I found the video a while ago, and now im looking for an oscilloscope that one thing has been rattling around in my head.
At first i thought that the Tektronix approach to include probe loading would be "better", but now thinking about it, having an understanding about how taking the measurements are influencing the DUT, and be able to take that into account appears to be "better" as it allows you to develop a more thorough understanding of how measurements are made, rather than hiding it from you, and blindly trusting whats on the display.
From the Tektronix brief David linked:
Suppose you have a perfect 1VDC signal that you want to measure. When you measure this signal with a probe, you expect the probe to measure 1VDC. If probe loading caused the signal level to drop to 0.95V, would you want the probe to read 1VDC or 0.95VDC? The Tektronix philosophy is that you want to see a 1V signal. Agilent’s philosophy is that you want to see the 0.95V signal.
Would it really make that much of a difference, or is all this a load of marketing rubbish and not actually relevant in the real world?
Taking their example, if you knew that it was a perfect 1VDC signal, and you callibrated an Agilent scope to read 1VDC, then would you not have achieved exactly what Tektronix do?