Re the HP2804A quartz thermometer.
I have one and a probe (without the correct calibration module).
Someday I'd like to calibrate it, but for now I can make very high resolution relative temperature measurements.
It does have GPIB, so I could conceivably run a calibration against as standard and difference the readback temperature
versus actual values in the external PC.
It would be a lot more work to reverse engineer the storage of the cal constants in the plug in modules.
The 2804A was developed and produced at the (long gone) Frequency and Time division in Santa Clara, CA.
The HP2804A is descended from the Dymec 2800A quartz thermometer which you can read about at
http://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/pdfs/IssuePDFs/1965-03.pdfDymec = an early manufacturing arm of HP.
On page 3 of this HP Journal document shows the analytically determined and then experimentally tweaked values of cutting the quartz crystal to zero the second and third order terms at one angle of 11.17 degrees and the other at 9.39 degrees.
So HP did not simply accidentally arrive at this crystal cut, it was calculated and then refined by experimentation.
One can't simply substitute a different standard crystal and get the correct temperature performance as linear temperature coefficient crystals are uncommon.
I read a story that the product was proposed to upper management with NO market research. When asked who would buy a high resolution, very accurate thermometer, the engineers said something like "I don't know, but someone will want it."
So the complete progression is dymec DY-2800A and dymec DY-2801A (two channel) and eventually the HP branded HP 2804A.
In 1965 the one channel 2800A, with one sensor went for $2,250 and the two channel, with two sensors, went for $3250.
In my experience, the probes are rare and even rarer with calibration modules, but there is always someone on Ebay selling a HP2804A without probes.
It seems people hold onto the instrument and discard the valuable part, the probe..
BTW, I pulled the cover on mine and the clock shows 10.000 MHZ, so the 10.0000001 MHZ marked on the other version appears to be something the vendor wanted to write on the tag.