Infact I would call this a ball room gown from the 1300's of spain, not a skirt. This skirt would be more then modest even in the 1800s. Explain this to me. Why is it so big. its the size of a quarter but you can probobly make it the size of a dime.

And the plunger/gold angle is fine, I have a few of them now because of failed aquisitions. They all read very similar when I swap em.
Is the grounding skirt only for the 92A fixture configured with the big top slide piece and NOT the plunger, or should it be used anyway for real parts measurements?!