I just use 0 ohm resistors. At HF and VHF, I don't think it adds enough inductance to be significant. You can add these to an Elsie model. After you have the circuit design done using the topology in Elsie, just edit the circuit and add a stage using Insert Part Prior to This Stage. Put an inductor there. Anyway, the parts you buy and install will likely have tolerances greater than the reactance from a nH or two that may result from the 0 ohm resistors. Elsie is a great tool for modeling this. Add the inductor as I described. Then set the stepsize values and run the Monte Carlo analysis to see just how much effect the variation has. If you find it to be significant, just add a bit of capacitance in series to offset the reactance. Just calculate the amount of capacitance needed to produce a similar magnitude of reactance as the inductance at the frequency of interest.
I seldom stick to the design Elsie comes up with initially. I always set limits and run the optimizations several times, improving the filter to meet my specific needs and to minimize sensitivity to the higher tolerance parts. A couple of Elsie hints: check the transmission angle to make sure you don't get a 180 degree phase shift at the frequencies you are using. For some modes, this will distort your signal. You can put limits and run the optimization to correct this. Check the return or VSWR and set limits if you want to control reflections during optimization. I also sometimes use the 'swap end - end' feature and check return or impedance from the tail end of the filter, too, if I'm concerned about that -- for example, with filters used in diplexers. And, as Yansi suggests, set reasonable Q factors in the Elsie analysis tab.
By the way, another very useful tool is the free Iowa Hills Smith Chart software. I use it often. It gives the benefits of a Smith Chart without having to spend too much time learning how to use it. It's great for coming up with impedance matching circuits.