I've taken apart and re-adjusted the attenuator compensation and CMRR of such a thing (apparently something in the input divider changed its behaviour over usage and time).
There's also a downside: no one checks the probes for compensation and CMRR, not even when they get calibrated in a external cal lab :-(
It's perfectly possible to pull a probe out of the storage box with a fresh cal sticker on it and real bad compensation / CMRR. Some months ago, I volunteered an re-adjusted a bunch of them - again no one noticed the change.
The probe simply is used to measure and document the gate signals, no matter if they are misread by bad compensation or CMRR.
...
BTW, the probes I re-adjusted have standard SMT components (1206 planar resistors and caps) for the high voltage divider (several components in series). That's quite cheap ass style, yes it works as long as you don't treat them with high dV/dt rates and you don't have high voltage transients. The standard resistors and capacitors degrade slowly over time (and change their values) if you treat them this way (which is well within their safety ratings, no specs exceeded), leading to bad compensation and CMRR. Then one says, they are worth each dollar they cost - yes maybe in terms of safety they provide, but no, not in terms of performance and long time stability I do expect from such an expensive accessory.
If suitable components are used, then usually it is the printed circuit board material which changes (or starts out bad) screwing up the high impedance compensated dividers. Tektronix called this "hook" and before qualifying standard fiberglass weave printed circuit board material, early on they used boards made from plastics like polysulfone (amber looking) for their high impedance attenuators and later a white board material that I have not identified yet.
Analog Devices mentions it briefly on page 10 of
Analog Dialogue Volume 17, Number 2, 1983 and page 58 of
chapter 9 of The Data Conversion Handbook 2005 but the best reference is still the Tektornix article "Getting Rid of Hook - The Hidden PC-Board Capacitance" in Electronics magazine October 12, 1978 which I have available through a
bittorrent magnet link. It is too large for Dave's forum unless I edit it and the scan is in bad enough shape already so I left it alone although I am pretty good at cleaning up old document scans.
I really like these probes, even if I don't need the high safety ratings (other people here need that), but when it comes to real perfomance, it's better to have your own that has never been used by the power people and lab rats before - they simply do not take care of their equipment.
Jim Williams had something to say about maladjusted probe compensation:
"The translation of this statement is to hide the probe when you are not using it. If anyone wants to borrow it, look straight at them, shrug your shoulders and say you don't know where it is. This is decidedly dishonest, but eminently practical. Those finding this morally questionable may wish to re-examine their attitude after producing a day's worth of worthless data with a probe that was unknowingly readjusted." - page 12 of Linear Technology application note 49)