Author Topic: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)  (Read 44854 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
It's been sitting in my office for weeks, but now that it's been officially launched, I'm officially allowed to share  :)

Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 
The following users thanked this post: nikifena, egonotto, thm_w, Bud, Muxr, Rich@RohdeScopesUSA, Markus2801A, luudee, fichamba

Offline Someone

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4531
  • Country: au
    • send complaints here
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2022, 11:46:20 pm »
Nice to see manufacturers continuing to push the envelope of specifications in multiple directions (not just a one trick pony), including details like more offset range.

Do share pricing when you can.
 
The following users thanked this post: Rich@RohdeScopesUSA, pdenisowski, RBBVNL9

Offline TheDefpom

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 707
  • Country: nz
  • YouTuber Nerd - I Fix Stuff
    • The Defpom's Channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2022, 11:46:39 pm »
R&S could send me one to review… just sayin 🤓
Cheers Scott

Check out my Electronics Repair, Mailbag, or Review Videos at https://www.youtube.com/TheDefpom
 
The following users thanked this post: Rich@RohdeScopesUSA, salvagedcircuitry, RBBVNL9

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #3 on: September 28, 2022, 12:09:29 am »
R&S could send me one to review… just sayin 🤓

I'd send you mine if I didn't already have a huge list of things I need to do with it :)
Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26907
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #4 on: September 28, 2022, 01:43:34 am »
The specs look really good! Full HD resolution screen as well.

Just wondering whether this model also uses decimated data for math or that it is possible to use the actual acquired data.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 
The following users thanked this post: Rich@RohdeScopesUSA, pdenisowski

Offline 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6662
  • Country: hr
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #5 on: September 28, 2022, 04:25:02 am »
Decimation (assuming there are excess samples, of course) always occurs before any math processing*, and I believe this is the case for all digital oscilloscopes.
Nope, it doesn't occur always before any math processing and is not the case for all digital oscilloscopes.

Nice looking machine!! Looking forward to more info!
 
The following users thanked this post: JPortici

Offline tv84

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3221
  • Country: pt
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #6 on: September 28, 2022, 08:49:52 am »
The USB ports casings looks cheap. No matter what you say, R&S could have done much better.

Otherwise it looks good and I expect it to be a new comparison reference. Let's see the price.
 

Offline BU508A

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4527
  • Country: de
  • Per aspera ad astra
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #7 on: September 28, 2022, 10:57:34 am »
I've attached the data sheet of the MXO4.
There is also a nice brochure online (19.1MByte).
Can be downloaded here.
“Chaos is found in greatest abundance wherever order is being sought. It always defeats order, because it is better organized.”            - Terry Pratchett -
 

Offline BU508A

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4527
  • Country: de
  • Per aspera ad astra
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #8 on: September 28, 2022, 11:00:08 am »
The USB ports casings looks cheap. No matter what you say, R&S could have done much better.

Otherwise it looks good and I expect it to be a new comparison reference. Let's see the price.

AlliCE has some prices online:
https://allice.de/rohde-schwarz/rohde-schwarz-msox4-oszilloskope-mxo44-next-generation-oscilloscope/

Edit:
Screenshot:
« Last Edit: September 28, 2022, 11:02:59 am by BU508A »
“Chaos is found in greatest abundance wherever order is being sought. It always defeats order, because it is better organized.”            - Terry Pratchett -
 
The following users thanked this post: Someone

Offline Domitronic

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 102
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #9 on: September 28, 2022, 11:23:46 am »

This really looks nice and interesting. Will there be more options available like Ethernet compliance tests? Right now there are only some serial decoders, AWG and bode plot.

 

Offline tv84

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3221
  • Country: pt
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, thm_w, tooki, jusaca, Exosia, Weston

Offline Domitronic

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 102
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #11 on: September 28, 2022, 12:23:59 pm »

As usual, it was a nice ride while it lasted. :)


Well, if you compare the 200MHz version its "only" a factor of 2 compared to a Siglent SDS2204X HD  ;)

Honestly, i think the pricing is decent when compared to Tek Series 4 or Kesight 4000. Lecroy 4000HD might be a lot cheaper due to special offers but not with regular pricing.
 

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26907
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #12 on: September 28, 2022, 12:32:10 pm »
Just wondering whether this model also uses decimated data for math or that it is possible to use the actual acquired data.

Decimation (assuming there are excess samples, of course) always occurs before any math processing*, and I believe this is the case for all digital oscilloscopes.
No. For example: GW Instek, Lecroy, Siglent and Tektronix use the acquired data to perform math on. Typically you can choose to do math on the full memory record, the screen portion or between cursors. This means that regardless of the zoom level, you always get the same result from measurements and math. When I did testing of the filter functions on the RTM3004, I noticed that these show odd behaviour due to decimating the data. The decimation makes the filter functions far less usefull. I get that decimation makes doing measurements & math faster but it also means data is being thrown away and it makes it necessary to hint the user that the results may not be accurate.
« Last Edit: September 28, 2022, 12:35:32 pm by nctnico »
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline Rich@RohdeScopesUSA

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 457
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #13 on: September 28, 2022, 02:03:45 pm »
Early look and teardown by AddOhms for those interested:



We're working to get Dave and Shahriar permanent units as well - we're still starting to get them shipped out.  Hope they'll have them shortly (@Dave - Tristen will be in touch if he hasn't already been).

-Rich
« Last Edit: September 28, 2022, 02:05:33 pm by Rich@RohdeScopesUSA »
 
The following users thanked this post: nctnico, BU508A, Micke, salvagedcircuitry, citizenrich

Offline maxwell3e10

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 869
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #14 on: September 28, 2022, 02:57:01 pm »
If the waveform update rate is really high for all settings then this maybe the first scope that has both high resolution and fast waveform update rate (>1 MS/sec). My question would be how fast it can perform waveform average? Maximum is 16M averages, how long would that take?
« Last Edit: September 28, 2022, 03:31:54 pm by maxwell3e10 »
 

Offline Black Phoenix

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1129
  • Country: hk
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #15 on: September 28, 2022, 05:12:46 pm »
Early look and teardown by AddOhms for those interested:



We're working to get Dave and Shahriar permanent units as well - we're still starting to get them shipped out.  Hope they'll have them shortly (@Dave - Tristen will be in touch if he hasn't already been).

-Rich

I could use a permanent unit too...

Joking, I'm no one of influencer or reviewer to have a brand send me something that although I have use for I can't show, so no increasing sales for the brand.

Although yes it would be good to have one...
« Last Edit: September 28, 2022, 05:17:21 pm by Black Phoenix »
 
The following users thanked this post: Rich@RohdeScopesUSA

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26907
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #16 on: September 28, 2022, 05:23:24 pm »
If the waveform update rate is really high for all settings then this maybe the first scope that has both high resolution and fast waveform update rate (>1 MS/sec).
And don't forget deep memory... Keysight is having a very bad day today.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Offline Domitronic

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 102
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #17 on: September 28, 2022, 05:43:06 pm »
Early look and teardown by AddOhms for those interested:

-Rich

In the video he says this is a replacement of the RTA4000 series. Would be nice to see some of the technology trickle down to a future MXO 3 or MXO 2 series if they also plan to replace RTB2000 and RTM3000.

« Last Edit: September 28, 2022, 05:44:53 pm by Domitronic »
 
The following users thanked this post: Rich@RohdeScopesUSA

Offline Rich@RohdeScopesUSA

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 457
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #18 on: September 28, 2022, 06:29:11 pm »
Early look and teardown by AddOhms for those interested:

-Rich

In the video he says this is a replacement of the RTA4000 series. Would be nice to see some of the technology trickle down to a future MXO 3 or MXO 2 series if they also plan to replace RTB2000 and RTM3000.
I can't talk roadmap, but we've been pretty open about this scope being "the first" of a new generation using this chipset.  So read from that what you will  ;D

-Rich
 

Offline Rich@RohdeScopesUSA

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 457
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #19 on: September 28, 2022, 06:30:28 pm »
If the waveform update rate is really high for all settings then this maybe the first scope that has both high resolution and fast waveform update rate (>1 MS/sec). My question would be how fast it can perform waveform average? Maximum is 16M averages, how long would that take?
Sadly, I don't even have one yet.  Maybe @pdenisowski can test that?  If not, I'll get an answer for you as soon as I get my hands on one.

-Rich
 
The following users thanked this post: maxwell3e10

Offline Rich@RohdeScopesUSA

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 457
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #20 on: September 28, 2022, 06:36:04 pm »
Nice to see manufacturers continuing to push the envelope of specifications in multiple directions (not just a one trick pony), including details like more offset range.

Do share pricing when you can.
The offset range is a great catch - it will be overlooked with all the speed discussion, but is critical in many applications.

Pricing for the US starts at $8,435 for a 200MHz, 4ch model (sorry - don't have other countries). 

-Rich

 

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26907
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #21 on: September 28, 2022, 06:39:09 pm »
Nice to see manufacturers continuing to push the envelope of specifications in multiple directions (not just a one trick pony), including details like more offset range.

Do share pricing when you can.
The offset range is a great catch - it will be overlooked with all the speed discussion, but is critical in many applications.
I agree with that. A limited offset range is something I run into regulary on various oscilloscopes.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #22 on: September 28, 2022, 06:55:59 pm »
Pricing for the US starts at $8,435 for a 200MHz, 4ch model (sorry - don't have other countries).

Batronix (Germany/EU) got them too:

https://www.batronix.com/shop/oscilloscopes/Rohde-Schwarz-MXO44-242.html

I must confess, this is really an eyecatcher - But far, far away for me... 8)

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16670
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #23 on: September 28, 2022, 07:38:44 pm »
As usual, it was a nice ride while it lasted. :)
Well, if you compare the 200MHz version its "only" a factor of 2 compared to a Siglent SDS2204X HD  ;)

Wait 'til you add a few "accessories" like serial decoders, the AWG, or heaven forbid ... a bandwidth upgrade.  >:D

Is the Siglent HD hackable? I'm betting the R&S isn't.
 

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #24 on: September 28, 2022, 07:46:12 pm »
Comparison is the end of happiness and the beginning of dissatisfaction

(Kierkegaard)

 8)
 
The following users thanked this post: BU508A, balnazzar

Offline tv84

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3221
  • Country: pt
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #25 on: September 28, 2022, 07:52:54 pm »
Early look and teardown by AddOhms for those interested:



Very cool review.
 

Offline tv84

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3221
  • Country: pt
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #26 on: September 28, 2022, 07:55:41 pm »
Is the Siglent HD hackable? I'm betting the R&S isn't.

The HD has been shown to be. You're missing classes.

Regarding the R&S, do you wanna bet one?  ;)
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, Martin72, luudee

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #27 on: September 28, 2022, 08:14:48 pm »
 ;D

Hmmm.....A challenge....This would be worth alone to buy it... ;)

Offline tomud

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 169
  • Country: pl
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #28 on: September 28, 2022, 08:15:27 pm »
As usual, it was a nice ride while it lasted. :)
Well, if you compare the 200MHz version its "only" a factor of 2 compared to a Siglent SDS2204X HD  ;)

Wait 'til you add a few "accessories" like serial decoders, the AWG, or heaven forbid ... a bandwidth upgrade.  >:D

Is the Siglent HD hackable? I'm betting the R&S isn't.

It doesn't really matter. Probably few hobbyists who hack oscilloscopes are able to spend 7600 euro + VAT on the oscilloscope. For me, the maximum expenditure is the SDS2000X HD level ... Although I was thinking about SDS6054A - if there was 12 bit at this price, maybe I would have the enthusiasm to collect that much  :phew:

The oscilloscope is really nice, maybe if R&S will give some special prices for hobbyists I will buy it  :P
« Last Edit: September 28, 2022, 08:22:48 pm by tomud »
For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple neat and wrong...
 

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #29 on: September 28, 2022, 08:24:50 pm »
Quote
For me, the maximum expenditure is the SDS2000X HD level .

Me too, I was sweating blood while making the moneytransfer...
On the other hand my audio equipment had cost more than double and my interests are actually changing more in the direction of having good measure equipment at home.
But 9000€....Actually impossible to think of.


Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16670
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #30 on: September 28, 2022, 08:26:16 pm »
Is the Siglent HD hackable? I'm betting the R&S isn't.
The HD has been shown to be. You're missing classes.

Sorry for not following every single Siglent thread...  ;D
 

Offline tomud

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 169
  • Country: pl
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #31 on: September 28, 2022, 08:36:01 pm »
Quote
For me, the maximum expenditure is the SDS2000X HD level .

Me too, I was sweating blood while making the moneytransfer...
On the other hand my audio equipment had cost more than double and my interests are actually changing more in the direction of having good measure equipment at home.
But 9000€....Actually impossible to think of.

I'm better;) + 23% VAT instead of 19% in Germany, with such large amounts it is a good sum to pay :-DD
What's funny, if I bought in Batronix for a company, I would pay 0% VAT - ehh, this is social justice and how to pay taxes honestly  :-//
For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple neat and wrong...
 

Offline 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6662
  • Country: hr
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #32 on: September 28, 2022, 08:37:58 pm »
So it drops down from millions of triggers per second to 1.3k WFMS/s when you enable statistics?

For instance, SDS6000H12 PRO can't achieve 4.5MWFMS/s. It will go up to 150K. But if you enable 6 measurements, with full statistics, measuring over full buffer, an histicons (histograms) for all measurements it will not slow down at ALL.

This only shows how different architectures have it's strengths at different places..

What I like is that they seem to have implemented spectrum analysis that is independent from time domain... That could be interesting if there is mixed mode triggering..

One thing I don't like is that they fully embraced practice to release products that are not feature complete... At this moment it has less protocol decodes than Rigol DS1000Z, Zone button is not implemented ... and god knows what else we cannot see from short video.
Yes I know they will do it, but if I buy a 25000€ scope I would like it to work today not in two years, no matter how I trust them to be good on a promise. It is a simple matter that in that case it is prudent to buy it when it actually can perform tasks needed. In two years..

But it seems to be a nice step forward for R&S...
 

Offline Domitronic

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 102
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #33 on: September 28, 2022, 09:05:28 pm »

One thing I don't like is that they fully embraced practice to release products that are not feature complete... At this moment it has less protocol decodes than Rigol DS1000Z, Zone button is not implemented ... and god knows what else we cannot see from short video.
Yes I know they will do it, but if I buy a 25000€ scope I would like it to work today not in two years, no matter how I trust them to be good on a promise. It is a simple matter that in that case it is prudent to buy it when it actually can perform tasks needed. In two years..


That is really a problem today. Tektronix does the same with their new 2 Series. The only way out is to make your decision on what it is at the time you buy and not what might be in the future. Just don't assume anything will be fixed or added later on. And much less expect that anything will be free of charge. If even simple serial decoders come with additional cost, i would assume zone trigger will not be added free of charge but as an option later on.

 

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #34 on: September 28, 2022, 09:24:30 pm »
Quote
Tektronix does the same with their new 2 Series

Everyone does it, siglent, rigol also.
You buy a fully loaded scope in every case.
Even when you buy the basic model, every costs are into the price for it plus bonus.
And when you relase an option like freeing a prisioner, it will make more plus.
Therefore they can make "promo-offers" like all options including, without weeping in their cushions.
And therefore I don´t have any problems to free prisioners without paying ransom money.

Offline Rich@RohdeScopesUSA

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 457
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #35 on: September 28, 2022, 09:32:02 pm »
...i would assume zone trigger will not be added free of charge but as an option later on.
Zone will be a free upgrade.  And it's really good  8)

-Rich
 

Offline Rich@RohdeScopesUSA

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 457
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #36 on: September 28, 2022, 09:36:09 pm »
So it drops down from millions of triggers per second to 1.3k WFMS/s when you enable statistics?

For instance, SDS6000H12 PRO can't achieve 4.5MWFMS/s. It will go up to 150K. But if you enable 6 measurements, with full statistics, measuring over full buffer, an histicons (histograms) for all measurements it will not slow down at ALL.

This only shows how different architectures have it's strengths at different places..

What I like is that they seem to have implemented spectrum analysis that is independent from time domain... That could be interesting if there is mixed mode triggering..

One thing I don't like is that they fully embraced practice to release products that are not feature complete... At this moment it has less protocol decodes than Rigol DS1000Z, Zone button is not implemented ... and god knows what else we cannot see from short video.
Yes I know they will do it, but if I buy a 25000€ scope I would like it to work today not in two years, no matter how I trust them to be good on a promise. It is a simple matter that in that case it is prudent to buy it when it actually can perform tasks needed. In two years..

But it seems to be a nice step forward for R&S...
I hear what you're saying, but I guess I like that we have the ability to turn so many things on in hardware over time.  So even if it isn't done today in hardware (say measurement statistics) we can add that as needed/asked for.  And since this is a new platform, it will mature over time.  I think people will be impressed at what we can do with it and I sort of love when new firmware is released on something like my phone (or even cars with OTA updates) and new features and capabilities come about.  But I may be in the minority.

With respect to the frequency domain - it is fully independent, but is still correlated to the time domain.  You can do some really powerful things with it today (with more to come - free even ;D).

-Rich
 
The following users thanked this post: Someone, 2N3055

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16670
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #37 on: September 28, 2022, 09:40:26 pm »
What's funny, if I bought in Batronix for a company, I would pay 0% VAT - ehh, this is social justice and how to pay taxes honestly  :-//

It's not "cheaper" for a company, they'd reclaim the VAT anyway if they bought it in their own country.

European VAT rules are just there to avoid inter-country paperwork - you don't pay VAT on the purchase but you also don't get to reclaim it in your tax returns.
 

Offline Domitronic

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 102
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #38 on: September 28, 2022, 09:54:25 pm »
Quote
Tektronix does the same with their new 2 Series

Everyone does it, siglent, rigol also.
You buy a fully loaded scope in every case.
Even when you buy the basic model, every costs are into the price for it plus bonus.
And when you relase an option like freeing a prisioner, it will make more plus.
Therefore they can make "promo-offers" like all options including, without weeping in their cushions.
And therefore I don´t have any problems to free prisioners without paying ransom money.

Thats not what i meant. Selling options is fine for me of course. There is cost involved to develop software options and its clear for me that it costs money. For example if a bode plot function saves a lot of time at work because i don't have to sweep it manually this money is justified.

Tektronix released the 2 series without the MSO function implemented. Advertising features that are not there but might be in the future is the problem. At least R&S doesn't promise anything in particular and just advertise what is already there. What i wanted to say is make your decisions on what is already there and not what my be in the future. If you need a MSO with 16 digital channels, simply don't buy Tek 2 series today. If you need other decoders/options than MXO4 has today, don't buy it today.

 
The following users thanked this post: nctnico, thm_w

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26907
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #39 on: September 28, 2022, 09:55:34 pm »
So it drops down from millions of triggers per second to 1.3k WFMS/s when you enable statistics?

For instance, SDS6000H12 PRO can't achieve 4.5MWFMS/s. It will go up to 150K. But if you enable 6 measurements, with full statistics, measuring over full buffer, an histicons (histograms) for all measurements it will not slow down at ALL.

This only shows how different architectures have it's strengths at different places..

What I like is that they seem to have implemented spectrum analysis that is independent from time domain... That could be interesting if there is mixed mode triggering..

One thing I don't like is that they fully embraced practice to release products that are not feature complete... At this moment it has less protocol decodes than Rigol DS1000Z, Zone button is not implemented ... and god knows what else we cannot see from short video.
Yes I know they will do it, but if I buy a 25000€ scope I would like it to work today not in two years, no matter how I trust them to be good on a promise. It is a simple matter that in that case it is prudent to buy it when it actually can perform tasks needed. In two years..

But it seems to be a nice step forward for R&S...
I hear what you're saying, but I guess I like that we have the ability to turn so many things on in hardware over time.  So even if it isn't done today in hardware (say measurement statistics) we can add that as needed/asked for.  And since this is a new platform, it will mature over time.  I think people will be impressed at what we can do with it and I sort of love when new firmware is released on something like my phone (or even cars with OTA updates) and new features and capabilities come about.  But I may be in the minority.
IMHO the most important thing is that what functionality is offered today, is working as expected / reliable. Whether the current feature set matches your current buying requirements is another matter. From a business perspective I think it is not wise to buy test equipment that misses features you need today. I also think that adding features in the future won't affect any buying decission other than having more features makes an instrument more likely to fit certain requirements at some point in time.

I do get though that you need to release a product to the market at some point; a good moment is when the basic functionality is working up to a level where the product is interesting enough to buy. If you leave it up to engineers, a product is never finished  ;D
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #40 on: September 28, 2022, 10:57:02 pm »
This can be seen twice.. ;)

The rest I can sign, we bought "raw" siglent sds2k+ scopes without any additional options - Because we don´t need them.

Offline Someone

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4531
  • Country: au
    • send complaints here
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #41 on: September 28, 2022, 11:03:58 pm »
If the waveform update rate is really high for all settings then this maybe the first scope that has both high resolution and fast waveform update rate (>1 MS/sec).
And don't forget deep memory... Keysight is having a very bad day today.
as if the EXR models never existed! Much more comparable on the memory axis, ups and downs on other characteristics.

Compared to the competition, R&S are pushing products with broader capabilities covering more ground in a single instrument. Easy to pick one dimension against almost any other specific scope where it excels, since the multidimensional polar diagram (that some manufacturers love for their comparisons) is so large in area, but with only incremental improvement over the best one-trick pony in any one dimension.
 

Offline TheDefpom

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 707
  • Country: nz
  • YouTuber Nerd - I Fix Stuff
    • The Defpom's Channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #42 on: September 28, 2022, 11:18:05 pm »
Early look and teardown by AddOhms for those interested:



We're working to get Dave and Shahriar permanent units as well - we're still starting to get them shipped out.  Hope they'll have them shortly (@Dave - Tristen will be in touch if he hasn't already been).

-Rich

I’m a test gear reviewer too you know… I could use one to look at as well.
Cheers Scott

Check out my Electronics Repair, Mailbag, or Review Videos at https://www.youtube.com/TheDefpom
 
The following users thanked this post: Rich@RohdeScopesUSA

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26907
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #43 on: September 28, 2022, 11:32:38 pm »
If the waveform update rate is really high for all settings then this maybe the first scope that has both high resolution and fast waveform update rate (>1 MS/sec).
And don't forget deep memory... Keysight is having a very bad day today.
as if the EXR models never existed! Much more comparable on the memory axis, ups and downs on other characteristics.
Keysight EXR is in a different price bracket and it is PC based as well.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Offline Someone

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4531
  • Country: au
    • send complaints here
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #44 on: September 28, 2022, 11:55:15 pm »
If the waveform update rate is really high for all settings then this maybe the first scope that has both high resolution and fast waveform update rate (>1 MS/sec).
And don't forget deep memory... Keysight is having a very bad day today.
as if the EXR models never existed! Much more comparable on the memory axis, ups and downs on other characteristics.
Keysight EXR is in a different price bracket and it is PC based as well.
Really? want to continue with your misleading statements? EXR's are priced around the same as MSOX4000's (used as a "direct" comparison).

MXO vs MSOX4000 vs EXR USD pricing
4ch 500MHz, 17,205 vs 22,370 vs 22,579
4ch 1GHz, 21,310 vs 26,883 vs 28,255

30% more, retail, comparing a just released (and competitive) model. By your argument the MSOX4000 isn't a target for comparison. Unsurprisingly, new released product does more for somewhat less $$. That's not a different price bracket, or a different performance/tier, or a different target market. They have quite the overlap. As I said in the full quote:
Compared to the competition, R&S are pushing products with broader capabilities covering more ground in a single instrument. Easy to pick one dimension against almost any other specific scope where it excels, since the multidimensional polar diagram (that some manufacturers love for their comparisons) is so large in area, but with only incremental improvement over the best one-trick pony in any one dimension.
There isn't a single direct competitor you can pick out, most brands have 2+ different model lines overlapping this space. R&S are doing good things with well rounded designs, better value for small companies that don't have a fleet of different tools to pick from.
 

Offline maxwell3e10

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 869
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #45 on: September 29, 2022, 04:59:00 am »
Keysight's EXR or other "mid-range" models don't go any faster than 200k waveforms/sec. Here is a handy summary.

But: MXO4 slowing down to 1300 waveforms/sec when statistics is enabled is a major problem! What happens when the averaging is turned on?   I can see that the most common use for fast waveform update  is to catch rare events.  But another major use is to quickly accumulate data, such as average and standard deviation.
 

Offline tomud

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 169
  • Country: pl
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #46 on: September 29, 2022, 05:19:57 am »
What's funny, if I bought in Batronix for a company, I would pay 0% VAT - ehh, this is social justice and how to pay taxes honestly  :-//

It's not "cheaper" for a company, they'd reclaim the VAT anyway if they bought it in their own country.

European VAT rules are just there to avoid inter-country paperwork - you don't pay VAT on the purchase but you also don't get to reclaim it in your tax returns.

I know how it works because I also have a company ... Except that so far I have not bought hobby equipment on invoice (although I can - you can see honesty does not pay off too much). However, there is also a subtle difference. Do not pay VAT and pay and wait X time for the return ;) I am ignoring the fact that stupid EU VAT regulations (including the zero rate) are the best for thieves who defraud VAT refunds. Another bullshit recipe that I have to pay more VAT online (when buying for hobby use), it is more profitable for me to go to Germany (producing some CO2, NOx... :-DD) and buy an oscilloscope with a lower VAT rate... ...but this is not a topic for this forum.
« Last Edit: September 29, 2022, 05:46:04 am by tomud »
For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple neat and wrong...
 

Offline goaty

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 205
  • Country: de
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #47 on: September 29, 2022, 08:35:42 am »
I got the RTB2004-COM4 promo, so why not wait for the MXO4-COM4 package....
 

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16670
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #48 on: September 29, 2022, 09:59:53 am »
I know how it works because I also have a company ... Except that so far I have not bought hobby equipment on invoice (although I can - you can see honesty does not pay off too much).

In theory I could get the RTB2004EDU with a ton of options for 1790 Euros.

https://www.batronix.com/shop/oscilloscopes/Rohde-Schwarz-RTB2004EDU.html

All the bits bought separately as an ordinary citizen would be over 6000 Euros.

I hate the shiny screen though, so...  :-//


Edit: A day later and the price is now 2233 Euros! I should have snapped one up...  :palm:
« Last Edit: September 30, 2022, 01:23:05 pm by Fungus »
 

Offline 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6662
  • Country: hr
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #49 on: September 29, 2022, 10:09:23 am »
I know how it works because I also have a company ... Except that so far I have not bought hobby equipment on invoice (although I can - you can see honesty does not pay off too much).

In theory I could get the RTB2004EDU with a ton of options for 1790 Euros.

https://www.batronix.com/shop/oscilloscopes/Rohde-Schwarz-RTB2004EDU.html

All the bits bought separately as an ordinary citizen would be over 6000 Euros.

I hate the shiny screen though, so...  :-//

Don't forget it's only 70MHz..
 

Offline Domitronic

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 102
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #50 on: September 29, 2022, 10:42:56 am »
I got the RTB2004-COM4 promo, so why not wait for the MXO4-COM4 package....

Well, looking at my budget i would need to wait for a MXO2-COM4 package  :D
 

Offline Messtechniker

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 782
  • Country: de
  • Old analog audio hand - No voodoo.
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #51 on: September 29, 2022, 02:00:23 pm »
Just downloaded the 574 page manual.  :scared:
Will keep me out of trouble over the next few days. :popcorn:
Agilent 34465A, Siglent SDG 2042X, Hameg HMO1022, R&S HMC 8043, Peaktech 2025A, Voltcraft VC 940, M-Audio Audiophile 192, R&S Psophometer UPGR, 3 Transistor Testers, DL4JAL Transistor Curve Tracer, UT622E LCR meter
 
The following users thanked this post: Rich@RohdeScopesUSA, salvagedcircuitry, Durong

Offline jjoonathan

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 783
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #52 on: September 29, 2022, 02:22:44 pm »
I am still trying to figure out the FFT architecture. From this video:


https://youtu.be/acE3d4TpiW4?t=46


it looks like changing the FFT settings also changes the time domain acquisition settings. Reducing the RBW 500Hz -> 400Hz -> 300Hz also reduces the sample rate from 1000 -> 833 -> 417 MS/s, which is what I would expect if the FFT were dependent on acquisition data (lower RBW => longer FFT window => longer acquisition) but not what I would expect from an independent FFT pathway.


The ability to have an independent FFT acquisition path would be very helpful for applications that require low-bandwidth-high-res time domain and low-bandwidth-high-frequency RF, e.g. looking at a power rail, spi bus, or VCO control at the same time as a corresponding 900MHz RF burst. On my bench, this is a very common situation. If the FFT must be calculated off acquisition data, the high fundamental frequency of the RF burst demands a high sample rate even though "morally" it has a lower information requirement driven by RBW+span. If the FFT and time domain have separate acquisition paths, these requirements are not in conflict, because the FPGA can send an efficient low-bandwidth-high-res time-domain trace alongside a low-bandwidth-high-frequency spectrogram, rather than a big high-bandwidth block of full-rate samples suitable for calculating both of them.


I want to believe that the MXO resolves this conflict with independent measurement pathways, but the video makes it look like the MXO has independent FFT in the more limited sense as the older R&S scopes, where you can trade off RBW against the number of stacked/overlapped FFTs, but you cannot have low-bandwidth-high-res time domain at the same time as low-bandwidth-high-frequency spectra unless you fill your acquisition memory with high-bandwidth samples. Could you clarify which definition of "independent" is in play here? Thanks. (EDIT: I made & pulled this same post yesterday, not wanting to cause out-of-hours work, but I was too slow and got an answer by PM anyway. Apologies.)
« Last Edit: September 29, 2022, 02:32:12 pm by jjoonathan »
 

Offline Rich@RohdeScopesUSA

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 457
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #53 on: September 29, 2022, 02:32:20 pm »
I am still trying to figure out the FFT architecture. From this video:


https://youtu.be/acE3d4TpiW4?t=46


it looks like changing the FFT settings also changes the time domain acquisition settings. Reducing the RBW 500Hz -> 400Hz -> 300Hz also reduces the sample rate from 1000 -> 833 -> 417 MS/s, which is what I would expect if the FFT were dependent on acquisition data (lower RBW => longer FFT window => longer acquisition) but not what I would expect from an independent FFT pathway.


The ability to have an independent FFT acquisition path would be very helpful for applications that require a low time-domain sample rate but a high RF sample rate, e.g. looking at a low frequency power rail, spi bus, or VCO control at the same time as a corresponding 900MHz RF burst. On my bench, this is a very common situation. If the FFT must be calculated off acquisition data, the high fundamental frequency of the RF burst demands a high sample rate even though "morally" it has a lower information requirement driven by RBW+span. If the FFT and time domain have separate acquisition paths, these requirements are not in conflict, because the FPGA can send an efficient lowpassed time-domain trace alongside an efficient spectrogram, rather than a big inefficient block of full-rate samples suitable for calculating both of them. To the user, memory efficiency is visible as the maximum acquisition time when RF+DC pathways are active. If they are dependent, max acquisition time is milliseconds, but if they are independent, it can be many seconds.


I want to believe that the MXO resolves this conflict with independent measurement pathways, but the video makes it look like the MXO has independent FFT in the more limited sense as the older R&S scopes, where you can trade off RBW against the number of stacked/overlapped FFTs, but you cannot have low-sample-rate time domain signals at the same time as high-sample-rate FFTs. Could you clarify which definition of "independent" is in play here? Thanks. (EDIT: I made & pulled this same post yesterday, not wanting to cause out-of-hours work, but I was too slow and got an answer by PM anyway. Apologies.)
Good question - and I appreciate you not wanting to cause out-of-hours work  :)  I PM'd our planner to get an answer - here's what they replied:

Historically, oscilloscope FFTs have had dependencies between frequency domain settings (CF, span, RBW) and time domain settings (RL, timebase).  If you changed the RL or timebase in the time domain this would cause a change to the FFT RBW and the converse was also true.  For the MXO 4 we removed these dependencies.  So you can set the timebase as you want and set CF/Span and RBW independently.  With that said, you are correct that adequate sample rate is still a requirement for bandwidth in either the time domain or frequency domain.  Nyquist still rules.  For MXO 4 the sample rate determines a common maximum bandwidth value for both time and frequency domain.

-Rich
 
The following users thanked this post: thm_w, tooki, jjoonathan

Offline jjoonathan

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 783
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #54 on: September 29, 2022, 02:57:17 pm »
Ok, so it sounds like the FFT settings are independent but constraints still propagate to acquisition settings (low RBW -> long acquisition, high frequency -> high sample rate). That's still a very useful capability -- I certainly appreciate it on my RTO -- but it still leaves the tradeoff where if I simultaneously want two low-bandwidth things (say, 1MHz of DC and a 1MHz sliver of RF) I still have to fill my acquisition memory with full-bandwidth samples (2.5GS/s rather than, say, 1*5MS/s + 1*5MS/s).

Even so, the new capabilities are beautiful and I look forward to the day when the platform refresh works up to MXO6 tier  :)
 
The following users thanked this post: Rich@RohdeScopesUSA, pdenisowski

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #55 on: September 30, 2022, 12:50:42 pm »
The 18 short (~1 minute) videos showing different features of the MXO4 are now live on the Rohde and Schwarz YouTube channel

https://www.youtube.com/user/RohdeundSchwarz/videos
Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, jjoonathan

Offline Messtechniker

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 782
  • Country: de
  • Old analog audio hand - No voodoo.
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #56 on: September 30, 2022, 01:54:24 pm »
Pity that the input BNCs on the MXO4 are not colour coded like on my R&S HMO1022.
Here LEDs next to the BNCs are used to colour code the active channels. Very useful IMO.

Moreover, on the MXO4 the channels are abbreviated as C1 ... C4
instead of the more usual CH1...CH4.

For us audio types it would be nice to know - just as a matter of interest - the true
distortion level of both generator and scope at 1 kHz.

The specs say: <0.1 % (-60dB) below 10 MHz. I expect the MXO4 to be much
better than that at 1 kHz.

Also a pity, that I do not have a use case for the MXO44 or even a MXO42 (+ generator option)
should a two channel version ever become available. Even a two channel MSOX4 with generator
option will probably be well over 5k Euros. Oh well. :scared:

My HMO1022 can do everything I need and also much more. :-+

Toddles off to read more about this beast  :)
Agilent 34465A, Siglent SDG 2042X, Hameg HMO1022, R&S HMC 8043, Peaktech 2025A, Voltcraft VC 940, M-Audio Audiophile 192, R&S Psophometer UPGR, 3 Transistor Testers, DL4JAL Transistor Curve Tracer, UT622E LCR meter
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki

Offline egonotto

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 723
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #57 on: October 01, 2022, 01:43:50 am »
The 18 short (~1 minute) videos showing different features of the MXO4 are now live on the Rohde and Schwarz YouTube channel

https://www.youtube.com/user/RohdeundSchwarz/videos

Hello pdenisowski,

in the thread:
"https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/rigol-hdo1000-and-hdo4000-12bit-oscilloscopes-launched-in-china/" we want to analyze and compare the noise behavior of different 12 bit scopes in more detail.
It would be interesting if we also got data of the new impressive MXO 4.
Eight traces would be useful for this:

Maybe you should not use the first channel, because with my RTA4000 the display there also disturbs something.

All 8 measurements with 400 Mpoints (or 800 Mpoints) memory and 5 GSa/s sampling rate and open inputs:

1 mV/div 50 Ohm maximum bandwidth (200 MHz)
1 mV/div 50 Ohm 20 MHz bandwidth
1 mV/div 1 MOhm maximum bandwidth (200 MHz)
1 mV/div 1 MOhm 20 MHz bandwidth

1 V/div 50 Ohm maximum bandwidth (200 MHz)
1 V/div 50 Ohm 20 MHz bandwidth
1 V/div 1 MOhm maximum bandwidth (200 MHz)
1 V/div 1 MOhm 20 MHz bandwidth

Thanks in advance.

Best regards
egonotto

PS: In datasheet page 7
"Memory depth
 standard                       400 Mpoints with 4 active channel (single),
                                     400 Mpoints with 2 active channel (run)
R&S®MXO4-B108 option
                                     800 Mpoints with 2 active channel (single),
                                     800 Mpoints with 1 active channel (run)
"

Is this correct? I would guess that the memory is larger with 2 channels than with 4 channels with (single).

Is there is more detailed information on "The maximum available memory depth depends on the bit depth of the acquired data and, therefore, on the settings of the acquisition system, such as
decimation mode, waveform arithmetic or high definition mode"

« Last Edit: October 01, 2022, 02:54:32 am by egonotto »
 
The following users thanked this post: BU508A

Offline jjoonathan

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 783
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #58 on: October 01, 2022, 01:41:26 pm »
Not a 12 bit scope, but I took the same measurements on my 8 bit RTO with 20MHz and 200MHz HD filters:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/e00tn9mtlpsd6gx/AABKMUdwkqgnRjF2VQDP6k_Oa?dl=0

(all traces are 10GS/s with filters to reduce bandwidth and improve vertical resolution)

Back-of-the-envelope says it starts at ENOB 7, the filters chop noise bandwidth by 20x, so ideally another ~2 bits and ENOB around 9, which is where most 12 bit scopes seem to land anyway. I'd love to see the apples-to-apples comparison of what it actually achieves, though -- I suspect the ENOB figures on the 12 bit scopes might be suffering from some kind of worst case and that the 3 least significant bits aren't typically complete rubbish.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2022, 01:46:52 pm by jjoonathan »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline balnazzar

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 417
  • Country: it
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #59 on: October 13, 2022, 11:13:13 am »
I hate the shiny screen though, so...  :-//

Buy a tablet matte screen protector. Then cut it.

They are made with different levels of "matteness".

 

Offline RBBVNL9

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 326
  • Country: nl
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #60 on: October 17, 2022, 03:24:45 pm »

Quote
Buy a tablet matte screen protector. Then cut it.

Over time, there are more and more instruments in my lab that have shiny screens, small or large. From a company called ViaScreens I bought their "Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 Matte Screen Protector". Not that I have that Wacom device, but it's among the largest protectors they have, and I think they even send you two if you order it. Works well with digitizer screens (after all, that's what the Wacom is about).

More than enough to cut out parts for all the shiny devices I have here ;-)
 
The following users thanked this post: pdenisowski

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16670
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #61 on: October 17, 2022, 10:59:08 pm »
You can probably get any size screen protector on Aliexpress.

I cut up phone screen protectors for all my multimeters, etc.
 

Offline Neurosurg

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 37
  • Country: pl
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #62 on: October 18, 2022, 03:36:24 pm »
Not a 12 bit scope, but I took the same measurements on my 8 bit RTO with 20MHz and 200MHz HD filters:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/e00tn9mtlpsd6gx/AABKMUdwkqgnRjF2VQDP6k_Oa?dl=0

(all traces are 10GS/s with filters to reduce bandwidth and improve vertical resolution)

Back-of-the-envelope says it starts at ENOB 7, the filters chop noise bandwidth by 20x, so ideally another ~2 bits and ENOB around 9, which is where most 12 bit scopes seem to land anyway. I'd love to see the apples-to-apples comparison of what it actually achieves, though -- I suspect the ENOB figures on the 12 bit scopes might be suffering from some kind of worst case and that the 3 least significant bits aren't typically complete rubbish.

Jjonathan could you post a picture of yours R&S RTO1044 in HQ. In my opinon the RTE, RTO scopes looks much more professjonal and well doned :)
 

Offline jjoonathan

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 783
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #63 on: October 21, 2022, 07:36:01 pm »
Not a 12 bit scope, but I took the same measurements on my 8 bit RTO with 20MHz and 200MHz HD filters:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/e00tn9mtlpsd6gx/AABKMUdwkqgnRjF2VQDP6k_Oa?dl=0

(all traces are 10GS/s with filters to reduce bandwidth and improve vertical resolution)

Back-of-the-envelope says it starts at ENOB 7, the filters chop noise bandwidth by 20x, so ideally another ~2 bits and ENOB around 9, which is where most 12 bit scopes seem to land anyway. I'd love to see the apples-to-apples comparison of what it actually achieves, though -- I suspect the ENOB figures on the 12 bit scopes might be suffering from some kind of worst case and that the 3 least significant bits aren't typically complete rubbish.

Jjonathan could you post a picture of yours R&S RTO1044 in HQ. In my opinon the RTE, RTO scopes looks much more professjonal and well doned :)
Here, I have performed a rigorous evaluation of the professional aspects of the scope, just for you  ;D
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, tv84, Martin72

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #64 on: October 21, 2022, 09:25:10 pm »
Now I know for what it´s good for.. 8)
 
The following users thanked this post: jjoonathan

Offline jjoonathan

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 783
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #65 on: October 21, 2022, 10:18:16 pm »
Ssh, don't tell marketing, or next time we will need to buy an option RTO-K666 to play doom  >:D
 
The following users thanked this post: tv84, pdenisowski, Martin72

Offline egonotto

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 723
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #66 on: October 21, 2022, 11:14:43 pm »
Hello,

what version of Doom is this? It looks like Doom 4.

Best regards
egonotto
 

Offline jjoonathan

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 783
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #67 on: October 21, 2022, 11:44:20 pm »
Doom Eternal, the one from 2020 with good gameplay. Highly recommended.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, balnazzar

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #68 on: October 22, 2022, 10:26:41 pm »
Looking on the batronix site, the prices for the options are heavy ones.
Not under 3K/each (appx and incl. 19%VAT), bode plot, decodings, more memory and so on...
But one thing is interesting, you can upgrade the bandwith from 200Mhz up to the topmodel 1.5Ghz, so it´s always the same hardware.
Nice thing for hackers.. ;)
And interesting the second, buying the upgrade from 200Mhz to 1.5Ghz is NOT more expensive than buying directly the 1.5Ghz model.

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16670
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #69 on: October 23, 2022, 03:29:55 am »
But one thing is interesting, you can upgrade the bandwith from 200Mhz up to the topmodel 1.5Ghz, so it´s always the same hardware.
Nice thing for hackers.. ;)

You probably need to go inside and solder JTAG wires to the PCB though, and working hacks are thin on the ground.

https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/why-bandwidth-hacks-difficult-at-rs-devices/

And interesting the second, buying the upgrade from 200Mhz to 1.5Ghz is NOT more expensive than buying directly the 1.5Ghz model.

Are you sure the 1.5Ghz model doesn't have other stuff included as standard?
 

Offline goaty

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 205
  • Country: de
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #70 on: November 16, 2022, 07:20:57 am »
Are there any review videos coming up on the MXO4 ? Seems to me to be too quiet around that device - even if I cannot afford it, it would be interesting.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, maxwell3e10

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #71 on: November 17, 2022, 12:32:13 am »
Same here, around 10k makes it nearly (but not completely) impossible to buy in private.
But I would love to see "more" from it, it´s a very sexy scope from the first view.. ;)
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline luudee

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 274
  • Country: th
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #72 on: November 17, 2022, 02:58:40 am »
Same here, around 10k makes it nearly (but not completely) impossible to buy in private.
But I would love to see "more" from it, it´s a very sexy scope from the first view.. ;)

Me too. If could get a fully loaded, top of the line  MXO4 for around $10K I would go for it immediately.

But it looks like a fully configured MXO4 right now would cost me $30K. That's a bit harsh.



Maybe R&S could do an introductory Christmas price ?!     R&S hint, hint ...     :popcorn:



luudee
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #73 on: November 17, 2022, 04:38:55 am »
Are there any review videos coming up on the MXO4 ? Seems to me to be too quiet around that device - even if I cannot afford it, it would be interesting.

I've been busy with other videos and scopes, and there was this  :-DD
It's being swapped tomorrow.

https://odysee.com/@eevblog:7/MXO4-Screw-Loose:2
 

Offline goaty

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 205
  • Country: de
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #74 on: November 17, 2022, 06:40:17 am »
I've been busy with other videos and scopes, and there was this  :-DD
It's being swapped tomorrow.

https://odysee.com/@eevblog:7/MXO4-Screw-Loose:2

Ah come on, really ? Would have made the "take it apaaaat" one screw faster.
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #75 on: November 17, 2022, 07:41:18 am »
I've been busy with other videos and scopes, and there was this  :-DD
It's being swapped tomorrow.
https://odysee.com/@eevblog:7/MXO4-Screw-Loose:2
Ah come on, really ? Would have made the "take it apaaaat" one screw faster.

I was actually on a live stream with them going over some of the advanced features when I discovered it. I promised I wouldn't take it apart so they could investigate.
 
The following users thanked this post: Kean, tooki, pdenisowski, luudee

Offline maxwell3e10

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 869
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #76 on: January 11, 2023, 05:20:19 pm »
Is there any update on MXO4? A noise spectrum and characterization of waveform update rate under different conditions would be nice!
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #77 on: January 15, 2023, 11:52:22 am »
Is there any update on MXO4? A noise spectrum and characterization of waveform update rate under different conditions would be nice!

Plan is to work on it this week. I just got back from a few weeks walkabout.
But I also have other videos I want to get finished, mailbag shelf is full, all the usual excuses...
 
The following users thanked this post: pdenisowski, VanBudd, luudee, Detlev

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #78 on: February 07, 2023, 02:49:24 am »
Finishing shooting the MXO4 unboxing video and tried to test the 4.5Mwfms/sec update, and, well, I don't see it  :-//

 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, Martin72, luudee

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #79 on: February 07, 2023, 06:15:13 am »
Finishing shooting the MXO4 unboxing video and tried to test the 4.5Mwfms/sec update, and, well, I don't see it  :-//



I had the measurements turned on. They said they are going to improve this in future firmware. So much for the ASIC.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, Martin72, luudee

Offline goaty

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 205
  • Country: de
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #80 on: February 08, 2023, 08:23:36 am »
Settings are the same or comparable ? Like trigger level ?
Update rate on the RTB2k also varies a lot and does rarely reach 50k/s.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6662
  • Country: hr
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #81 on: February 08, 2023, 11:57:37 am »
Finishing shooting the MXO4 unboxing video and tried to test the 4.5Mwfms/sec update, and, well, I don't see it  :-//



I had the measurements turned on. They said they are going to improve this in future firmware. So much for the ASIC.

That is analytic scope. It is not used that way...
And 4.5 Mtriggers in segmented mode is very good and very useful.

Set scope to long capture and set search for pulse width less than normal clock width. You will have 100% POI.
Or use pulse width trigger, with segmented mode, and assemble statistics of how glitch happens... Also 100% POI..

 
The following users thanked this post: rf-loop, nctnico, pdenisowski, luudee

Offline goaty

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 205
  • Country: de
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #82 on: February 08, 2023, 01:08:49 pm »
I wonder why there is this huge "blind time" of more then a millisecond.
That must be some parameters.
Of course one can use fast segmentation mode, but why it needs so much time between triggers ?
 
The following users thanked this post: luudee

Offline armandine2

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 602
  • Country: gb
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #83 on: February 08, 2023, 02:03:18 pm »


analytic scope versus a display scope?
Funny, the things you have the hardest time parting with are the things you need the least - Bob Dylan
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki, luudee

Offline bozidarms

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • Country: at
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #84 on: February 08, 2023, 02:13:30 pm »
Quote
That is analytic scope.

"Analytic scope" without at least Trends, Tracks and Histograms???

I don't really believe that...
 
The following users thanked this post: luudee

Offline 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6662
  • Country: hr
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #85 on: February 08, 2023, 02:40:15 pm »
Quote
That is analytic scope.

"Analytic scope" without at least Trends, Tracks and Histograms???

I don't really believe that...

Are you serious ?
Honestly I didn't even check so far...  I EXPECTED it to have at least that...
1000€ scopes have that nowadays...
Thank you for this nugget of information...  :-+

That is absolutely epic fail...
What is the price for then... ?
 
The following users thanked this post: luudee

Offline bozidarms

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • Country: at
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #86 on: February 08, 2023, 02:56:20 pm »
Not even simply Histicons ?!?

Prices from Batronix:

R&S® MXO44-2410       4x 1 GHz                                 € 22.848,- inkl. 19% MwSt.

R&S® MXO4-B1 MSO Option                                          € 3.332,-
R&S® MXO4-B6 Funktionsgenerator                               € 1.666,-
R&S® MXO4-B108 Speichererweiterung 800 Mpts            € 3.094,-
R&S® MXO4-K510 I2C, SPI, RS232, UART Dekoder          € 2.856,-
R&S® MXO4-K520 CAN, CAN-FD, CAN-XL Dekoder           € 2.856,-
R&S® MXO4-K36 Bode Plot                                            € 2.380,-
                                                                                -------------------------
                                                                                  € 39.032,-  :-DD
« Last Edit: February 08, 2023, 08:31:22 pm by bozidarms »
 
The following users thanked this post: EEVblog, 2N3055, luudee

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #87 on: February 08, 2023, 10:03:05 pm »
Finishing shooting the MXO4 unboxing video and tried to test the 4.5Mwfms/sec update, and, well, I don't see it  :-//



I had the measurements turned on. They said they are going to improve this in future firmware. So much for the ASIC.

That is analytic scope. It is not used that way...
And 4.5 Mtriggers in segmented mode is very good and very useful.

Set scope to long capture and set search for pulse width less than normal clock width. You will have 100% POI.
Or use pulse width trigger, with segmented mode, and assemble statistics of how glitch happens... Also 100% POI..

No, it has nothing to do with segmented mode at all.
It is literally an architecture bug/limitation where if you turn on the horizontal measurements (like frequency) the update rate drops from 1M/wfs/s to 1K/wfs/s.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26907
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #88 on: February 08, 2023, 10:17:05 pm »
Seems reasonable to me as the data needs to be processed for the measurement. Ofcourse there is a choice between using only the Nth acquisition to base calculations on OR doing calculations on all acquisitions. In the first option there is a disconnect between what is shown on screen and what is being calculated.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #89 on: February 08, 2023, 10:19:07 pm »
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #90 on: February 08, 2023, 10:20:49 pm »
Seems reasonable to me as the data needs to be processed for the measurement. Ofcourse there is a choice between using only the Nth acquisition to base calculations on OR doing calculations on all acquisitions. In the first option there is a disconnect between what is shown on screen and what is being calculated.

Not when you realise that the veritcal measurements and cursors have absolutely no impact at all on the waveform speed. It's only very specific horizontal measurements like Frequency which drops the update rate three orders of magnitude.
 

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26907
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #91 on: February 08, 2023, 11:03:29 pm »

If you use an R&S scope for a while, you'll see that using the 'Nsingle' setting for doing a segmented recording is a very efficient way to setup a segmented recording sequence. But I agree it isn't very standard and takes some getting used to. I just used it myself a couple of days ago (on the RTM3004).
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16670
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #92 on: February 09, 2023, 04:24:33 am »
If only there were things called manuals where you could go and type the word "single" and have the answer in a few seconds:



https://scdn.rohde-schwarz.com/ur/pws/dl_downloads/pdm/cl_manuals/user_manual/1335_5337_01/MXO4_UserManual_en_03.pdf

( :box: )
« Last Edit: February 09, 2023, 05:02:20 am by Fungus »
 
The following users thanked this post: goaty, luudee

Offline BU508A

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4527
  • Country: de
  • Per aspera ad astra
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #93 on: February 09, 2023, 08:08:09 am »
Marco Reps is measuring the noise of some ADR1000 with a MXO4:

https://youtu.be/mmsBT3Fuggk?t=3030

He uploaded the video two days ago.
“Chaos is found in greatest abundance wherever order is being sought. It always defeats order, because it is better organized.”            - Terry Pratchett -
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, pdenisowski

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #94 on: February 09, 2023, 08:16:02 am »
If only there were things called manuals where you could go and type the word "single" and have the answer in a few seconds:

Except when the manual is wrong. You have to go into the Segmented menu to find the option to change it.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, edavid

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #95 on: February 09, 2023, 08:19:38 am »
Marco Reps is measuring the noise of some ADR1000 with a MXO4:
https://youtu.be/mmsBT3Fuggk?t=3030
He uploaded the video two days ago.

Cool. The Rigol is (slightly) lower noise than the MXO4 though. No surprise given the MXO4 has a 1.5GHz front end. Even if you bandwidth limit, the inherent design noise is higher.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #96 on: February 09, 2023, 08:20:37 am »
If you use an R&S scope for a while, you'll see that using the 'Nsingle' setting for doing a segmented recording is a very efficient way to setup a segmented recording sequence.

Agreed. Segmented mode on most scopes is rather fiddly and annoying in comparison.
 
The following users thanked this post: pdenisowski

Offline bozidarms

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • Country: at
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #97 on: February 09, 2023, 11:14:12 am »
Noise values ​​for one "Industry-leading system architecture: 18-bit vertical resolution/12-bit ADC" are not so exceptional low as R&S would like them to be.

For MXO4 is stated - RMS noise floor ( HD mode ??? active for bandwidth ≤ 500 MHz)

sensitivity:

HDO4: analog bandwidth   1 GHz               LeCroy HDO  1 GHz

0.5 mV/    98 µV                                                       
1 mV/       104 µV                                                         145 μVrms
2 mV/       116 µV                                                         145 μVrms
5 mV/       152 µV                                                         150 μVrms
10 mV/      238 µV                                                        155 μVrms
20 mV/      436 µV                                                        185 μVrms
50 mV/      1.01 mV                                                      275 μVrms
100 mV/    2.47 mV                                                      500 μVrms
200 mV/    4.43 mV                                                      1.75 mVrms
500 mV/    10.13 mV                                                    2.75 mVrms
1 V/div      19.96 mV                                                    4.90 mVrms

For example, every LeCroy HD Oscilloscope has in sensitivity over 2mV  significantly better values, partly 4x better!

That is not bashing, only pure facts.
BUT, real bashing can one find on R&S official pages:

https://scdn.rohde-schwarz.com/ur/pws/dl_downloads/dl_common_library/dl_brochures_and_datasheets/pdf_1/Comp_sheet_-_MXO4_vs_Lecroy_WaveSurfer_4000HD.pdf

https://scdn.rohde-schwarz.com/ur/pws/dl_downloads/dl_common_library/dl_brochures_and_datasheets/pdf_1/Comp_sheet_-_MXO4_vs_Tektronix_4_Series_MSO_v1.00.pdf

https://scdn.rohde-schwarz.com/ur/pws/dl_downloads/dl_common_library/dl_brochures_and_datasheets/pdf_1/Comp_sheet_-_MXO4_vs_Keysight_4000_X_v1.00.pdf

If you read something like that, you will be speechless - it's amazing that a company with such a reputation uses such lousy and dirty tricks. - just sad.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2023, 11:42:02 am by bozidarms »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, luudee

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #98 on: February 09, 2023, 11:28:04 am »
If you read something like that, you will be speechless - it's amazing that a company with such a reputation uses such lousy and dirty tricks. - just sad.

Every manufacturer does those comparisons. Lie by omission is the marketing modus operandi.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16670
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #99 on: February 09, 2023, 11:33:28 am »
If only there were things called manuals where you could go and type the word "single" and have the answer in a few seconds:

Except when the manual is wrong. You have to go into the Segmented menu to find the option to change it.

They must have moved it around.

Still, the clue is there...
 

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #100 on: February 09, 2023, 11:35:30 am »
Except when the manual is wrong. You have to go into the Segmented menu to find the option to change it.

Hi Dave!  When I start from a preset (little green button), it works as described in the manual.  I tried this with both the older 1.1.2 FW and the current 1.2 FW.  I can make a short video if you like, but if you hit Preset, then Acquisition -> N-single/Avg count, the value should be editable (default value is 1), and Run Single should work as expected (make a single acquisition unless you tell it otherwise).

Enabling "Acquisition -> Segmented -> Acquire Maximum" does gray out the acquisition count (since, well, maximum is maximum :)).  My guess is that this got set somehow during a previous session.  A tool tip or some other indication that this is enabled might be helpful here.

As someone who spent 20 years demonstrating loaner instruments to customers, I'm a big fan of the "Preset" button.  Can't count the number of hours I spent scratching my head trying to figure out an issue that was due to some setting that I either hadn't made or had forgotten that I had made :)

Thanks for the video!

Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, luudee

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #101 on: February 09, 2023, 11:48:42 am »
Except when the manual is wrong. You have to go into the Segmented menu to find the option to change it.

Hi Dave!  When I start from a preset (little green button), it works as described in the manual.  I tried this with both the older 1.1.2 FW and the current 1.2 FW.  I can make a short video if you like

Short video :)  [Screen capture only, no audio]

Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, luudee

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #102 on: February 09, 2023, 12:57:04 pm »
Except when the manual is wrong. You have to go into the Segmented menu to find the option to change it.

Hi Dave!  When I start from a preset (little green button), it works as described in the manual.  I tried this with both the older 1.1.2 FW and the current 1.2 FW.  I can make a short video if you like, but if you hit Preset, then Acquisition -> N-single/Avg count, the value should be editable (default value is 1), and Run Single should work as expected (make a single acquisition unless you tell it otherwise).

Enabling "Acquisition -> Segmented -> Acquire Maximum" does gray out the acquisition count (since, well, maximum is maximum :)).  My guess is that this got set somehow during a previous session.  A tool tip or some other indication that this is enabled might be helpful here.

As someone who spent 20 years demonstrating loaner instruments to customers, I'm a big fan of the "Preset" button.  Can't count the number of hours I spent scratching my head trying to figure out an issue that was due to some setting that I either hadn't made or had forgotten that I had made :)

Thanks, but you shouldn't have to hit preset to do that!
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, goaty

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #103 on: February 09, 2023, 01:00:30 pm »
If only there were things called manuals where you could go and type the word "single" and have the answer in a few seconds:
Except when the manual is wrong. You have to go into the Segmented menu to find the option to change it.
They must have moved it around.
Still, the clue is there...

Sure, but I found it anyway, it just wasn't at all obvious on first use. And it's still not clear how/why it's enabled/disabled with the various related options I showed. I think the implementation is a bit of a mess for what is otherwise a great feature.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #104 on: February 09, 2023, 01:51:17 pm »
Thanks, but you shouldn't have to hit preset to do that!

Preset just returns the instrument to the default settings.  In my (sometimes painful) experience at two major T&M instrument manufacturers, it can be easy to forget about or overlook a setting, so Preset just allows you to start from a known state with default values.

Preset is so useful that most major T&M companies have some version of it -- it actually drives me crazy when I'm trying to use an instrument (even something as simple as a function generator or programmable power supply) that doesn't have some kind of preset. :)

It would be helpful (as I think a YouTube commenter said) to have something that tells you why a parameter is grayed out.  I'll definitely feed that back to our product teams.
Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 
The following users thanked this post: Someone, egonotto, tooki, luudee

Online Bud

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6912
  • Country: ca
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #105 on: February 09, 2023, 02:18:34 pm »
"Preset" button can be confusing if all it does is loading default settings. It should be called "Reset" instead. Presets (at least to my view) should be customer configurable.
Facebook-free life and Rigol-free shack.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, tooki, Anthocyanina

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #106 on: February 09, 2023, 03:07:09 pm »
"Preset" button can be confusing if all it does is loading default settings. It should be called "Reset" instead. Presets (at least to my view) should be customer configurable.

Loading default ("factory") settings is the normal behavior of preset in almost all of the (probably over 100) instruments I've used in my career. 

That said, some instruments also have a "User Preset" that basically does a preset and then loads user settings - i.e. a "customer configurable preset" [ Specified attachment is not available ]

The MXO4 supports both types :)
Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, Kean

Offline Rich@RohdeScopesUSA

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 457
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #107 on: February 09, 2023, 03:07:49 pm »
Noise values ​​for one "Industry-leading system architecture: 18-bit vertical resolution/12-bit ADC" are not so exceptional low as R&S would like them to be.

For MXO4 is stated - RMS noise floor ( HD mode ??? active for bandwidth ≤ 500 MHz)

sensitivity:

HDO4: analog bandwidth   1 GHz               LeCroy HDO  1 GHz

0.5 mV/    98 µV                                                       
1 mV/       104 µV                                                         145 μVrms
2 mV/       116 µV                                                         145 μVrms
5 mV/       152 µV                                                         150 μVrms
10 mV/      238 µV                                                        155 μVrms
20 mV/      436 µV                                                        185 μVrms
50 mV/      1.01 mV                                                      275 μVrms
100 mV/    2.47 mV                                                      500 μVrms
200 mV/    4.43 mV                                                      1.75 mVrms
500 mV/    10.13 mV                                                    2.75 mVrms
1 V/div      19.96 mV                                                    4.90 mVrms

For example, every LeCroy HD Oscilloscope has in sensitivity over 2mV  significantly better values, partly 4x better!

That is not bashing, only pure facts.
This is why we post our noise figures - so people can decide what is most important to them.  In our research talking to customers, the smaller volt/div settings were the most painful for them when noisy (e.g. see the Marco Reps video above).  If you think of it as a percent of scale, versus just an absolute number (I believe LeCroy uses eight vertical divisions versus ten for us), you can see noise is much more impactful at the smaller volt/div settings.  This is also true as you move up in bandwidth - the signals are typically smaller with less margin for error, so having better noise performance on the smaller settings becomes more important.

             R&S                                              LeCroy   
Scale   RMS Noise              % of Full Scale   RMS Noise   % of Full Scale
0.001   0.000104              1.0%                   0.000145     1.8%
0.002   0.000116              0.6%                   0.000145     0.9%
0.005   0.000152              0.3%                   0.00015     0.4%
0.01           0.000238              0.2%                   0.000155     0.2%
0.02           0.000436              0.2%                   0.000185     0.1%
0.05           0.00101              0.2%                   0.000275     0.1%
0.1           0.00247              0.2%                   0.0005     0.1%
0.2           0.00443              0.2%                   0.00175     0.1%
0.5           0.01013              0.2%                   0.00275     0.1%
1           0.01996              0.2%                   0.0049   0.1%

But again, your needs may vary.  Wish we never had to make design tradeoffs, but like everyone, we do.

-Rich
« Last Edit: February 09, 2023, 03:10:38 pm by Rich@RohdeScopesUSA »
 
The following users thanked this post: nctnico, Someone, egonotto, 2N3055, pdenisowski, luudee, Detlev

Offline bozidarms

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • Country: at
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #108 on: February 09, 2023, 04:07:58 pm »
Quote
If you think of it as a percent of scale, versus just an absolute number (I believe LeCroy uses eight vertical divisions versus ten for us), you can see noise is much more impactful at the smaller volt/div settings.

Thank you for your efforts.
Well, whether it's 1% or 0.1% full scale in the end doesn't matter.
If a signal is smaller than own oscilloscope noise, is and stay it  invisible.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2023, 04:09:39 pm by bozidarms »
 

Offline egonotto

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 723
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #109 on: February 09, 2023, 04:11:03 pm »
Hallo,

@Rich@RohdeScopesUSA:

However, RMS is not the right measure here. Better is peak to peak or the really visible width of the noise band.


But I would be interested to know why LeCroy HDO 1 GHz at 1 V/div is so much better. Especially compared to RTA4004, even if this is 1.25 V/div in comparison to 1 V/div.


Best regards
 

Offline 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6662
  • Country: hr
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #110 on: February 09, 2023, 04:14:01 pm »
Hallo,

@Rich@RohdeScopesUSA:

However, RMS is not the right measure here. Better is peak to peak or the really visible width of the noise band.


But I would be interested to know why LeCroy HDO 1 GHz at 1 V/div is so much better. Especially compared to RTA4004, even if this is 1.25 V/div in comparison to 1 V/div.


Best regards

Every scope frontend is combination of attenuators and amplifiers...
It all ends up how you combine them in the end...
How you combine them is also influenced with needed offset ranges...

Making a scope is the ultimate art of compromise..
 
The following users thanked this post: Rich@RohdeScopesUSA, pdenisowski

Offline Rich@RohdeScopesUSA

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 457
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #111 on: February 09, 2023, 04:20:34 pm »
Hallo,

@Rich@RohdeScopesUSA:

However, RMS is not the right measure here. Better is peak to peak or the really visible width of the noise band.


But I would be interested to know why LeCroy HDO 1 GHz at 1 V/div is so much better. Especially compared to RTA4004, even if this is 1.25 V/div in comparison to 1 V/div.


Best regards
I hear you - but no one specs Vpp because it can be impacted by so many other things (e.g. update rate - you'll catch the outliers more often with a faster update rate).  With that said, see @2N3055's comment above. It's really true.

-Rich
 
The following users thanked this post: 2N3055

Offline Rich@RohdeScopesUSA

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 457
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #112 on: February 09, 2023, 04:22:55 pm »
Quote
If you think of it as a percent of scale, versus just an absolute number (I believe LeCroy uses eight vertical divisions versus ten for us), you can see noise is much more impactful at the smaller volt/div settings.

Thank you for your efforts.
Well, whether it's 1% or 0.1% full scale in the end doesn't matter.
If a signal is smaller than own oscilloscope noise, is and stay it  invisible.
No worries - I'm happy to help and I really appreciate your comments too.  And what you said is the challenge - pulling a small signal out of the noise.  Since that is more likely to be really hard at small volt/div settings with tiny signals, that is why we focused there. 

-Rich
 

Offline bozidarms

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • Country: at
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #113 on: February 09, 2023, 04:25:55 pm »
In fact, Lecroy noise - numbers are even better than proclamated.

Quote
For MXO4 is stated - RMS noise floor ( HD mode ??? active for bandwidth ≤ 500 MHz)

How is actually, big noise by MXO4 in normal - 12 bit mode?
« Last Edit: February 09, 2023, 04:39:24 pm by bozidarms »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Online tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28381
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #114 on: February 09, 2023, 07:27:04 pm »
"Preset" button can be confusing if all it does is loading default settings. It should be called "Reset" instead. Presets (at least to my view) should be customer configurable.
Many new instruments are.
It's a very convenient feature to return your scope to your preferred setup with a single button press rather than need to recall a previously saved Setup however they can be very useful for more specific tasks in that you can save several.
Avid Rabid Hobbyist
Siglent Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@SiglentVideo/videos
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #115 on: February 09, 2023, 10:43:47 pm »
However, RMS is not the right measure here. Better is peak to peak or the really visible width of the noise band.

Peak to peak noise can greatly depend on the sample rate and waveform update rate. i.e. all thing being equal, a faster update rate scope will appear "noisier".
This is why RMS noise is used for comparison.
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #116 on: February 09, 2023, 10:51:49 pm »
"Preset" button can be confusing if all it does is loading default settings. It should be called "Reset" instead. Presets (at least to my view) should be customer configurable.
Loading default ("factory") settings is the normal behavior of preset in almost all of the (probably over 100) instruments I've used in my career. 

Most scopes have a dedicated Default button which is different from the user Preset function. Keysight, Tek, Lecroy, Rigol, Siglent, GW Instek all call it Default.
R&S is the standout here in calling it Preset.
Yes, the Preset button on the MXO4 is actually the Default function, I would not have guessed that without trying it. "PreSet" in english means literally as it says, "pre", i.e. you have set up the configuration before you Set the function.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2023, 11:00:44 pm by EEVblog »
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #117 on: February 09, 2023, 10:57:38 pm »
"Preset" button can be confusing if all it does is loading default settings. It should be called "Reset" instead. Presets (at least to my view) should be customer configurable.
Many new instruments are.
It's a very convenient feature to return your scope to your preferred setup with a single button press rather than need to recall a previously saved Setup however they can be very useful for more specific tasks in that you can save several.

In the case of the MXO4 the Preset button works as the Default button on other scopes. You can set it up in the setting to a user defined function though, but by default, it's Default function as per all other scopes.
 

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26907
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #118 on: February 09, 2023, 11:24:48 pm »
Yes, the Preset button on the MXO4 is actually the Default function, I would not have guessed that without trying it. "PreSet" in english means literally as it says, "pre", i.e. you have set up the configuration before you Set the function.
Maybe this is the RF background of R&S leaking into the user interface. On RF equipment there is no default button but a Preset button to set the equipment to default settings.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki

Online tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28381
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #119 on: February 10, 2023, 12:13:31 am »
Yes, the Preset button on the MXO4 is actually the Default function, I would not have guessed that without trying it. "PreSet" in english means literally as it says, "pre", i.e. you have set up the configuration before you Set the function.
Maybe this is the RF background of R&S leaking into the user interface. On RF equipment there is no default button but a Preset button to set the equipment to default settings.
Yes I see lots of Preset on anything RF whereas scopes all seem to use Default.
Either way, factory Default/Preset is the default option and User definable Defaults/Presets in a couple of forms available too. Some assign user settings to a Default/Preset while in older gear this could also be done as a Setup, just not as quickly/easily recalled.
Avid Rabid Hobbyist
Siglent Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@SiglentVideo/videos
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #120 on: February 10, 2023, 08:00:22 am »
The MXO4 locked up on me again while shooting a clip on the digital logic analyser.
Similar lockup result to last time.
The bug last time was that I operated the buad rate decode control too quickly. We'll see what it was this time.

 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16670
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #121 on: February 10, 2023, 08:23:18 am »
Peak to peak noise can greatly depend on the sample rate and waveform update rate. i.e. all thing being equal, a faster update rate scope will appear "noisier".
This is why RMS noise is used for comparison.

Shouldn't it be standard deviation to eliminate any DC offset?
 

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16670
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #122 on: February 10, 2023, 08:27:29 am »
The MXO4 locked up on me again while shooting a clip on the digital logic analyser.
Similar lockup result to last time.
The bug last time was that I operated the buad rate decode control too quickly. We'll see what it was this time.



Weird that all the menus and stuff keep working. They need to add a watchdog to the acquisition engine/FPGA.
 

Offline goaty

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 205
  • Country: de
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #123 on: February 10, 2023, 09:16:15 am »
Software is not easy to design. I think a lot of 'traditional' companies did and do struggle with good software design.
I remember the remote control of a Canton speaker for TV which was ridculous as well as the 'Rademacher' remote control system for blinds.
In the end, R&S is also probably has not the 'Google'-level of software development...
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #124 on: February 10, 2023, 09:40:23 am »
Peak to peak noise can greatly depend on the sample rate and waveform update rate. i.e. all thing being equal, a faster update rate scope will appear "noisier".
This is why RMS noise is used for comparison.

Shouldn't it be standard deviation to eliminate any DC offset?

Yes, also called AC RMS.

 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #125 on: February 10, 2023, 09:41:05 am »
Software is not easy to design. I think a lot of 'traditional' companies did and do struggle with good software design.

The amount of software in a scope like this would be massive.
 

Offline egonotto

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 723
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #126 on: February 10, 2023, 04:20:33 pm »
However, RMS is not the right measure here. Better is peak to peak or the really visible width of the noise band.

Peak to peak noise can greatly depend on the sample rate and waveform update rate. i.e. all thing being equal, a faster update rate scope will appear "noisier".
This is why RMS noise is used for comparison.

Hello,

a misunderstanding has occurred. My submission refers to a table of Rich@RohdeScopesUSA in which he relates the RMS noise to the height of the entire screen, as if the RMS noise were measuring the width of the visible noise.

Table of Rich@RohdeScopesUSA:
"
             R&S                                              LeCroy   
Scale   RMS Noise              % of Full Scale   RMS Noise   % of Full Scale
0.001   0.000104              1.0%                   0.000145     1.8%
0.002   0.000116              0.6%                   0.000145     0.9%
0.005   0.000152              0.3%                   0.00015     0.4%
0.01           0.000238              0.2%                   0.000155     0.2%
0.02           0.000436              0.2%                   0.000185     0.1%
0.05           0.00101              0.2%                   0.000275     0.1%
0.1           0.00247              0.2%                   0.0005     0.1%
0.2           0.00443              0.2%                   0.00175     0.1%
0.5           0.01013              0.2%                   0.00275     0.1%
1           0.01996              0.2%                   0.0049   0.1%

"

Best regard
egonotto

 
The following users thanked this post: bozidarms

Offline bozidarms

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • Country: at
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #127 on: February 10, 2023, 08:21:25 pm »
Quote
Quote from: goaty on Today at 09:16:15 am

    Software is not easy to design. I think a lot of 'traditional' companies did and do struggle with good software design.


The amount of software in a scope like this would be massive.

Are we talking here as beta testers on one unfinished (far eastern provenance) product, or we talking over one serious, expensive, industrial quality instrument?
« Last Edit: February 10, 2023, 08:28:22 pm by bozidarms »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #128 on: February 10, 2023, 10:04:55 pm »
I was able to reproduce the bug:
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #129 on: February 10, 2023, 10:16:27 pm »
Are we talking here as beta testers on one unfinished (far eastern provenance) product, or we talking over one serious, expensive, industrial quality instrument?

My Keysight 3000 literally went up in flames and released the magic smoke on its launch day.
An Extech multimeter blew up in my hands.
Rigol scopes have had too many bugs to count.
The list could go on.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, tooki, bozidarms, 2N3055, eplpwr

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26907
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #130 on: February 10, 2023, 10:55:47 pm »
As a rule of thumb: don't buy anything after it has just been released. This goes for about anything more complicated than a hammer and not just test equipment. Wait a year or two for the serious teething issues to be ironed out.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, 2N3055

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #131 on: February 10, 2023, 11:03:10 pm »
Banana version... 8)
But someone has to buy it before all the bugs are fixed.
First of all, to find bugs that may not be found in development or simply overlooked.
Secondly, if no one buys it and everyone would just wait, why improve something that (apparently) has no takers.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline Rich@RohdeScopesUSA

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 457
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #132 on: February 10, 2023, 11:12:08 pm »
My Keysight 3000 literally went up in flames and released the magic smoke on its launch day.
Thought I was going to lose my job on this one :palm:  Fortunately I didn't  :-+ 

-Rich
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, Kean, tooki, 2N3055, luudee

Offline bozidarms

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • Country: at
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #133 on: February 11, 2023, 04:12:12 am »
Just recently, i bought a new car and then, unfortunately it turned out that the engine is not yet working as it should,
i couldn't drive it.
After further consideration fell out that the problem was in software engineering.
So after year or two, car was repaired and i was so blissful. :-DD
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #134 on: February 11, 2023, 05:40:04 am »
My Keysight 3000 literally went up in flames and released the magic smoke on its launch day.
Thought I was going to lose my job on this one :palm:  Fortunately I didn't  :-+ 

I can remember sitting there thinking "They were kind enough to send me this nice scope, should I show people that it actually blew up?" a few seconds later... "Yeah, bugger it, it's hilarious!"
Keysight got way more mileage of goodwill out of the rapid response to the issue than any potential damage to their image.
 
The following users thanked this post: bozidarms, 2N3055, luudee

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #135 on: February 11, 2023, 05:42:42 am »
As a rule of thumb: don't buy anything after it has just been released. This goes for about anything more complicated than a hammer and not just test equipment. Wait a year or two for the serious teething issues to be ironed out.

That approach doesn't work if you want or need a leading edge bit of kit.
Happens in software too. Altium and its (in)famous bugs for example. You want the new features released and you accept that there are likely to be a ton of bugs in the new upgrade.
 

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16670
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #136 on: February 11, 2023, 07:21:16 am »
Are we talking here as beta testers on one unfinished (far eastern provenance) product, or we talking over one serious, expensive, industrial quality instrument?

Software is complicated no matter what country it's written in. I'm sure there's horror stories from every single brand.

I'd even believe that the more expensive something is, the more places there are to screw up the design. Cutting edge is cutting edge.

No product manager these days is ever going to say "let's just use it internally for another six months and see if any bugs turn up".
 

Offline bozidarms

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • Country: at
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #137 on: February 11, 2023, 07:50:41 am »
Quote
Software is complicated no matter what country it's written in. I'm sure there's horror stories from every single brand.

I'd even believe that the more expensive something is, the more places there are to screw up the design. Cutting edge is cutting edge.

No product manager these days is ever going to say "let's just use it internally for another six months and see if any bugs turn up".

I don't quite understand the logic behind that statement, but as long as the potential buyer is willing to accept it, i have no problem with that.
I personally would never do anything like that, or when I buy a great, expensive product (car, TV set...), i expect from the beginning everything to work perfectly (drive easily, perfect picture...).
Don't see any reason why would be different with measuring equipment.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2023, 08:03:38 am by bozidarms »
 

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16670
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #138 on: February 11, 2023, 08:03:56 am »
when I buy a great, expensive product (car, TV set...), i expect everything to work perfectly (drive easily, perfect picture...).

Both of those frequently have 'recalls' and they both get firmware updates these days.
 

Online tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28381
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #139 on: February 11, 2023, 08:17:06 am »
I personally would never do anything like that, or when I buy a great, expensive product (car, TV set...), i expect from the beginning everything to work perfectly (drive easily, perfect picture...).
Don't see any reason why would be different with measuring equipment.
Seems you live in some other universe.  :-//

All brands have had problems, HW and SW.
Maybe your weren't alive when Tek had the famous TDS200 worldwide recall ?
Avid Rabid Hobbyist
Siglent Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@SiglentVideo/videos
 

Offline BU508A

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4527
  • Country: de
  • Per aspera ad astra
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #140 on: February 11, 2023, 02:00:52 pm »
Quote
Software is complicated no matter what country it's written in. I'm sure there's horror stories from every single brand.

I'd even believe that the more expensive something is, the more places there are to screw up the design. Cutting edge is cutting edge.

No product manager these days is ever going to say "let's just use it internally for another six months and see if any bugs turn up".

I don't quite understand the logic behind that statement, but as long as the potential buyer is willing to accept it, i have no problem with that.
I personally would never do anything like that, or when I buy a great, expensive product (car, TV set...), i expect from the beginning everything to work perfectly (drive easily, perfect picture...).
Don't see any reason why would be different with measuring equipment.

May I introduce you to the theory of complexity?
In essence: the more complex a system is, the more likely is that it has errors and/or flaws in it.

It all depends on your definition of "working perfectly" and how high you are setting the level.
“Chaos is found in greatest abundance wherever order is being sought. It always defeats order, because it is better organized.”            - Terry Pratchett -
 
The following users thanked this post: Martin72

Offline bozidarms

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • Country: at
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #141 on: February 11, 2023, 03:47:31 pm »
Quote
May I introduce you to the theory of complexity?
OK, many thanks, finally i got it - so, if I buy something complex and expensive then it is completely wrong to expect that this device should work properly, because the more complex a system is, the more likely is that it has errors and/or flaws in it. :-+ :-+ :-+

Really interesting way of thinking and perfect excuse for work which is only partially done.
If i would think that way at my job, than i would have a lot of free time ::)


Quote
Maybe your weren't alive when Tek had the famous TDS200 worldwide recall ?
Ha ha, I was alive at that time (guess i am your age), only not so interested in electronics.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2023, 04:00:12 pm by bozidarms »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline maxwell3e10

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 869
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #142 on: February 11, 2023, 04:25:15 pm »
Somehow people cut much more slack for software than hardware errors. Remember how much bad press Intel got for a division bug in Pentiums. But software and firmware bugs are totally accepted. I wouldn't say that software is intrinsically more complicated than designing and making a big processor. Yet hardware gets more and more powerful while software gets more and more bloated while still having mostly the same functionality.

More relevant to this thread, we need to compare oscilloscope noise spectra because rms noise does not tell the whole story. For example, Lecroy HDO has better noise RMS numbers than Rigol HDO, yet Rigol has a better spectrum:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/rigol-hdo1000-and-hdo4000-12bit-oscilloscopes-launched-in-china/msg4436329/#msg4436329
Also having a low noise level at low sensitivity vertical scale (like 1V/div) is the whole point of a high-resolution scope.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2023, 04:33:13 pm by maxwell3e10 »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, tooki, Jacon, mawyatt

Offline bozidarms

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • Country: at
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #143 on: February 11, 2023, 04:38:03 pm »
 maxwell3e10,
thanks for explanation.

Could you also comment why MXO4 as a HD (12 bit and more) system has DC gain accuracy of ±1 % full scale to ±1.5 % full scale, almost as 8 bit system (LeCroy HDO has 0,5%)?
« Last Edit: February 11, 2023, 04:42:14 pm by bozidarms »
 

Offline maxwell3e10

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 869
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #144 on: February 11, 2023, 04:54:15 pm »
You would need to ask Rich. I am not sure if DC accuracy is something people focus on in an oscilloscope. It also depends on the details of the self-calibration procedure.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2023, 04:55:59 pm by maxwell3e10 »
 
The following users thanked this post: bozidarms

Offline luudee

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 274
  • Country: th
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #145 on: February 11, 2023, 05:07:48 pm »
Somehow people cut much more slack for software than hardware errors. Remember how much bad press Intel got for a division bug in Pentiums. But software and firmware bugs are totally accepted. I wouldn't say that software is intrinsically more complicated than designing and making a big processor. Yet hardware gets more and more powerful while software gets more and more bloated while still having mostly the same functionality.
...

Traditionally, a lot more testing and verification has been put in to hardware. I have been doing ASIC design
for over 30 years. I have also done some software development (C/C++).

To manufacture an ASIC, the NRE is anywhere between $1Mil USD, 20 years ago, 180nm node, to about
$10Mil USD, Samsung 8nm node, 4 years ago. Because of the high cost, a lot more effort is being put in to
making HW to be correct the first time. Everything from functional verification, to toggle coverage to various
timing analysis had to be 100%. 

Since FPGAs have taken over a lot of the low-volume market, HW/chip designers have lost the art of making
hardware that works the first time around. We now see "firmware" upgrades that not only include software but
also hardware fixes in FPGA bit streams.

I bet the "freeze" Dave found in the MXO4 is from some FPGA ... the GUI appears to work just fine.

Overall, I believe it has become much less critical to properly verify and test hardware and software, since it
has become so easy to provide and install updates. I still vividly remember the times, when a software update
meant for a vendor to ship two 27xxx EEPROMS which you had to physically replace on a device motherboard.

As such, I believe all equipment we will see in this day and age will suffer from incomplete/faulty HW and SW.
It has become so cheap and convenient to issue a fix at  a later date, that I bet many of these vendors purposely
leave out features and function for a later date. Time-to-Market has become the driving force.

Comparing today's "equipment" to what was manufactured 20 years ago, I believe, the designs were much more
mature, complete and though through 20 years ago that they are today.


luudee
 
The following users thanked this post: nctnico, Someone, egonotto, tv84, tooki, Fgrir, bozidarms, 2N3055, maxwell3e10, Jacon, mawyatt

Offline mawyatt

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3269
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #146 on: February 11, 2023, 09:01:53 pm »
Somehow people cut much more slack for software than hardware errors. Remember how much bad press Intel got for a division bug in Pentiums. But software and firmware bugs are totally accepted. I wouldn't say that software is intrinsically more complicated than designing and making a big processor. Yet hardware gets more and more powerful while software gets more and more bloated while still having mostly the same functionality.
...

Traditionally, a lot more testing and verification has been put in to hardware. I have been doing ASIC design
for over 30 years. I have also done some software development (C/C++).

To manufacture an ASIC, the NRE is anywhere between $1Mil USD, 20 years ago, 180nm node, to about
$10Mil USD, Samsung 8nm node, 4 years ago. Because of the high cost, a lot more effort is being put in to
making HW to be correct the first time. Everything from functional verification, to toggle coverage to various
timing analysis had to be 100%. 

Since FPGAs have taken over a lot of the low-volume market, HW/chip designers have lost the art of making
hardware that works the first time around. We now see "firmware" upgrades that not only include software but
also hardware fixes in FPGA bit streams.

I bet the "freeze" Dave found in the MXO4 is from some FPGA ... the GUI appears to work just fine.

Overall, I believe it has become much less critical to properly verify and test hardware and software, since it
has become so easy to provide and install updates. I still vividly remember the times, when a software update
meant for a vendor to ship two 27xxx EEPROMS which you had to physically replace on a device motherboard.

As such, I believe all equipment we will see in this day and age will suffer from incomplete/faulty HW and SW.
It has become so cheap and convenient to issue a fix at  a later date, that I bet many of these vendors purposely
leave out features and function for a later date. Time-to-Market has become the driving force.

Comparing today's "equipment" to what was manufactured 20 years ago, I believe, the designs were much more
mature, complete and though through 20 years ago that they are today.


luudee

That is so true regarding the ASIC NRE, maybe even on the low side. Our over decade old CLASS ASIC for DARPA was ~$50M and worked the first time, with only ~1B transistors (massive Systolic Array). Recall Intel spending $100s of Millions on processor chip development long ago and Apple spent ~$1B on the initial M1 chip set development.

With those kind of numbers and the huge wafer mask set costs for SOTA Digital CMOS processes (reruns), one better get the design right the first time, as errors are quickly career limiting :o

The Digital ASIC design folks have the benefit of some very good (an expensive) CAD tools from Cadence, Synopsis and others. Analog ASIC designs folks, the CAD tools available aren't as refined, and much more emphasis and risk is placed upon the designer.

If you really want to dive into the risk pool of ASIC design, try the merging of Digital and Analog/RF like our first Microwave Systems on Chip dating back to ~2000, which hosted multiple processors, DSP, memory, DACs, ADCs and entire frequency agile Microwave Receiver/Transmitter on a single SOTA SiGe BiCMOS process chip!!

Even today with low cost PCBs available it seems that some hardware designs are just thrown together and get fixed by PCB iteration, and the Firmware/Software is just riddled with numerous bugs.

However, do think generally the "A Grade" TE OEMs do a better job with new equipment introductions, they have the people and financial resources to do a more thorough job before releasing a new product, and the cost shows such!! Some of the better "B Grade" OEMs seem to do a better job before releasing a new product than others, and seem to have found an attractive cost/bug ratio cost*bug product!!

Anyway, old seasoned ASIC designers may have a different perspective on things than folks that have never attempted a complex ASIC :-+

Best, 
« Last Edit: February 11, 2023, 11:43:23 pm by mawyatt »
Curiosity killed the cat, also depleted my wallet!
~Wyatt Labs by Mike~
 
The following users thanked this post: EEVblog, 2N3055, salvagedcircuitry

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #147 on: February 12, 2023, 01:36:58 am »
Quote
Software is complicated no matter what country it's written in. I'm sure there's horror stories from every single brand.

I'd even believe that the more expensive something is, the more places there are to screw up the design. Cutting edge is cutting edge.

No product manager these days is ever going to say "let's just use it internally for another six months and see if any bugs turn up".

I don't quite understand the logic behind that statement, but as long as the potential buyer is willing to accept it, i have no problem with that.
I personally would never do anything like that, or when I buy a great, expensive product (car, TV set...), i expect from the beginning everything to work perfectly (drive easily, perfect picture...).
Don't see any reason why would be different with measuring equipment.

Volume, target market, and technical needs are very different between a car and a high end oscilloscope.
But car are not immune, Tesla's for example are (in)famous for software bugs that not only impact the software experience but also extend to hardware functionality.
 
The following users thanked this post: bozidarms, 2N3055

Offline mawyatt

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3269
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #148 on: February 12, 2023, 03:29:58 am »
One likely reason for the relatively few hardware bugs vs. the typical large number of firmware/software bugs we are accustom too is the hardware bug may require a return and PCB replacement (high OEM cost). Whereas, the firmware/ software bugs are usually rectified by having the user download the prior bug correcting revision (low OEM cost), only to usually introduce new bugs  :o

So the OEM bean counters decide that spending some verification resources on the new product hardware has a better ROI than on firmware/software!!

The mentioned Intel processor computational error vs. Microsoft's bug riddled Windows OS is a great example, and somehow Mr Gates has conditioned us with continual software/firmware revisions loaded with new bugs as acceptable. Can you imagine what additional flack Intel would have gathered if they had introduced the replacement processor with one that had a new bug!!

Best,   
« Last Edit: February 12, 2023, 03:44:43 am by mawyatt »
Curiosity killed the cat, also depleted my wallet!
~Wyatt Labs by Mike~
 

Offline 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6662
  • Country: hr
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #149 on: February 12, 2023, 09:31:36 am »
One likely reason for the relatively few hardware bugs vs. the typical large number of firmware/software bugs we are accustom too is the hardware bug may require a return and PCB replacement (high OEM cost). Whereas, the firmware/ software bugs are usually rectified by having the user download the prior bug correcting revision (low OEM cost), only to usually introduce new bugs  :o

So the OEM bean counters decide that spending some verification resources on the new product hardware has a better ROI than on firmware/software!!

The mentioned Intel processor computational error vs. Microsoft's bug riddled Windows OS is a great example, and somehow Mr Gates has conditioned us with continual software/firmware revisions loaded with new bugs as acceptable. Can you imagine what additional flack Intel would have gathered if they had introduced the replacement processor with one that had a new bug!!

Best,

That Intel bug was a reason to introduce formal verification in Intel for verification of designs..
But don't worry, they still make them with bugs even today. It is just they are not as blatant as basic FP instructions..
And all Intel processor for many years, can do actual microcode updates. At boot time, a BIOS loads a a microcode patch into CPU.. So they are sort of software updatable, not much unlike FPGA. They still have to have at least part of instruction set  function properly so the can execute BIOS, but yeah software patches are reality on CPU too..
They can even load nev CPU instructions...

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/best-practices/microcode-update-guidance.html

Sad part is that software development could be formally verified and there were great developments on that in 80ies and 90ies but once business side realized they could save money by not doing any of that and by lawyering up and desensitizing users to accept "bugs are normal" philosophy, things went downhill fast...

« Last Edit: February 12, 2023, 09:56:25 am by 2N3055 »
 
The following users thanked this post: tv84, maxwell3e10, eplpwr, zrq, mawyatt, luudee

Offline Domitronic

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 102
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #150 on: February 20, 2023, 08:37:29 pm »

I just saw the video and Daves enthusiasm about the probes. To me these probes look very much like the PML High-Z probe series from german company PMK:

http://www.pmk.de/en/products/pml_high_z_tastkoepfe

However they are only available up to 500MHz from PMK. So not exactly the same i guess. But other data like the 1650V peak and 9.5pF is the same. And the look is pretty similar as well. Does somebody know if the R&S probes are made by PMK? This could also explain why the probes are labeled with made in Germany.
 
The following users thanked this post: EEVblog

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #151 on: February 20, 2023, 09:09:58 pm »

I just saw the video and Daves enthusiasm about the probes. To me these probes look very much like the PML High-Z probe series from german company PMK:

http://www.pmk.de/en/products/pml_high_z_tastkoepfe

However they are only available up to 500MHz from PMK. So not exactly the same i guess. But other data like the 1650V peak and 9.5pF is the same. And the look is pretty similar as well. Does somebody know if the R&S probes are made by PMK? This could also explain why the probes are labeled with made in Germany.

Looks indenital in every way, right down the split in the probe end and the arrow.
Manual is fully branded R&S but has identitcal pictures and other info to the PMK manual, so 100% sure made by PMK. Nice find.
Price?
 

Offline Momchilo

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 98
  • Country: de
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #152 on: February 20, 2023, 09:16:18 pm »
A lot of the passive Lecroy probes are also PMK probes. You can buy the linked 500MHz probe (PML 711A-RO) at Batronix for 327€ incl. VAT. It is the Lecroy PP008 probe.
« Last Edit: February 20, 2023, 09:42:52 pm by Momchilo »
 

Offline mkissin

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 117
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #153 on: February 20, 2023, 09:34:23 pm »
Looking at it, I'm fairly sure the same is true of the keysight passive probes, like the N2894A.
Everybody rebrands the current probes too, I just don't think there's enough ability to differentiate product to make it worthwhile putting the R&D into them.
 

Offline Domitronic

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 102
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #154 on: February 20, 2023, 09:47:52 pm »
A lot of the passive Lecroy probes are also PMK probes. You can buy the linked one at Batronix for 327€ incl. VAT. It is the Lecroy PP008 probe.

Yes, i know. And a few month back you could get the PML 711A-RO around 220 € incl VAT. Seems that they increased prices drastically. Luckily i bought them at the old price last year.
« Last Edit: February 20, 2023, 09:49:54 pm by Domitronic »
 

Offline Hydron

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 988
  • Country: gb
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #155 on: February 20, 2023, 09:53:48 pm »
Sadly it's hard to get hold of the much more unique PMK 20x probes - these look to be a good balance between input C and attenuation (you can get lower input capacitance in a 100x but at a massive attenuation cost, while the 20x ones are quite a bit lower than the 10x while not throwing too much signal out the window).
 
The following users thanked this post: 2N3055

Offline jjoonathan

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 783
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #156 on: February 21, 2023, 01:14:54 am »
Speaking of the PMK 20x probes, I always wondered if the 1GHz Tek probes weren't using the same trick to extend bandwidth. Does anyone here have a pair handy to measure?
 

Offline BU508A

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4527
  • Country: de
  • Per aspera ad astra
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #157 on: February 21, 2023, 06:10:57 am »
Sadly it's hard to get hold of the much more unique PMK 20x probes - these look to be a good balance between input C and attenuation (you can get lower input capacitance in a 100x but at a massive attenuation cost, while the 20x ones are quite a bit lower than the 10x while not throwing too much signal out the window).

Seems, the PML series has some 20:1 probes. I've attached the datasheet here as well.



« Last Edit: February 21, 2023, 06:13:02 am by BU508A »
“Chaos is found in greatest abundance wherever order is being sought. It always defeats order, because it is better organized.”            - Terry Pratchett -
 

Offline maxwell3e10

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 869
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #158 on: February 22, 2023, 02:52:24 am »
Since MXO4 claims a record in waveform updates/sec, it would be good to know how the update rate changes with the number of channels turned on at the same time and the number of waveform points that is more than the minimum.
 

Offline nimish

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 148
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #159 on: February 23, 2023, 04:28:15 am »
Somehow people cut much more slack for software than hardware errors. Remember how much bad press Intel got for a division bug in Pentiums. But software and firmware bugs are totally accepted. I wouldn't say that software is intrinsically more complicated than designing and making a big processor. Yet hardware gets more and more powerful while software gets more and more bloated while still having mostly the same functionality.
...

Traditionally, a lot more testing and verification has been put in to hardware. I have been doing ASIC design
for over 30 years. I have also done some software development (C/C++).

To manufacture an ASIC, the NRE is anywhere between $1Mil USD, 20 years ago, 180nm node, to about
$10Mil USD, Samsung 8nm node, 4 years ago. Because of the high cost, a lot more effort is being put in to
making HW to be correct the first time. Everything from functional verification, to toggle coverage to various
timing analysis had to be 100%. 

Since FPGAs have taken over a lot of the low-volume market, HW/chip designers have lost the art of making
hardware that works the first time around. We now see "firmware" upgrades that not only include software but
also hardware fixes in FPGA bit streams.

I bet the "freeze" Dave found in the MXO4 is from some FPGA ... the GUI appears to work just fine.

Overall, I believe it has become much less critical to properly verify and test hardware and software, since it
has become so easy to provide and install updates. I still vividly remember the times, when a software update
meant for a vendor to ship two 27xxx EEPROMS which you had to physically replace on a device motherboard.

As such, I believe all equipment we will see in this day and age will suffer from incomplete/faulty HW and SW.
It has become so cheap and convenient to issue a fix at  a later date, that I bet many of these vendors purposely
leave out features and function for a later date. Time-to-Market has become the driving force.

Comparing today's "equipment" to what was manufactured 20 years ago, I believe, the designs were much more
mature, complete and though through 20 years ago that they are today.


luudee

Who is taping out an 8nm ASIC for $10M? Can they share their alien technology?

When it costs in the millions for a mask-set respin I'm not surprised SW has to pick up the tab. The issue is that good SWE cost a lot of $ and HW companies simply don't pay enough. Why would you work on hard EDA/firmware problems when you can write JS for 4x the $?
 

Offline luudee

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 274
  • Country: th
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #160 on: February 23, 2023, 05:30:17 am »

Who is taping out an 8nm ASIC for $10M? Can they share their alien technology?

Not sure how to react to your silly post. 4 years ago we taped out an 8 nm ASIC with Samsung, NRE was about $9.8 Mil USD.
That did not include the $800K for back end services (3rd party), and god only know how much on engineering ...


When it costs in the millions for a mask-set respin I'm not surprised SW has to pick up the tab. The issue is that good SWE cost a lot of $ and HW companies simply don't pay enough. Why would you work on hard EDA/firmware problems when you can write JS for 4x the $?

lol


 

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16670
  • Country: 00
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #161 on: February 23, 2023, 06:34:31 am »
Overall, I believe it has become much less critical to properly verify and test hardware and software, since it
has become so easy to provide and install updates.

This.

By the time the marketing machine has got the software into people's hands there's usually an "update available".
 
The following users thanked this post: luudee

Offline nimish

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 148
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #162 on: February 23, 2023, 07:53:08 pm »

Who is taping out an 8nm ASIC for $10M? Can they share their alien technology?

That did not include the $800K for back end services (3rd party), and god only know how much on engineering ...

Sure, if you exclude all of the actual costs then you can make it as cheap as you like...

lol

I've heard of ~ $10MM for a full TSMC 7nm mask-set, maybe Samsung low-balled you since their 8nm sucked.
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #163 on: February 24, 2023, 12:56:38 am »
I've heard of ~ $10MM for a full TSMC 7nm mask-set, maybe Samsung low-balled you since their 8nm sucked.

Does anyone else ever think about the insaneness of just casually mentioning geometries like this?
One companies 7nm is great, but anothers 8nm sucks.
8 NANO meters!  :o
*insert mind blow emoji*
 

Offline mawyatt

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3269
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #164 on: February 24, 2023, 01:43:01 am »
Now go figure what an individual MosFet cost in a production chip ::)

Mind blowing indeed!!

Best,
Curiosity killed the cat, also depleted my wallet!
~Wyatt Labs by Mike~
 

Offline luudee

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 274
  • Country: th
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #165 on: February 24, 2023, 04:54:12 am »

I've heard of ~ $10MM for a full TSMC 7nm mask-set, maybe Samsung low-balled you since their 8nm sucked.


Remember, the mask NRE fluctuates very widely. When a new node comes out, you can see quotes as high
as $20Mil. This typically falls very quickly over the next 12 months, and then keeps on falling much slower for
the rest of the nodes' life. Since then, TSMC introduced 5nm, 3nm and is working on 2nm. Yes, Dave it's insane!

Yes, you are right, Samsung 8nm wasn't as great as TSMCs 7nm. But when you are not Apple or Qualcomm,
(and a couple of other stars), you'll never get into TSMC ... even GIC will not return you calls/emails ....


luudee
 

Offline nimish

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 148
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #166 on: February 24, 2023, 06:49:29 pm »

I've heard of ~ $10MM for a full TSMC 7nm mask-set, maybe Samsung low-balled you since their 8nm sucked.


Remember, the mask NRE fluctuates very widely. When a new node comes out, you can see quotes as high
as $20Mil. This typically falls very quickly over the next 12 months, and then keeps on falling much slower for
the rest of the nodes' life. Since then, TSMC introduced 5nm, 3nm and is working on 2nm. Yes, Dave it's insane!

Yes, you are right, Samsung 8nm wasn't as great as TSMCs 7nm. But when you are not Apple or Qualcomm,
(and a couple of other stars), you'll never get into TSMC ... even GIC will not return you calls/emails ....


luudee

Of course. That's just the mask set cost, not including the tens of millions/hundreds of millions in salaries, verification, IP and such. And since Samsung's "8nm" was "10nm++" I guess that you got a great price on an old node even 4 years ago.

Re TSMC: definitely not on the very latest nodes since Apple etc have bought up the entire capacity. Older nodes like 7FF are definitely available....but you are a small fry to TSMC.

By the way the node names have nothing to do with anything physical on the chip anymore, they are just marketing names. Nothing on the TSMC 3nm is actually 3nm except maybe thin film thickness
 

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #167 on: April 08, 2023, 10:15:59 pm »
Batronix (not only) offering the MXO4-BNDL promo.
1.5Ghz, all decoders, bode, function-gen included.
For only 23681€  :P ;D

https://www.batronix.com/shop/oscilloscopes/Rohde-Schwarz-MXO4-BNDL.html
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, luudee

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #168 on: April 09, 2023, 10:07:07 am »
Batronix (not only) offering the MXO4-BNDL promo.
1.5Ghz, all decoders, bode, function-gen included.
For only 23681€  :P ;D

Bargin if your company capex limit is €25k
 
The following users thanked this post: pdenisowski

Offline zhoneybee

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 3
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #169 on: April 30, 2023, 12:35:40 am »
Would this scope be a good choice for me? I figured it'd be good to ask here instead starting another "which scope?" thread.

I work on embedded firmware, these days smart-home devices operating in 900 MHz band. My office has DS1104Zs for us firmware guys and an older 3 GHz Tek MDO with a built-in spectrum analyzer claimed by our EE, but I'd like to have my own bit of kit. I'd prefer at least 200 MHz of bandwidth with an upgrade path to 1+ GHz, 4 analog channels, and I2C / SPI decoding. I2S would be nice too. I admittedly don't know whether a built-in SA is worth the premium for me; I don't get enough opportunity with the one at work to become proficient.

In terms of budget, I'd feel great at $5k USD, good at $10k, and stretched thin by $20k. Before the MXO4 had been announced, I'd been looking at a Keysight MSOX3204G. The MXO4 out-specs it in a lot of ways and has a SA, but the MSO and protocol-decoding options drive the price up to $14k, and at that point I'm sorely tempted just to buy the bundle. At the same time my ill-nurtured thrifty side is encouraging me to seriously consider what I truly need and budget accordingly. The dream would be to pick up an MXO4 at the base price and purchase a promotional bundle of options for a song later on, but that might just be a dream.

Any advice? I'm open to suggestions for other scopes too.
 

Online tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28381
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #170 on: April 30, 2023, 12:48:19 am »
................

Any advice? I'm open to suggestions for other scopes too.
Welcome to the forum.

The $3,690 SDS5034X is worthy of consideration too with upgrade available to 500 Mhz however to go higher you need the more expensive SDS5054X.
See here:
https://siglentna.com/product/bandwidth-upgrade-500-to-1-ghz-2-channel-models/
Avid Rabid Hobbyist
Siglent Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@SiglentVideo/videos
 
The following users thanked this post: zhoneybee

Offline zhoneybee

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 3
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #171 on: April 30, 2023, 12:58:52 am »
................

Any advice? I'm open to suggestions for other scopes too.
Welcome to the forum.

The $3,690 SDS5034X is worthy of consideration too with upgrade available to 500 Mhz however to go higher you need the more expensive SDS5054X.
See here:
https://siglentna.com/product/bandwidth-upgrade-500-to-1-ghz-2-channel-models/

Thanks, I'll review that. Is it not an option to purchase the SDS5034X, upgrade to 500 MHz, and later upgrade to 1 GHz?
 

Online tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28381
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #172 on: April 30, 2023, 01:01:58 am »
................

Any advice? I'm open to suggestions for other scopes too.
Welcome to the forum.

The $3,690 SDS5034X is worthy of consideration too with upgrade available to 500 Mhz however to go higher you need the more expensive SDS5054X.
See here:
https://siglentna.com/product/bandwidth-upgrade-500-to-1-ghz-2-channel-models/

Thanks, I'll review that. Is it not an option to purchase the SDS5034X, upgrade to 500 MHz, and later upgrade to 1 GHz?
Yup you certainly can do that but entry cost is higher at $5,890.
They have a better front end for the higher BW's.  ;)
Avid Rabid Hobbyist
Siglent Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@SiglentVideo/videos
 
The following users thanked this post: zhoneybee

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #173 on: April 30, 2023, 01:31:59 am »
Quote
I figured it'd be good to ask here instead starting another "which scope?" thread.

Hm?
This is a model-specific thread here... ;)
 
The following users thanked this post: Someone, Fgrir

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #174 on: April 30, 2023, 01:44:35 am »
Would this scope be a good choice for me?

Yes, it would be an excellent choice :)

I admittedly don't know whether a built-in SA is worth the premium for me; I don't get enough opportunity with the one at work to become proficient.

And what better way to become proficient than having a scope with SA? :)  In all honesty, I can't say that "everyone needs spectrum analysis" because that simply isn't true.  However, in my experience, once someone learns how and when to use spectrum analysis, it becomes very hard for them to use a scope without it:  there are many, many cases where looking at spectrum can help solve or identify an issue that would be very difficult to see in the time domain.

The dream would be to pick up an MXO4 at the base price and purchase a promotional bundle of options for a song later on, but that might just be a dream.

I can't comment on future promotions or bundle options, but I can tell you that the MXO4 is an entirely new generation of oscilloscopes and is about as "future proof" as you can get in terms of performance and support across the entire T&M industry.  We spent many years developing the MXO and its custom ASIC (which is where most of the cutting edge specs come from), and we are adding significant functions and features with each new release.

Obviously, I'm just a little biased here, but the MXO is the first oscilloscope I've been really excited about in a long time :)
Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 
The following users thanked this post: Someone, luudee, zhoneybee

Offline jjoonathan

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 783
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #175 on: April 30, 2023, 03:36:14 am »
Lively FFTs with spectrum analyzer controls are amazing when sniffing around for a signal that has been highly attenuated or superimposed on another. Even at low frequency the extreme dynamic range of spectrum analysis is a very useful complement to time domain capabilities. That's what brought me to R&S scopes, the MXO clearly takes it to the next level, and I've been sorely tempted by the MXO4 even though I really need to wait for the MXO6 (or whatever it winds up being called).
 
The following users thanked this post: shabaz, Someone, pdenisowski

Offline shabaz

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 145
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #176 on: April 30, 2023, 02:07:18 pm »
Hi! I think even non-regular-users of standalone spectrum analyzers will frequently find themselves using the SA capability on the MXO, they will pick up the benefits of it quickly. It is easier to use than older FFT functions in 'scopes, and different from the swept spectrum analyzers in terms of speed and the view it provides.

There's some video capture of it here. Often it can be challenging to see from the oscilloscope trace if there even is a problem (and where it could be originating from), but the spectral view reveals it.
(from time 9min24sec):



« Last Edit: April 30, 2023, 02:22:34 pm by shabaz »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, pdenisowski

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #177 on: May 01, 2023, 11:08:13 am »
I can't comment on future promotions or bundle options, but I can tell you that the MXO4 is an entirely new generation of oscilloscopes and is about as "future proof" as you can get in terms of performance and support across the entire T&M industry.  We spent many years developing the MXO and its custom ASIC (which is where most of the cutting edge specs come from), and we are adding significant functions and features with each new release.
Obviously, I'm just a little biased here, but the MXO is the first oscilloscope I've been really excited about in a long time :)

The Keysight Megazoom IV ASIC is now over 12 years old  :o
Not even a sniff of the Megazoom V...

i still haven't done the teardown of the MXO  8)
 
The following users thanked this post: jusaca, pdenisowski

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #178 on: May 01, 2023, 11:16:52 am »
Would this scope be a good choice for me? I figured it'd be good to ask here instead starting another "which scope?" thread.

I work on embedded firmware, these days smart-home devices operating in 900 MHz band. My office has DS1104Zs for us firmware guys and an older 3 GHz Tek MDO with a built-in spectrum analyzer claimed by our EE, but I'd like to have my own bit of kit. I'd prefer at least 200 MHz of bandwidth with an upgrade path to 1+ GHz, 4 analog channels, and I2C / SPI decoding. I2S would be nice too. I admittedly don't know whether a built-in SA is worth the premium for me; I don't get enough opportunity with the one at work to become proficient.

Nothing comes close to the MXO4 in terms of integrated spectrum analyser capability. It's pretty much a world apart from other scopes.

Quote
In terms of budget, I'd feel great at $5k USD, good at $10k, and stretched thin by $20k. Before the MXO4 had been announced, I'd been looking at a Keysight MSOX3204G. The MXO4 out-specs it in a lot of ways and has a SA, but the MSO and protocol-decoding options drive the price up to $14k, and at that point I'm sorely tempted just to buy the bundle. At the same time my ill-nurtured thrifty side is encouraging me to seriously consider what I truly need and budget accordingly. The dream would be to pick up an MXO4 at the base price and purchase a promotional bundle of options for a song later on, but that might just be a dream. Any advice? I'm open to suggestions for other scopes too.

Talk to your local dealer, they might be able to do something for you in terms of bundling?
I'm not sure the Keysight 3000 would outspec the MXO in anything?
 
The following users thanked this post: pdenisowski, zhoneybee

Offline zhoneybee

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 3
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #179 on: May 02, 2023, 02:43:18 am »
...
Talk to your local dealer, they might be able to do something for you in terms of bundling?
I'm not sure the Keysight 3000 would outspec the MXO in anything?

It doesn't, but it does include everything I know that I need for less than the MXO4 with the options I'd want. The specs were adequate (more than adequate, really) when I'd first considered it as an option, and they still are.

Good point with the local dealer, I'll investigate.
 

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26907
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #180 on: May 02, 2023, 09:05:56 am »
If your use case includes protocol decoding, then you will want deep memory as well. Keep in mind that the actual memory depth in normal use cases is 1/4th at most of what it says on the sticker on the Megazoom based Keysight scopes.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6662
  • Country: hr
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #181 on: May 02, 2023, 10:39:33 am »
If your use case includes protocol decoding, then you will want deep memory as well. Keep in mind that the actual memory depth in normal use cases is 1/4th at most of what it says on the sticker on the Megazoom based Keysight scopes.

That is very true, but...

Megazoom extracts data for decoding directly from input by use of comparator. It does not convert analog data to digital.
So when you are decoding, even if signal looks very bad in analog domain, decode will work just fine.
That is the reason why Keysight users don't complain so much about long memory when decoding...
It is not as good as proper long memory scope but not as bad as it might seem..

But anyways, MXO4 is much more modern scope. Only thing that is working for Megazooms is that MXO4 still don't have all the same  protocols   supported...
 

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26907
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #182 on: May 02, 2023, 10:42:12 am »
If your use case includes protocol decoding, then you will want deep memory as well. Keep in mind that the actual memory depth in normal use cases is 1/4th at most of what it says on the sticker on the Megazoom based Keysight scopes.

That is very true, but...

Megazoom extracts data for decoding directly from input by use of comparator. It does not convert analog data to digital.
So when you are decoding, even if signal looks very bad in analog domain, decode will work just fine.
My experience is different. One of the things lacking is an adjustable hysterisis which can mess up decoding on Keysight scopes.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Offline 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6662
  • Country: hr
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #183 on: May 02, 2023, 10:47:34 am »
If your use case includes protocol decoding, then you will want deep memory as well. Keep in mind that the actual memory depth in normal use cases is 1/4th at most of what it says on the sticker on the Megazoom based Keysight scopes.

That is very true, but...

Megazoom extracts data for decoding directly from input by use of comparator. It does not convert analog data to digital.
So when you are decoding, even if signal looks very bad in analog domain, decode will work just fine.
My experience is different. One of the things lacking is an adjustable hysterisis which can mess up decoding on Keysight scopes.
3000T works much better than old 7000...
But still I agree with you, there are better scopes for the money today..unless you specifically need some feature in which case that is what matters..
 

Offline Sighound36

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 549
  • Country: gb
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #184 on: May 02, 2023, 02:05:19 pm »
I have the 1.5Ghz model coming later in the week, we'll see how it stacks up against the HDO6000B, the introductory deals R&S are offering currently makes this a genuine proper high end scope for semi sensible outlay, although the probe costs maybe the sticking point.

However I am keen to see the FFT in action, as I have always felt R&S offer the best RF abilities of the big four, although Keysight has some quality instruments here as well.

Just in the process of acquiring an FSW so a few more members of the bench are now from Munich!
« Last Edit: May 02, 2023, 05:38:32 pm by Sighound36 »
Seeking quality measurement equipment at realistic cost with proper service backup. If you pay peanuts you employ monkeys.
 
The following users thanked this post: jjoonathan, 2N3055, pdenisowski, Martin72

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #185 on: May 03, 2023, 12:30:48 am »
the introductory deals R&S are offering currently makes this a genuine proper high end scope for semi sensible outlay, although the probe costs maybe the sticking point.

Third party probes?
 

Offline TopQuark

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 323
  • Country: hk
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #186 on: May 03, 2023, 02:21:12 am »
A bit weird that a 12-bit scope of this calibre does not have power analysis.

Is it on the development roadmap, and is it going to be a paid option? Kinda sucks if you get the all included bundle deal today, but have to pay again for power analysis down the road.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, Martin72

Offline Sighound36

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 549
  • Country: gb
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #187 on: May 03, 2023, 03:14:59 am »
Hi Dave

My thoughts on this, people who are going to purchase one of these fine scopes imho primarily for the low noise capability as well the FFT performance

For that performance to be fully realised I would suggest that correctly R&S interfaced probes would give a better result although always happy to be proved wrong especially in the wallet department!

That said I did have  a demonstration hew micsig fibre optic probe a week or so back and its a far more preferable option that Lecroys offering , plus its pretty darn good as well accuracy wise

I feel it will come down to the option & probe costs for the person purchasing the scope

Currently my Lecroy probe count stands at 22 so to swap maybe cost prohibitive

Yes you can make some respectable DIY probes that would work no question, although I would suspect that the majority of potential purchases will opt for the factory options

Will also take into account that its new product and they have been making firmware changes regularly to keep onto of the teething troubles also its not like Keysights MXR failed at starting gate damp squib.
R&S being very proactive with this unit imho

The MX04 is due Friday so will report over the weekend

« Last Edit: May 03, 2023, 10:02:51 am by Sighound36 »
Seeking quality measurement equipment at realistic cost with proper service backup. If you pay peanuts you employ monkeys.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, 2N3055, pdenisowski, Martin72

Offline tv84

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3221
  • Country: pt
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #188 on: May 03, 2023, 10:08:27 am »
The MX04 is due Friday so will report over the weekend

Must confess that I have high expectations regarding your MXO4 vs LeCroy comparisons.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, Martin72

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #189 on: May 03, 2023, 12:22:26 pm »
A bit weird that a 12-bit scope of this calibre does not have power analysis.

Is it on the development roadmap, and is it going to be a paid option?

Yes, power analysis is on the MXO4 roadmap and is being actively worked on right now.

Question:  are there any particular features or functions you'd like in power analysis and/or do you have a list of requirements?  We're very interested :)

Edit:  yes, it will be a paid option, similar to our other oscilloscopes that support this (K31 option)

https://scdn.rohde-schwarz.com/ur/pws/dl_downloads/dl_common_library/dl_brochures_and_datasheets/pdf_1/Option_sheet_-_RTx-K31__power_analysis_v1.10.pdf

But again, we're interested in hearing feedback about what you'd like / need in a power analysis option.  If you post (or PM) your feedback, I can guarantee that our product management team will see it :)
« Last Edit: May 03, 2023, 12:26:29 pm by pdenisowski »
Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 
The following users thanked this post: EEVblog, Martin72

Offline shabaz

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 145
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #190 on: May 04, 2023, 03:03:01 pm »
I have a suggestion, I hope it is useful; maybe it could be interesting as part of K31 to have an app to perform double pulse testing.  The waveform generator has more than enough performance for this.
It would be neat if the app could automatically show the inductance, as well as turn-on time and reverse recovery, as either measurements, or in different colours or different windows. Basically, the problem this would solve is that it would become a handy app to solve inductance, saturation, diode and MOSFET measurements. It could be called a "Semiconductor Testbed" or "Semiconductor Efficiency" app (even though it would also provide inductor measurements) especially if more features were added to the app in future.
This can be done without K31 today, but would require AWG capability to construct the double pulse, and would probably end up using all the math channels depending on how much of it was desired to be automated on the display. I don't entirely have a full idea currently regarding the best way for such an app's workflow or display the results, but at first thought it seems like a useful problem to solve.

Also, as a benefit to all users (not just K31), it would be nice if the harmonics feature could trickle down to a general harmonic distortion measurement capability, along with the remote control commands for it, because there are uses beyond power analysis tasks for that, i.e. kill two birds with one stone. It would be great for quick audio analysis. Incidentally, remote control commands to access the spectrum trace would be neat too (currently it requires file transfer).

Anyway, I hope these ideas are useful.
« Last Edit: May 04, 2023, 04:18:06 pm by shabaz »
 
The following users thanked this post: Someone, egonotto, jusaca, pdenisowski

Offline TopQuark

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 323
  • Country: hk
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #191 on: May 04, 2023, 04:08:34 pm »
Another thing that could be really interesting for power analysis could be magnetics characterization (B-H curve).

Say you have to characterize a ferrite core, I think the gist of it would look something like: Wind two winding, primary for magnetizing the core, secondary winding for sensing.

- AWG drives primary, an amplifier is probably needed to get reasonable current into the primary to drive it into saturation.
- Measure current into primary + have user input number of pri turns and you get field strength (H), roughly.
- Measure and integrate secondary voltage + have user input number of sec turns and you get flux density (B), roughly.
- Plot in XY and you should have a BH curve.
- Stuff like saturation flux density, coercive force, remanence, hysteresis losses etc. can be calculated with maths.
- Some kind of offset/servo is probably needed to keep the secondary voltage integration in check.
- AWG allows measurement of B-H curves across different frequencies.

Something like that, idk.
 
The following users thanked this post: shabaz, pdenisowski

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #192 on: May 04, 2023, 05:25:59 pm »
Do we have this on our HD ?  :D
Our two "great" lecroy have it.

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #193 on: May 04, 2023, 06:13:29 pm »
Anyway, I hope these ideas are useful.

Another thing that could be really interesting for power analysis could be magnetics characterization (B-H curve).

Thanks for the feedback!  I'll definitely pass them on to our scope product management team.
Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #194 on: May 04, 2023, 09:04:31 pm »
Do we have this on our HD ?  :D
Our two "great" lecroy have it.

Description of the PA option :

https://teledynelecroy.com/options/productseries.aspx?mseries=441&groupid=22




Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #195 on: May 04, 2023, 11:08:23 pm »
Another thing that could be really interesting for power analysis could be magnetics characterization (B-H curve).

Say you have to characterize a ferrite core, I think the gist of it would look something like: Wind two winding, primary for magnetizing the core, secondary winding for sensing.

- AWG drives primary, an amplifier is probably needed to get reasonable current into the primary to drive it into saturation.
- Measure current into primary + have user input number of pri turns and you get field strength (H), roughly.
- Measure and integrate secondary voltage + have user input number of sec turns and you get flux density (B), roughly.
- Plot in XY and you should have a BH curve.
- Stuff like saturation flux density, coercive force, remanence, hysteresis losses etc. can be calculated with maths.
- Some kind of offset/servo is probably needed to keep the secondary voltage integration in check.
- AWG allows measurement of B-H curves across different frequencies.

Something like that, idk.

Even if niche, that sort of stuff looks very impressive in marketing campaings, just say'n  ;)
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #196 on: May 04, 2023, 11:11:26 pm »
For that performance to be fully realised I would suggest that correctly R&S interfaced probes would give a better result although always happy to be proved wrong especially in the wallet department!

Ultimately though, there is nothing special about same manufacturer intergated probes, they are interface nicers. It comes down the specs. A third party probe may actually have better performance than the ones from the manufacturer, but you might have to set it up maually which isn't a huge deal.
 

Offline Sighound36

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 549
  • Country: gb
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #197 on: May 05, 2023, 05:32:03 pm »
Well R&S UK delivered on their promise, early this morning UPS duly dropped off a demo bundle version of the MX04 with some probes I requested.

Just taken it out of its substanical protective packaging, not the usual R&S Germanic semi boat anchor build,but we are talking one tier above entry level for R&S, the inital feel and touch of the unit to me is a wee bit tacky. However we have to take into account of the price bracket and features/build costs and in use ability before making any comments. Size is nice its on par with the newer Siglents SDS2000 & 6000 models, Lecoy's Wave surfer HD etc. Front panel protector fits a lot easier than the afore mentioned units.

More over the weekend.

Seeking quality measurement equipment at realistic cost with proper service backup. If you pay peanuts you employ monkeys.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, Martin72

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #198 on: May 05, 2023, 07:22:38 pm »
Here some "true" screenshots of the power analyzer option, the menus..
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline Sighound36

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 549
  • Country: gb
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #199 on: May 05, 2023, 07:30:14 pm »
Hi Martin

 I have some of the Lecroy PA option  in use if you like.

Seeking quality measurement equipment at realistic cost with proper service backup. If you pay peanuts you employ monkeys.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, Martin72

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #200 on: May 05, 2023, 07:42:33 pm »
Nice one  :-+
We use the spectrum and power options from our lecroys(WR and HDO) far too infrequently, but it's good to know we have them ;)

Offline Sighound36

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 549
  • Country: gb
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #201 on: May 10, 2023, 06:10:12 pm »
So having been living with the MX04 for a few days now, easy size on the bench, screen works well pretty glare free, not really going to say to much at the moment other than the FFT is one of the most nicest & intutive to set up on a scope (given it's a scope not a SA!).
Been playing around with some PLL's in the last week thought it would make a good test given they are low frequency.
One really simple but nice feature, when saving to a usb stick the MX04 automatically creates a dedicated folder (labelled MX04 unsprisingly!) and files them away according, simple but a nice touch imho.
This is also one VERY quiet piece of equipment, like almost whisper quiet!


More to following in the coming weeks...


« Last Edit: May 11, 2023, 06:02:07 pm by Sighound36 »
Seeking quality measurement equipment at realistic cost with proper service backup. If you pay peanuts you employ monkeys.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, jjoonathan, 2N3055, jusaca, pdenisowski, Martin72

Offline Sighound36

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 549
  • Country: gb
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #202 on: May 10, 2023, 08:58:32 pm »
Some of the MX04 comparsions being performed back to back with a Lecroy 6054HD) & Wavepro 404HD.



« Last Edit: May 11, 2023, 04:53:12 pm by Sighound36 »
Seeking quality measurement equipment at realistic cost with proper service backup. If you pay peanuts you employ monkeys.
 
The following users thanked this post: EEVblog, egonotto, jjoonathan, 2N3055, pdenisowski, Martin72

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #203 on: May 11, 2023, 02:16:53 am »
This is also one VERY quiet piece of equipment, like almost whisper quiet!

Underrated feature in test gear IMO.
 
The following users thanked this post: jusaca, pdenisowski, derree

Offline Sighound36

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 549
  • Country: gb
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #204 on: May 11, 2023, 05:06:25 pm »
With today's lab areas being generally samller, personally I find that quietness & physical size are more important than they used to be, the MX04 is the quietest digital (Possibly of all of the) scope (s) I have every had here in the lab, no small achievement.

Today, I have charactorising some filters and taking a look in depth at some GDPSO supply rails with the MX04, possibly over the weekend some protocol analysis with I2C as well.

A couple more really neat features the FR (Bode plot) wizard is a dream to use & the quick zoom button is cool as well.

Jury is out on the functionality of the screen layout, while the drop down menu's are comprehensive they are also a little distracting for myself.

Onwards and upwards as they say.

« Last Edit: May 11, 2023, 06:05:13 pm by Sighound36 »
Seeking quality measurement equipment at realistic cost with proper service backup. If you pay peanuts you employ monkeys.
 
The following users thanked this post: EEVblog, 2N3055, pdenisowski, Martin72

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #205 on: May 11, 2023, 07:16:14 pm »
I really, really like this scope.... ;) 8)
 
The following users thanked this post: jjoonathan, pdenisowski

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #206 on: May 12, 2023, 11:43:12 am »
Jury is out on the functionality of the screen layout, while the drop down menu's are comprehensive they are also a little distracting for myself.

I find the UI a bit "all over the shop" is the best description. Some thing are great, others you ask why they did that.
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki

Offline Sighound36

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 549
  • Country: gb
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #207 on: May 12, 2023, 03:18:03 pm »
Hi Dave

I would suggest that is a fair assement of what I'm seeing here as well. It's like they have tgaken the other scope manufucturers GUI's and borrowed certain aspects and stuck it togther. Some items are great others are little more than an after thought, zoom discriptor box would be nice as well. It's not that intuitive as well as it's my 6th day with the MX04. These can be rectified in FW so its not a earth shattering issue I feel.

Some indepth look at cabling on Leo Bodnar clock (usb powered) using the 12 bit zoom on both the R&S and Lecroy same setting on both scopes and using both BNC outputs simultaneously. No HD or ERES filters applied using max bandwidth on both scopes 5GS/s SR & 2.5K samples on each scope HTB 50ns / VTA 250mV with 960mV offset

Cable A is a very well known quality T&E 50Ohm coax type BW 6GHz. Cable B is more suitable for higher daylight number upto 26Ghz both are 50Ohm impedance terminations.



Seeking quality measurement equipment at realistic cost with proper service backup. If you pay peanuts you employ monkeys.
 
The following users thanked this post: EEVblog, egonotto

Offline Sighound36

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 549
  • Country: gb
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #208 on: May 12, 2023, 06:23:43 pm »
Some images of MX04 using the fully active ZD-10 differential probe on a low level clock signal in conjunction with the FFT both in peak table  & peak on waveform mode. I did notice that the if you either of these two options the wave form pattern plus the harmonic marker lines & FFT itself pulsate (very fast) possible in time with the spectrum sweep speed?  Its distracting in the least. The peak table so far as I can work out itsn't moveable on the screen (happy to be assisted here though!)
Probe set up and calibration simple and intutitive scope recognised all the different probes I have with the MX04 no problem as it should be.
Still amazed by how quiet this scope is, its uncanny  8) Second monitor output is spot on and a very useful, the Lecroy's have this feature in 4K, Rigol does as well though 1080P, either way its handy to have imho.

« Last Edit: May 13, 2023, 09:20:32 am by Sighound36 »
Seeking quality measurement equipment at realistic cost with proper service backup. If you pay peanuts you employ monkeys.
 
The following users thanked this post: EEVblog, egonotto, trophosphere, Martin72, Detlev

Offline Sighound36

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 549
  • Country: gb
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #209 on: June 07, 2023, 03:04:18 pm »
This board will not let post this review, I have tried splitting up the posts into two still comes back with this error

No profanity in there or didgy links any ideas?

"Please try again. If you come back to this error screen, report the error to an administrator."
« Last Edit: June 07, 2023, 03:20:48 pm by Sighound36 »
Seeking quality measurement equipment at realistic cost with proper service backup. If you pay peanuts you employ monkeys.
 
The following users thanked this post: tv84, 2N3055, Martin72

Offline tv84

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3221
  • Country: pt
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #210 on: June 07, 2023, 06:27:01 pm »
R&S MXO4 review round up by @Sighound36:

"Rhode collected the scope at the end of last week, though Dillbert here forgot to pack the scope cover! (Insert appropriate idiot gag here lol) All rectified now.

I would like to thank the team @ R&S UK for their quality service and back throughout the process particularly Joel Jessop & project manager oscilloscopes @ R&S UK Nick Le Bas who’s technical feedback and assistance has been first class.

The MX04 had been with me for over two weeks, I made of point of using it exclusively for my day-to-day R&D, debug and audio investigations. Only used the Lecroy’s for direct comparison purposes.
Well in the previous posts you can read my thoughts on the use of the instrument.

So, to the round up:

Thoughts on the experience which the scope imparted on myself were very positive.

I would like to point out first that we have been 12-bit scope users for over four years, so we are well versed in their benefits of much lower noise & higher accuracy measurement potential. We are an SME company and have five employees and are involved with ultra-quiet power supplies/IoT development (home & wearable tech) some EV work /Green energy projects/Digital audio products. The company has 20+ scopes in various locations and eight of them are Lecroy’s so we are no strangers to 12bit accuracy.

The Rhode & Schwarz MX04 is the company’s first venture into 12-bit ADC scope production and for myself its really good first entrance into this segment of the market. Its nice constructed, great form factor sits on the bench easily and comfortably. Screen is good and I love the bezel less formfactor these days. Probes mount and dismount with a quality feel, and engage with that clunk you would expect from a name like R&S.
The scope boot up time is pretty ‘smick’ as Dave would utter, from memory its under a minute or there abouts.The one item that really strikes you, is this scope is seriously quiet, it is deathly quiet, although that’s all down to being totally embedded hardware I suspect and Nick informed that the FFT has its own processing section as well (which I suspected due to the speed of said feature!)
Stock memory is 400Meg and let’s be honest for most users this is more than they will every use, although expandable to 800Meg should you wish (cost option)
Its sample rate on two channels is the norm for this instrument sector Lecroy’s Wavesurfer 4000HD is 5GS/s on two channels, Rigol DHO4000 is 4GS/s and the Siglent SDS6000A is 5GS/s.
So, the MX04 is one really neat package that’s quiet as a whisper with lack of bench presence (space wise), great screen with nice touch gesture ability as well.

Connectivity is all there, RJ45/USB/HDMI/Ref in etc/DSO 16 channels and options twin channel generator.
4.5 million wave forms impressive, 18-bit humm only available with the 20Mhz BW restriction in place and realistically its between 14 & 16bits depending on what BW and sample rate you are using.
Loan scope I used didn’t come with the digital probe set so I can’t comment on that aspect of the scope sorry.

The MX04 fast acquisition time, images on the screen looked crisp and clean easy to identify signal fluctuations and time lapse triggering set up points when looking for those rare event captures.
The FFT is in all honest what I expect from agreeably the best RF measurement company today (maybe the Keysight UXA has some claim to that). Anyway, its fast, precise, easy to read and to SET up one area I appreciated over my Lecroy. The image presented is top draw in the FFT department.
R&S know RF like very few others, so if I was going to entice potential sales from other scope manufacturers why not play to my strengths, it will attract certain buyers no question and that is what all this is really about sales after all.

Given that R&S are relative newcomers to the scope market, they have come on a long way since they entered this market and given, they are privately owned it shows commitment to longer term projects and ranges.

Summing up, this scope warrants more detailed reply than the half baked Keysight MXR offering three years ago (nine of the circles I more in industry wise use these devices I found yet)

What I liked:
  • Compact & clean lines on the MX04
  • Its inconspicuousness on your lab or work bench due to its formfactor and quietness did I mention its very quiet!
  • Boot up time & screen clear & crisp views
  • Accuracy, repeatability & instrument confidence for myself VERY IMPORTANT
  • ****Pricing**** see below.
  • HDMI output also very good, for myself this would be a deal breaker for others no.
  • Probe quality, identification & calibration excellent.

Not so liked:

  • The GUI, sorry it’s a mishmash of Keysight/Teledyne/R&S take ways, way too busy. Yes, lots of drop-down options but no flow to using the instrument.
  • Resolution enhancement HD yes all the others have a software defined type of filter, but having an HD button that lights up well ok? 18 bits @ 20Mhz or less I know it’s all number crunching but did it really give my anything that I don’t already have Er... no.
  • The lights that are around the main rotary knobs are a little bright and distracting (Personal I know).
  • When in zoom mode, no indication of that, a zoom descriptor box next to the channel being used box would also be helpful.
  • Being able to use the mouse to click and highlight the portions of the waveform of interest to appear rather that showing that four-way arrow indicator.
  • When the FFT peak table or marker functions, on a split screen both the FFT & waveform ‘pulsated’ at the same time possibly on the sweep?
  • The peak table I just couldn’t move it from the lower left-hand corner which I found strange, used both fingers and mouse. With the frequency markers on the harmonic spurs which were nice and ledge able they looked worse as the two screens pulsed.
  • The lack of decoding & serial data apps is telling at the moment, I know that a power analysis app is in the pipeline soon.

Some of them may seem small gripes which I can see and understand, however if you are going to lay out this coinage then you need to feel comfortable with all aspects of your chosen instrument and this for some maybe a sticking point, for others no issues, fully appreciate that.

If having a ‘smick’ FFT and 18 bits in a nice rounded package for you then the MX04 must be on your audition list near the top.

Costings, when this was released the top of line model was close on 30K, today 9 months later the top-of-the-line model with all options and gennys is around 19K for the 1Ghz model I was loaned (plus vat here in the UK). A 200Mhz basic model is £7460 which I would suggest is tempting for a few folks and SME’s I feel. Not sure this is a hacker special though lol

Do I feel it was the world’s most powerful scope? Some, marketing blurb yes lol, yes it more than capable in multiple areas and does that very well indeed and without fuss. However not once did I feel hey, I missing something here apart from the very slick FFT and set up menu absolutely 100% its just right no question.
The Lecroy’s are computationally more powerful (just not geared for 4M waveforms plus) with dedicated apps & the way their MAUI OS runs, but they are powerful PC’s in essence. In fairness the MX04 is ahead of the Wavesurfer 4000HD same sample rate and runs 2.5GS/s on all four channels and slightly better than the HDO4000 which has 10GS/s rate. Though these have far more apps and mature OS.

That said, firmware and features will grow with the R&S MX04 over time, it’s a new platform and with their future ranges not too far away and greater bandwidths and sample rates in the offering there is a lot of promise that will be delivered by R&S I feel.

The package has been engineered to shake up the market and they (R&S) have worked hard to achieve this level of performance. Respect is due here.
Would I change for the MX04, no we are too far down the Lecroy road and probe costs are the biggest outlay here. However as good as the MX04 and it is decent, it’s no 6000 series Lecory, but you do pay a premium for this. IMHO the GUI is far more intuitive and useable, plus the tool box apps are many and very in depth. Very mature software with regular updates. The fact there is no Jitter/power integrity /power conversion /full serial embedded debug is critical for ourselves.
For other potential purchased this may not register for you.

What I can say is this if you are in the market for a quality scope at realistic pricing and are stuck in 8 bit land then, the R&S MX04 should be on your demonstration list no question at all.

Thoroughly recommended B+/A-"

by Sighound36
 
The following users thanked this post: EEVblog, nctnico, 2N3055, pdenisowski, Martin72, Detlev

Offline tv84

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3221
  • Country: pt
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #211 on: June 07, 2023, 06:34:14 pm »
A big thanks to Sighound36 for his review (I was just the poster). I asked him to put in words his recent enjoyable sessions with the MXO4 and, this time, he wrote plenty! IMO that (subconsciously) says a lot of his experience.
 
The following users thanked this post: 2N3055, pdenisowski, Martin72

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #212 on: June 07, 2023, 08:02:51 pm »
Big thanks to the review!
Hopefully R&S will listen to the "not so likes"....

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #213 on: June 07, 2023, 10:12:21 pm »
Big thanks to the review!
Hopefully R&S will listen to the "not so likes"....

Yes, we're definitely listening :)

I can't publicly comment on the MXO4 roadmap, but some of the "not so likes" are already being addressed.

I'm not sure why people don't seem to appreciate HD mode: it's actually very useful in certain applications.  In fact, I made a short video explaining HD mode, how it works, and where HD mode can add value :)



Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 
The following users thanked this post: nctnico, egonotto, Detlev

Offline Sighound36

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 549
  • Country: gb
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #214 on: June 08, 2023, 09:26:28 am »
For some reason the forum just would not let me post it  :-//


Hello Paul

The HD button is the same as ERS on the Lercoy though upto 15 bits (which is located in the main individual channel set up section, you can select the amount of bits in 0.5 bit steps) I have owned the previous RTO2000 scope which gave you '16 bits' 8 of them in software. and was used the HD thunderbird two luanch sequence   :-DD.

Comparing the two it did not offer anything I don't have already, However if you are not used to this level of refinement and the ability to 'hone in' on signals buried within the noise, then yes I can see this being quite a revaltion for the user  8)

Not taking away the fact is a great scope  :-+

Seeking quality measurement equipment at realistic cost with proper service backup. If you pay peanuts you employ monkeys.
 
The following users thanked this post: pdenisowski

Offline Sighound36

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 549
  • Country: gb
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #215 on: June 09, 2023, 09:38:54 am »
Apologies in the main review I forgot to mention two other quality points I missed off the list.

MX04 'extra likes'

Bode plot ability and set up wizard can't fault it spot on, simple intutive and for oursleves with filter characterisation almost essential (Lecroy take note!)

A very small but neat feature of when saving any screen information to usb drive, the MX04 automatically sets up and labels a file named MX04, may not seem a great deal but if in the heat of battle and you need a quick one-shot screen grab of an important event, you will not miss it by having to set up and label a file. Rather than going back a trawling through many files to find it.

Like I mentions simple, but very useful  8)
Seeking quality measurement equipment at realistic cost with proper service backup. If you pay peanuts you employ monkeys.
 
The following users thanked this post: pdenisowski

Offline luudee

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 274
  • Country: th
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #216 on: June 26, 2023, 08:29:49 am »

Just got my MXO4 eval unit !

This thing is huge!!! It makes my Siglent 5104X look like a toy !  The screen is gigantic.

More later !

luudee

 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, Martin72

Offline Sighound36

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 549
  • Country: gb
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #217 on: June 27, 2023, 08:39:23 am »
I actually found it about average size wise, although that depends on the size of your bench in fairness, it's very close to the HDO6000A size. Let us know how you get on with this quality scope  8)

Shortly I will have another review of some great Rohde & Schwarz equipment the FPL spectrum analyser.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2023, 05:25:54 pm by Sighound36 »
Seeking quality measurement equipment at realistic cost with proper service backup. If you pay peanuts you employ monkeys.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, 2N3055, pdenisowski, Martin72

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #218 on: June 29, 2023, 06:41:03 am »
The screen is gigantic.

No one has ever asked us to make the screen smaller :)

And there's also an HDMI output, so you can go even bigger ....
Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline luudee

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 274
  • Country: th
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #219 on: July 04, 2023, 10:38:10 am »

My MXO4 Review
------------------------

Disclaimer: I am not a professional reviewer, these are just some
observation from using the MXO4 for 7 days.

Looking through the forum, I feel like Sighound36 did a great job
reviewing the MXO4. I only have had mine for 7 days to play with,
and focused mostly on the usability aspects and user interface.

To learn how to use the MXO4 I pulled out one of my customers
projects, where we had some issues with SPI interface. I wanted
to see if the MXO4 would be better or worse than my SDS5K.

Previously, I had many issues with the SDS5K when I tried to do
large captures. Unfortunately, the MXO4 exhibits very similar issues.
It cannot decode a simple SPI interface. It also has issues
triggering properly. Yes, I had the voltage levels/threshold set
correctly. I can see transitions and manually decode the correct
values, but I was expecting the MXO to do that. I observed the same
failures in both Logic Analyzer mode and analog scope mode.

The zoom feature of the MXO4 is great if you want to examine a part
of signal wave form. Something like under or overshot, for example,
it is great to zoom in. However, if you are trying to zoom in on a
large capture, the zoom function of the MXO4 is horrible and I can't
see myself using that in real life debugging sessions. It is quite
common for me to capture "long" transactions. In these cases when
I want to zoom in to examine a smaller section, the MXO4 zooming
becomes useless. R&S should take a look at how Siglent implemented
zooming and expend their zooming capabilities.

Overall, the User Interface is very slow and buggy. The unit freezes
randomly, and requires a power cycle. Simple adjustments, like
horizontal zoom, can freeze the unit for up to 15 seconds, before
it updates the screen.

The UI & menus take a bit getting used to, that's not necessarily
bad, but I did feel that the menus were confusing at times (specially
trying to set up a trigger for SPI decoding, for example). Compared
to Siglent, I found they grouped the functions and menus more logically.

For me, the MXO4 is just not worth it. My SDS5K that costs 1/4 of
the MXO4, and does everything I need and in many areas much better
than the MXO4. My next scope must have a faster user interface and
excel in decoding various protocols.


luudee

 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, 2N3055, maxwell3e10, Martin72

Offline shabaz

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 145
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #220 on: July 13, 2023, 02:15:38 am »
Hello,

From my perspective, I liked that the display could be set up to pack a lot of SPI decode visually on the screen, which is useful for data transactions of many dozens of bytes. Where a data transaction is even longer, for instance, involving hundreds of bytes (perhaps during a file read or write in an SPI Flash file system) then it was able to comfortably automatically decode while zoomed out to the view of the entire transactions.
The protocol export functionality is also very impressive, in decent formats (particularly HTML and Python formats), allowing for further analysis (e.g. generation of ping-pong diagrams or for profiling).
See here for an example of SPI decode (at time 23 minutes 33 seconds, if it doesn't automatically start from that point):


The two screenshots show the scaling of the protocol decode view.
« Last Edit: July 13, 2023, 02:26:52 am by shabaz »
 
The following users thanked this post: pdenisowski

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #221 on: July 13, 2023, 10:43:30 am »
It cannot decode a simple SPI interface.

It also has issues triggering properly. Yes, I had the voltage levels/threshold set correctly. I can see transitions and manually decode the correct values, but I was expecting the MXO to do that. I observed the same failures in both Logic Analyzer mode and analog scope mode.

This is very surprising to me:  I've worked with the SPI decode extensively and it works very well.  In fact, here's a short video I made a few weeks ago showing the MXO4 SPI decode in order to help diagnose issues people here were having decoding the SPI output of the Batronix demo board using other (non-MXO4) oscilloscopes:

https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/new-scope-demoboard-from-batronix/msg4899155/#msg4899155

I did an entire video showing how to configure and decode SPI on the MXO4



I can post lots of other examples (screenshots, videos) showing the SPI decode on the MXO4 using a variety of SPI signal sources.  It's worked every single time I've used it.


Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #222 on: July 13, 2023, 10:47:09 am »
Here's a video I made back in March while I was working on the "Understanding SPI" and "Decoding SPI" videos - MXO4 correctly (and easily) decoding SPI coming from a Raspberry Pi connected to a 7 segment display



and a screenshot of the MXO4 decoding SPI traffic correctly at > 40 Mbps  (also made back in March).  The hex values are just "PAUL" in ASCII over and over :)  This one was made using the logic probes instead of analog probes.

« Last Edit: July 13, 2023, 10:52:03 am by pdenisowski »
Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #223 on: July 13, 2023, 10:58:14 am »

Overall, the User Interface is very slow and buggy. The unit freezes randomly, and requires a power cycle. Simple adjustments, like horizontal zoom, can freeze the unit for up to 15 seconds, before it updates the screen.

Which FW version were you using?  This also is very surprising to me.

It sounds very much like the unit you were using was not current hardware or firmware: we have many, many MXO4 users and there are many independent reviews of the MXO4, including Dave's own review (and he is absolutely not shy about pointing out problems :)) and they are all overwhelmingly positive and without the issues you are reporting.
Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 

Offline luudee

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 274
  • Country: th
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #224 on: July 13, 2023, 11:03:23 am »

@Paul,

I don't know what firmware the unit had that I was testing.

I spent 7 days trying to make it decode a perfectly valid SPI stream (very long 256K transaction), and could not make it work.

I stand by my review.  It was not able to do any decoding, neither analog nor digital.

I am glad to see you guys are looking in to it.

luudee


 

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #225 on: July 13, 2023, 12:53:05 pm »
I don't know what firmware the unit had that I was testing.

I spent 7 days trying to make it decode a perfectly valid SPI stream (very long 256K transaction), and could not make it work.

I stand by my review.  It was not able to do any decoding, neither analog nor digital.

I am glad to see you guys are looking in to it.

Well, I can't say we're looking into it because we have lots of people using the SPI decode (myself included) and none of them have reported any issues :)

If you do get a chance to reproduce the issue, please let us know.  Unfortunately, without screenshots, settings, or a more detailed description of your setup, etc. there's no way for us to know why it wasn't working for you.  I'm assuming you didn't contact tech support?

Silly question:  did the MXO4 you were using have the low speed serial decode option (MXO-K510)?  If your MXO4 didn't have the software option, it would explain why you saw the signals but never saw a decode.

Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 

Offline Sighound36

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 549
  • Country: gb
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #226 on: July 13, 2023, 12:58:14 pm »
Never had that issue on the demonstration unit I loaned at all, I know there has been a few firmware updates since March
« Last Edit: July 13, 2023, 02:29:10 pm by Sighound36 »
Seeking quality measurement equipment at realistic cost with proper service backup. If you pay peanuts you employ monkeys.
 
The following users thanked this post: pdenisowski

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26907
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #227 on: July 13, 2023, 02:57:43 pm »
256k transactions may be too long for the decoding buffer to store.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Offline shabaz

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 145
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #228 on: July 13, 2023, 06:32:52 pm »
Hi,

I wonder if the 256k bytes is related to reading or writing the entire contents of SPI memory. I tried capturing and decoding all at once, and for sure after about 110K bytes the decoding slows down a lot. However, in practice, perhaps it is far more likely to want to be able to traverse the data at boundaries, for instance grouped transactions of a higher-level protocol, or (if it is SPI memory) perhaps in pages of say 256 bytes. In that case, the MXO shines because of the history feature, to make it practical to thumb through, and it works very fast for that. I just tried that, in my case pages of 320 bytes, for a total of 800 pages, which is 256k total bytes (see image attachment). My SPI code (running on a Pi Pico) was coded to send groups of 8 bytes of data, with a start header (0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xaa) followed by a 4-byte sequence number, so I could easily see if anything was missed (it was not).
That was with SPI, but in the past I have also tried RS-485, with 600k bytes (again using the history feature, to make it practical to view data). That is handy for DMX, where each payload is 512 bytes, but there could be hundreds of such payloads that need to be examined, moving forward/backward through every payload using forward/rewind buttons on the MXO History menu, like a tape recorder.
 
 
The following users thanked this post: pdenisowski

Offline luudee

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 274
  • Country: th
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #229 on: July 14, 2023, 03:21:15 am »

Well, I can't say we're looking into it because we have lots of people using the SPI decode (myself included) and none of them have reported any issues :)

If you do get a chance to reproduce the issue, please let us know.  Unfortunately, without screenshots, settings, or a more detailed description of your setup, etc. there's no way for us to know why it wasn't working for you.  I'm assuming you didn't contact tech support?

Silly question:  did the MXO4 you were using have the low speed serial decode option (MXO-K510)?  If your MXO4 didn't have the software option, it would explain why you saw the signals but never saw a decode.


I would have assumed that the scope would have told me if the decoding feature was not available.

I am pretty sure it was, as I was doing all kind of setting up ...

One more, thing, the guys who are playing with SPI captures now, try to keep SPI_CS always low (asserted).
See if it still locks and decodes.

luudee
« Last Edit: July 14, 2023, 03:23:22 am by luudee »
 
The following users thanked this post: Someone

Offline shabaz

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 145
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #230 on: July 14, 2023, 04:13:12 am »
Hi,

I have tried *CS permanently low from the first byte to the last byte, and it makes no difference, it works for me. Please see the attached screenshot.
As mentioned, this is making use of the History feature, so I can page through the content, and the performance and decode is fast (I can take a video of it if required).
If I do not use the history feature, as mentioned further up, I do see performance struggle with about 100k bytes of the decode. With the history feature, I have not seen any issue with 600k bytes (that's the max I have tried in the past, although that was with RS-485. With SPI, I have just tested 256k).
If you have an example scenario that you can simulate with (say) a Raspberry Pi or Pi Pico, and a screenshot or video of what you see on your current setup, then anyone can try to set it up so that a precise comparison can be made if you like? Because otherwise, for all I know, unfortunately my SPI configuration or speed, or a dozen other things, may be completely different to what you used.
« Last Edit: July 14, 2023, 04:16:09 am by shabaz »
 
The following users thanked this post: pdenisowski

Offline luudee

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 274
  • Country: th
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #231 on: July 14, 2023, 05:13:08 am »
Hi,

I have tried *CS permanently low from the first byte to the last byte, and it makes no difference, it works for me. Please see the attached screenshot.
As mentioned, this is making use of the History feature, so I can page through the content, and the performance and decode is fast (I can take a video of it if required).
If I do not use the history feature, as mentioned further up, I do see performance struggle with about 100k bytes of the decode. With the history feature, I have not seen any issue with 600k bytes (that's the max I have tried in the past, although that was with RS-485. With SPI, I have just tested 256k).
If you have an example scenario that you can simulate with (say) a Raspberry Pi or Pi Pico, and a screenshot or video of what you see on your current setup, then anyone can try to set it up so that a precise comparison can be made if you like? Because otherwise, for all I know, unfortunately my SPI configuration or speed, or a dozen other things, may be completely different to what you used.



Thank you for the test.

I don't know what to say.  It does look like it is working for you. I wonder if I indeed had some very old
firmware, which is also odd, why would R&S give me a scope with useless FW ?!

In any case, my test case is a custom product I designed for a client., It has a CPU booting from SPI
FLASH. We were trying to see where it was stopping to read the SPI FLASH, hence huge capture, etc ...
At the end got it all working ...

One more thing, what's the speed of your SPI bus ?   In my case, it was running at 20 MHz.


luudee


 

Offline jusaca

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 69
  • Country: de
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #232 on: July 14, 2023, 11:15:23 am »
From the screenshot saying "Bitrate:  991600 kbps" I would assume the SPI clock to be set to 1 MHz ;)
 
The following users thanked this post: luudee

Offline shabaz

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 145
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #233 on: July 15, 2023, 04:04:43 am »
Just out of curiosity I tried using the analog channels today, to see what difference there is, using a 20 MHz (approx.) SPI clock. It is in the file called spi-using-analog-channels.jpg. This example has 256,000 bytes of SPI data as before.

The MXO 4 allows the creation of additional views of the data (called layouts in R&S terminology), and the next screenshot shows the SPI SCK line on a separate view to blow it up to see more detail (sch-magnified-view.jpg).

What's neat is that it is possible to see any anomalies during the entire acquisition. In that example, a 100 pF load was deliberately applied to the SCK line part-way through the transfer, and it is possible to see the impact the load had on the analog signal as well as locating the data corruption (if the analog signal is significantly distorted).

It's easy to find the anomaly, by dragging the slider (see anomaly-located.jpg) until the visible waveform shows the corruption, and then the page of data has been identified.

The final attached image just shows a temperature-colored view to see how much consistency there was for the SCK signal over time.
« Last Edit: July 15, 2023, 04:33:24 am by shabaz »
 
The following users thanked this post: nctnico, tv84, pdenisowski

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26907
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #234 on: July 15, 2023, 09:25:55 am »
I assume the MXO4 also has reverse brightness. This makes an anomaly stand out even better (at least on the RTM3004 it does).
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 
The following users thanked this post: shabaz

Offline shabaz

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 145
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #235 on: July 15, 2023, 02:06:37 pm »
That did it! It is in a different menu to the RTM3004, but found it amongst the settings options.
There's several other options too, I've attached a screenshot of them.
This is the definition of them in the user manual:
  • "False colors": color changes gradually in a wide color spectrum.
  • "Single Event": single events and very seldom events appear yellow, a higher
    cumulative occurrence is shown with blue color. This view helps to identify specific
    events.
  • "Spectrum": colors display the wavelengths of the light. Low cumulative occurrence
    is displayed blue like high wavelength.
  • "Temperature": color changes gradually from blue (low temperature) to red (high
    temperature) with increasing cumulative occurrence.
« Last Edit: July 15, 2023, 02:10:08 pm by shabaz »
 
The following users thanked this post: nctnico, pdenisowski

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #236 on: July 15, 2023, 02:42:29 pm »
Not a bad scope.. 8)
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, pdenisowski

Offline shabaz

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 145
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #237 on: August 11, 2023, 09:00:17 pm »
Hi, there's a new MXO 4 firmware update (version 1.4.2.2) since the end of last month! One feature that is great is the log-frequency-axis for the spectrum analyzer functionality. It seems to work well, here's a 4-minute video containing some quick experiments with it:



« Last Edit: August 11, 2023, 09:04:16 pm by shabaz »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, tv84, tooki, pdenisowski, Martin72, mawyatt, luudee, Rydda, Stewart8

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #238 on: August 11, 2023, 09:46:00 pm »
It seems to work well, here's a 4-minute video containing some quick experiments with it:

Nice video - thanks!
Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 
The following users thanked this post: shabaz

Offline tv84

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3221
  • Country: pt
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #239 on: August 12, 2023, 08:02:54 am »
It seems to work well, here's a 4-minute video containing some quick experiments with it:

Beauty. It almost seems you have a demoboard to show off the MXO. Very instructive examples and explanations.  :clap:
 
The following users thanked this post: shabaz

Offline shabaz

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 145
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #240 on: August 12, 2023, 12:39:46 pm »
Hi,

Thanks! For the signals, Matlab was used to create some of them (and then stored them in the MXO 4), it directly accepts CSV format waveform files, provided there is a 43-line header (which can be copy-pasted from any waveform saved from the MXO itself). The 10 MHz signal was from an AD9954 chip (it was a custom PCB, but there are some ready-made modules on AliExpress, although I have not tried them).
For the audio signals, it was using a cheap ADAU1401 DSP board (from AliExpress), the details are on GitHub. It is a low-cost way to create all sorts of tones/filters etc, all controlled from a Pi.  (It could be done using a sound card and Matlab but I was planning to use the DSP chip for a standalone speech processor eventually, and be able to instruct it to notch out up to several tones simultaneously, and adjust bandwidth etc). The chip doesn't have a lot of processing power, there are better DSP modules on AliExpress, although they need a separate ADC/DAC (that is built-in to the ADAU1401 chip).
 
The following users thanked this post: pdenisowski, Martin72, mawyatt

Offline mawyatt

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3269
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #241 on: August 12, 2023, 01:33:37 pm »
@ shabaz. Nice video, and good selection of the waveforms to demo the new MXO4, well done :-+

Very impressive display of the MXO4 SA type capabilities. The log frequency scale and speed of the performed Fourier Transform (not sure if it's an FFT or CZT) are very nice indeed.

Wish we could afford one!!

Best
Curiosity killed the cat, also depleted my wallet!
~Wyatt Labs by Mike~
 
The following users thanked this post: shabaz

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #242 on: August 12, 2023, 05:11:31 pm »
Thanks! For the signals, Matlab was used to create some of them (and then stored them in the MXO 4), it directly accepts CSV format waveform files, provided there is a 43-line header (which can be copy-pasted from any waveform saved from the MXO itself). The 10 MHz signal was from an AD9954 chip (it was a custom PCB, but there are some ready-made modules on AliExpress, although I have not tried them).
For the audio signals, it was using a cheap ADAU1401 DSP board (from AliExpress), the details are on GitHub. It is a low-cost way to create all sorts of tones/filters etc, all controlled from a Pi.  (It could be done using a sound card and Matlab but I was planning to use the DSP chip for a standalone speech processor eventually, and be able to instruct it to notch out up to several tones simultaneously, and adjust bandwidth etc). The chip doesn't have a lot of processing power, there are better DSP modules on AliExpress, although they need a separate ADC/DAC (that is built-in to the ADAU1401 chip).

Wow ... just wow.  Very impressed. 
Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 
The following users thanked this post: shabaz

Offline maxwell3e10

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 869
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #243 on: August 12, 2023, 08:54:37 pm »
Can the units of vertical scale be changed to V/sqrt(Hz) and plotted on log scale? Can the spectrum be averaged and then saved to a data file or to a reference spectrum?
« Last Edit: August 12, 2023, 09:24:05 pm by maxwell3e10 »
 

Offline shabaz

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 145
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #244 on: August 12, 2023, 11:05:08 pm »
Hi,
It supports a total of four options for the vertical scale (one is linear, in Volts, the rest are log power and voltage). The spectrum can be averaged, and the averaged spectrum can be saved to a data file, and to a reference spectrum. The data file format is CSV, possible to decode for instance with Python (see the spectrum_tool.py read_csv function on line 46), including all the spectrum analyzer settings (including resolution bandwidth, window type setting, etc).

 
The following users thanked this post: maxwell3e10

Offline Wolfgang

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1775
  • Country: de
  • Its great if it finally works !
    • Electronic Projects for Fun
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #245 on: August 12, 2023, 11:27:48 pm »
... In reality, there are never 18Bits. What counts is the effective number of bits, and a measurement of this reveals that the effective bits are below 11, regardless of what they claim. Look here:

https://electronicprojectsforfun.wordpress.com/to-enob-or-not-to-enob/

The other manufacturers (and also R&S for their better scopes) give ENOB values in their specs. For the MXO, there are none (for a good reason).

 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, maxwell3e10, Martin72

Offline maxwell3e10

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 869
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #246 on: August 13, 2023, 03:39:05 am »
... In reality, there are never 18Bits. What counts is the effective number of bits, and a measurement of this reveals that the effective bits are below 11, regardless of what they claim. Look here:

https://electronicprojectsforfun.wordpress.com/to-enob-or-not-to-enob/

The other manufacturers (and also R&S for their better scopes) give ENOB values in their specs. For the MXO, there are none (for a good reason).
Thanks for an amazing level of analysis! I think it's interesting to compare the spectra of the scopes directly. Picking only one largest peak obscures how "clean" the spectrum is and the level of white noise. In many cases having a second or third harmonic due to a non-linearity is not so bad. Also high resolution is often useful to see small features at the end of a large signal (like tail end of a decay) in a single shot. So SNR and DR  can be useful characteristics in addition to SINAD and can also be converted to an ENOB, where "effective" has a different meaning.
« Last Edit: August 13, 2023, 03:46:18 am by maxwell3e10 »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #247 on: August 13, 2023, 10:40:28 am »
Quote from: Wolfgang
The other manufacturers (and also R&S for their better scopes) give ENOB values in their specs.

Right, Siglent for example, but also (and of course) Lecroy, even Rigol....
For the HDO4000, for example, it was afaik 8.5 bits (without further details).
Lecroy specifies between 8.4 and 8.7, depending on the bandwidth of the model (WS 4000HD), Siglent also.
And Siglent are the only ones who write which parameters they used for this:
Quote
1:99.99 MHz input(100 MHz model uses 49.99 MHz),-0.5 dBFS,20 mV/div,50 Ω input impedance
I assume that lecroy measures similarly.
And nobody knows how Rigol measured it. ;)
I would like to repeat your measurements on my siglent, but unfortunately I don't have the equipment(only a SDG2122X).
But you described a self-built oscillator for this purpose, is there any more information about it?
Gladly in a separate thread, otherwise this will be too offtopic here.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline Wolfgang

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1775
  • Country: de
  • Its great if it finally works !
    • Electronic Projects for Fun
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #248 on: August 13, 2023, 06:22:52 pm »
Quote from: Wolfgang
The other manufacturers (and also R&S for their better scopes) give ENOB values in their specs.

Right, Siglent for example, but also (and of course) Lecroy, even Rigol....
For the HDO4000, for example, it was afaik 8.5 bits (without further details).
Lecroy specifies between 8.4 and 8.7, depending on the bandwidth of the model (WS 4000HD), Siglent also.
And Siglent are the only ones who write which parameters they used for this:
Quote
1:99.99 MHz input(100 MHz model uses 49.99 MHz),-0.5 dBFS,20 mV/div,50 Ω input impedance
I assume that lecroy measures similarly.
And nobody knows how Rigol measured it. ;)
I would like to repeat your measurements on my siglent, but unfortunately I don't have the equipment(only a SDG2122X).
But you described a self-built oscillator for this purpose, is there any more information about it?
Gladly in a separate thread, otherwise this will be too offtopic here.

Hi Martin,

the ENOB test oscillator schematics is at the bottom of the ENOB page.

regards
  Wolfgang
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline Wolfgang

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1775
  • Country: de
  • Its great if it finally works !
    • Electronic Projects for Fun
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #249 on: August 14, 2023, 03:30:09 pm »
... In reality, there are never 18Bits. What counts is the effective number of bits, and a measurement of this reveals that the effective bits are below 11, regardless of what they claim. Look here:

https://electronicprojectsforfun.wordpress.com/to-enob-or-not-to-enob/

The other manufacturers (and also R&S for their better scopes) give ENOB values in their specs. For the MXO, there are none (for a good reason).
Thanks for an amazing level of analysis! I think it's interesting to compare the spectra of the scopes directly. Picking only one largest peak obscures how "clean" the spectrum is and the level of white noise. In many cases having a second or third harmonic due to a non-linearity is not so bad. Also high resolution is often useful to see small features at the end of a large signal (like tail end of a decay) in a single shot. So SNR and DR  can be useful characteristics in addition to SINAD and can also be converted to an ENOB, where "effective" has a different meaning.

Hi,

I think different. A discerned "spike" in the spectrum corresponds to a perceivable "wiggle" in the time domain, and that, IMHO, hurts more than just a randomly increased noise level, as it can be mistaken for a "real" signal.
It all depends on what kinds of signal you are working with.

regards
  Wolfgang
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, 2N3055, jusaca

Offline shabaz

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 145
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #250 on: August 18, 2023, 06:35:57 pm »
Hi,
(Hopefully people are not bored of looking at 'scope traces - I just thought these ones looked nice).
I was working on a little project today, and by chance there was a good reminder to me that it is well worth checking at higher frequencies, for spurious emissions.
The first screenshot (ac-before-modification.jpg) shows the problem, which was occurring with a BJT+transformer oscillator. I used the normal 'scope probe supplied with the MXO 4, connected to the output.
That screenshot shows that visible parts of the anomaly could be spotted and zoomed-in, but the log-frequency-axis spectrum analysis was handy to see both the fundamental (25 kHz) and harmonics, as well as all manner of spurious content around 30 to 90 MHz.

I had some small ferrite cores, I put them into the base of the transistors, and then the situation was greatly improved, as can be seen in the second screenshot.

The photo shows the ferrite cores.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2023, 06:40:18 pm by shabaz »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, tv84, nez, Martin72, Serg65536

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #251 on: September 16, 2023, 06:58:35 pm »
Hi Martin,

the ENOB test oscillator schematics is at the bottom of the ENOB page.

regards
  Wolfgang

Hi Wolfgang,
Thank you for adding also the gerber files on the ENOB page.  :-+
I´ve ordered the pcb (JLCPCB) and now...
...it ready for the first test.  8)

« Last Edit: September 16, 2023, 07:38:19 pm by Martin72 »
 
The following users thanked this post: shabaz, egonotto, Wolfgang, jusaca

Offline Bernd_2

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 1
  • Country: de
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #252 on: October 24, 2023, 09:54:21 pm »
I'm thinking of buying the MXO4 Bundle and have read the Specs and the Manual.

What I'm missing is the XY-Mode that is standard even with the RTC1000. Does anybody know if the XY Mode will be implemented? And if so with Z-Mode?

And I wonder if the Zone Key means Zone-Trigger an will set to work soon.
 

Online Martin72

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5841
  • Country: de
  • Testfield Technician

Offline ebastler

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6504
  • Country: de
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #254 on: November 02, 2023, 09:50:23 pm »
7789€ incl. VAT for the 200Mhz ? This must be a fake...

https://www.galaxus.de/en/s4/product/rohde-schwarz-mxo44-242-mixed-signal-table-oscilloscope-4-channel-analogue-analogue-digital-200mhz-d-23916761

Dunno... that seller is a Swiss company originally. Maybe there is some re-importing happening, and prices in Switzerland are lower? (Ha ha, not according to my experience travelling there...  ;))

Galaxus sell pretty much everything. The only time I ordered something from them (a Swiss-made household product which was not available elsewhere), they eventually canceled the order four weeks later, stating that the manufacturer had discontinued the product. They were polite and apologetic about it though and refunded my pre-payment right away.
 

Offline goaty

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 205
  • Country: de
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #255 on: November 02, 2023, 09:57:52 pm »
Here's one at Batronix for 7500 excl Vat:
https://www.batronix.com/shop/sales/index.html
 


Offline DaneLaw

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 450
  • Country: dk
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #257 on: November 03, 2023, 02:01:16 am »
Even down at 7289 EURO back in the first half of the year. 1/4-23
Sketchy' if that also should carry EU VAT.

 

Offline shabaz

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 145
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #258 on: November 10, 2023, 05:35:17 am »
I tried some third party probes with the MXO 4. These ones are for hands-free probing fine points on a PCB that might not have test points.
I thought they were not bad; a nice problem-solver for the times you want free hands to focus on controlling other equipment, or spending a bit longer fine-tweaking captures or obtaining longer measurements - I used it for capturing long periods of slow I2C traffic.
Annoyingly I purchased the model without the 10:1 attenuation indicator pin on the BNC connector : (


 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, pdenisowski

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11536
  • Country: ch
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #259 on: November 18, 2023, 01:05:26 am »
...i would assume zone trigger will not be added free of charge but as an option later on.
Zone will be a free upgrade.  And it's really good  8)
Any word on this?
 

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11536
  • Country: ch
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #260 on: November 18, 2023, 01:11:24 am »
Quote
Tektronix does the same with their new 2 Series

Everyone does it, siglent, rigol also.
You buy a fully loaded scope in every case.
Even when you buy the basic model, every costs are into the price for it plus bonus.
And when you relase an option like freeing a prisioner, it will make more plus.
Therefore they can make "promo-offers" like all options including, without weeping in their cushions.
And therefore I don´t have any problems to free prisioners without paying ransom money.

Thats not what i meant. Selling options is fine for me of course. There is cost involved to develop software options and its clear for me that it costs money. For example if a bode plot function saves a lot of time at work because i don't have to sweep it manually this money is justified.

Tektronix released the 2 series without the MSO function implemented. Advertising features that are not there but might be in the future is the problem. At least R&S doesn't promise anything in particular and just advertise what is already there. ...
Weeeeeeelllll...

Early brochures/datasheets and price lists for the MXO 4 listed the MXO4-K530 option (aerospace serial decode) both separately and as a component of the options bundle, and also mentioned mask testing as "coming in a future update". All mention of those has since vanished (as I suppose the Zone button on the front panel would, too, if it weren't hardware...).


I also wish R&S were clearer on whether the digital channels do or do not require a software option. Buying the mixed-signal option includes two digital probes, but the MXO5 brochure claims you can just borrow them from another MXO4 or MXO5. (Meanwhile, the part number of said digital probes is shared among many other scope models, too.)
« Last Edit: November 18, 2023, 01:15:46 am by tooki »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline shabaz

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 145
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #261 on: February 19, 2024, 06:06:03 pm »
Just wanted to share a screenshot if people are interested in seeing more of the spectrum analysis!
I was looking at the output from a MAX2870 frequency synthesizer board (cheap board from AliExpress) and decided to try three different instruments. The settings are not like-for-like, admittedly, but to see the spectrum trace fidelity with the MXO is remarkable. The screenshots are for a 30 MHz signal, with the sweep across a wide spectrum range (20-400MHz) to see harmonics.

The normal SAs take several seconds per sweep and so averaging is slower. The MXO display updated perhaps 50-100 times quicker, i.e. it was very real-time.

One of the new features in the software release from last month, is menu pinch-to-zoom. I initially didn't understand the use-case for that. However, now it came in very handy to resize the spectrum controls menu, so it wouldn't get in the way of the trace, so that I could deliberately do a screenshot with the settings in there visible.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, tooki, 2N3055, MJF, pdenisowski, Martin72

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11536
  • Country: ch
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #262 on: February 19, 2024, 11:25:46 pm »
One of the new features in the software release from last month, is menu pinch-to-zoom. I initially didn't understand the use-case for that. However, now it came in very handy to resize the spectrum controls menu, so it wouldn't get in the way of the trace, so that I could deliberately do a screenshot with the settings in there visible.
Nice post!

What software update from last month? I checked last week (and again just now) and the website still shows the October release, 2.0.3.
 
The following users thanked this post: shabaz

Offline shabaz

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 145
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #263 on: February 19, 2024, 11:44:07 pm »
Thanks!
Sorry, I just checked, I too am running F/W 2.0.3.0. I forgot I'd upgraded that toward the end of last year, and not a month ago.
 

Offline rbe

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 8
  • Country: ie
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #264 on: February 24, 2024, 09:04:06 am »
Greetings fellow EEs. I work as a design engineer specializing in power supplies, and I'm seriously contemplating the purchase of a R&S MXO44-242 variant. I've negotiated a discount of a few hundred euros from the initial advertised price. Despite this, it is still a relatively expensive piece of equipment and find myself a bit hesitant about making the final decision. I know this is a cutting edge oscilloscope with great specs, but it seems to lack several measurement/other options, which are available as separate purchases.

In essence, I am trying to justify this purchase and wonder if there might be future special offers from R&S where they bundle these additional measurement options together at a more affordable price compared to buying them individually. I am aware of the 'MXO4-BNDL' that is currently selling here in Europe at around €20,000 (excl. VAT) with BW of 1.5 GHz and additional options, but this is definitely outside of my budget at the moment. I would like to hear your thoughts on this so I can clear up my mind going forward. Thanks in advance! 
 

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11536
  • Country: ch
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #265 on: February 24, 2024, 07:22:10 pm »
I think the market is a bit slow now in general, which is why everyone is extending their promos. So if you need something now, jump on it, but if you have something to use at the moment, I wouldn’t rush. There WILL be another special. And remember that the end of the year is when the sales reps have targets they want to reach, so that’s when you can negotiate a bit more. ;)
 
The following users thanked this post: rbe

Offline radar_macgyver

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 698
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #266 on: February 26, 2024, 12:55:46 am »
i convinced my boss to spring for the MXO4-BNDL to replace an aging Tek MSO 4054. Only had it for a month, and I find the MXO4 to be leaps and bounds ahead of the Tek, though it's not a fair comparision to a much older instrument. The spectrum analyzer is really nice, very fast update rates. I have it mounted on a VESA monitor arm (with a quick disconnect), frees up some bench space. Can't add much that hasn't been covered by, say, @shabaz and others. The included probes are 700 MHz, and feel very nice in the hand. Compared to the Tek P6139A, they are lighter and thinner, the cables are equally stiff. The spring-loaded tips are nice, but take a bit getting used to.

I also ordered a single active RT-ZS20 1.5 GHz probe (I had a TAP1500 to work with the Tek). Again, haven't had much quality time with it yet, but it seems well made and feels nice in the hand. Unlike the TAP1500s, the probe body doesn't get uncomfortably warm.

The MXO4's drawbacks I've come across so far:
  • UI is a bit sluggish - using the vertical position dials to move the traces has a noticeable lag. Similar to the MSO 4054, but a lot worse than Keysight 3 or 4000 series. Really hoping R&S can improve this.
  • Though I'm running the latest firmware, I've seen a few bugs pop up now and then. For example, if I leave the scope running for many days, it can get into a mode where the reference level indicator for the traces disappears, and the left and right borders of the screen start flashing, as if the traces are being overdrawn on top of the edges of the graticule. The only fix for this is to reboot the scope. Next time it happens, I'll take a video.
  • When the scope is in the mode described above, the I2C decode seems to randomly not decode frames. May be related, but after the reboot it worked flawlessly
  • After running any of the apps, for example the frequency response app, the scope effectively does a factory preset, rather than returning to the previous settings.

My place of work is such that it's hard for me to use the 'order the instrument today and pay for the options later' model since it's hard to justify a several kilodollar purchase that's 'just software' (I've had inventory management asking me where they can place the asset tags for a Fieldfox option I bought, for instance). The BNDL offer makes all this go away, and it was fortunate that we had the budget for it.
 
The following users thanked this post: shabaz, tooki, pdenisowski, Martin72, rbe

Offline tv84

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3221
  • Country: pt
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #267 on: February 26, 2024, 02:22:58 pm »
For example, if I leave the scope running for many days, it can get into a mode where the reference level indicator for the traces disappears, and the left and right borders of the screen start flashing, as if the traces are being overdrawn on top of the edges of the graticule. The only fix for this is to reboot the scope.


 :palm: Unacceptable on a R&S device.
 

Offline pdenisowskiTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Country: us
  • Product Management Engineer, Rohde & Schwarz
    • Test and Measurement Fundamentals Playlist on the R&S YouTube channel
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #268 on: February 26, 2024, 02:30:04 pm »
The MXO4's drawbacks I've come across so far:
  • UI is a bit sluggish - using the vertical position dials to move the traces has a noticeable lag. Similar to the MSO 4054, but a lot worse than Keysight 3 or 4000 series. Really hoping R&S can improve this.
  • Though I'm running the latest firmware, I've seen a few bugs pop up now and then. For example, if I leave the scope running for many days, it can get into a mode where the reference level indicator for the traces disappears, and the left and right borders of the screen start flashing, as if the traces are being overdrawn on top of the edges of the graticule. The only fix for this is to reboot the scope. Next time it happens, I'll take a video.
  • When the scope is in the mode described above, the I2C decode seems to randomly not decode frames. May be related, but after the reboot it worked flawlessly
  • After running any of the apps, for example the frequency response app, the scope effectively does a factory preset, rather than returning to the previous settings.

Thanks for letting us know.  If you haven't already, could you contact our North American Support Center about these issues?  I'll try to reproduce them on my MXO4, but it would be helpful if you could open a case so that we can investigate and fix these issues. 

USA: Phone: 1-888-837-8772 (1-888-Test-RSA), email: customer.support@rsa.rohde-schwarz.com

Incidentally, we do have a new FW release coming out very soon (checking on exact date right now) and that might address some of the things you're reporting.

Thanks again!


Test and Measurement Fundamentals video series on the Rohde & Schwarz YouTube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8

Free online test and measurement fundamentals courses from Rohde & Schwarz:  https://tinyurl.com/mv7a4vb6
 
The following users thanked this post: tv84, tooki, Martin72

Offline radar_macgyver

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 698
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #269 on: February 26, 2024, 03:00:48 pm »
Will do. I was going to try and capture a video of this, though the second time it happened I was in the middle of debugging a board and rebooted the scope to get things working (that's when I noticed the I2C decode issue).
Also, just for completeness, the reference indicator of all traces except the currently selected one disappear when the scope gets into that funny mode.
 
The following users thanked this post: pdenisowski

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26907
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #270 on: February 26, 2024, 04:19:19 pm »
For example, if I leave the scope running for many days, it can get into a mode where the reference level indicator for the traces disappears, and the left and right borders of the screen start flashing, as if the traces are being overdrawn on top of the edges of the graticule. The only fix for this is to reboot the scope.


 :palm: Unacceptable on a R&S device.
Maybe some kind of milli-second timer overflow issue. A tell tale sign is that the problem occurs after about 49 days.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 
The following users thanked this post: shabaz

Offline radar_macgyver

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 698
  • Country: us
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #271 on: February 28, 2024, 10:34:30 pm »
Today I found my MXO44 is no longer showing the reference marker (the triangle with 'C1', 'C3') for the selected channel again (my bad, I had the sense inverted in my previous post). In the attached screenshot, I have CH1 and CH3 with the included 700 MHz probes connected to the probe comp terminal. When the screenshot was taken, CH1 was selected. Note that while CH3's reference indicator is shown, CH1 is not.

You will note that I have Settings->Appearance->'Show Labels' turned off (I find the labels distracting). On a hunch, I turned the setting back on, and used the touch-screen to toggle between CH1 and CH3 active, and both the channel reference markers are shown again. If I turn off the setting, they disappear again. Strangely, a reboot did *not* fix it this time, I have to keep the labels on to see the reference markers.

I've also forwarded this message to R&S customer support.

Not sure if I've had the scope powered for 49 days, but it has been left on continuously on the bench.
 
The following users thanked this post: Stewart8

Offline dav888

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 31
  • Country: se
  • various artists
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #272 on: February 29, 2024, 08:35:59 pm »
interesting read.. seems like most scope vendors are stuck with old platforms

I might be wrong, but even the new R&S MXO5 series, 500 Mpoints memory isn't super impressive considering you can get on a modern laptop. I like what Aaronia is doing with dual USB 3.x ports to double the throughput.

just tried the MXO5 and sure, the update rate of 4.5m waveforms per second is high, but the user-interface makes it feel like a super-slow vintage computer, so even though you might be able to capture stuff, it feels like you're operating a vintage scope from late 90's

I can see a few brands listed in this thread. what are peoples opinion, 8 vs 10 vs 12-bit, who has the best UI (i.e. fast/smooth, not too much crappy touch ux with microscopic popup-dialogs and pc-buttons)
 

Offline shabaz

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 145
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #273 on: February 29, 2024, 11:12:37 pm »
I think it's got a decent architecture. It's got (from what I can tell) a multi-core multi-tens-of-Gbps-throughput processor for its data plane, where more and more features can be added (I believe the MXO 5 uses two of them, i.e. the architecture can allow for paralleling in some fashion or other. A block diagram showing how acquisitions are processed and where features are run would be great to see!

I don't know Aaronia products (I'm on the lookout for a decent SDR), their interface requirement depends on how much RF bandwidth needs to be captured, and it's very likely they offload any significant processing onto the PC like many SDRs. Perhaps I'm wrong; the system requirement for their software seems quite basic; 2GB RAM, 1.6 GHz quad-core CPU.

I'm currently working with a NVIDIA Jetson board (funnily enough, troubleshooting it with an MXO4), and while the general processing cores on the NVIDIA chip (ARM) are nothing to write home about, the cores which will handle the actual data (CUDA cores) are more interesting, and data is processed without it having to pass through the ARM cores, once that data is in memory. For sure that's a different architecture too, I just bring it up as an example where an architecture can significantly differ from older PCs.

I've looked back at my initial notes/issues lists (with the first release of the software) and UI slowness didn't make my list, everyone has different expectations there, not denying that some scopes may have a smoother UI, and I find some parts of workflow could be improved (for instance, when saving logic captures, it's a hassle saving in several formats, I'd rather save all formats in one go). But I hope they do focus on features as much as possible, get them out the door since they appear to have a decent software release cycle, and UI speed isn't currently so slow to be noticeable when in the zone getting captures/measurements etc. The response to touch always feels extremely snappy to me, but of course the buttons/rotary controls are interfaced differently to that).
 
The following users thanked this post: tv84

Offline rbe

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 8
  • Country: ie
Re: First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
« Reply #274 on: April 08, 2024, 08:38:13 am »
New firmware version 2.1.3.2 has been released for those that own this piece of equipment.
Download link: https://www.rohde-schwarz.com/in/firmware/mxo4/
Release notes : https://scdn.rohde-schwarz.com/ur/pws/dl_downloads/pdm/firmware/1335_5272_00/MXO4_Release_Notes_2.1.3.2.pdf
 
The following users thanked this post: EEVblog, tooki, pdenisowski


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf