Does the forum software have an option for auto-responders? These could monitor all threads, be triggered by certain keywords, and automatically post a response. If users could set these up according to their preferences, it would save some of us a lot of time!
Some suggestions (choose your own trigger words):
Fungus: "The DS1054Z is just fine!"
nctnico: "Don't forget about GW Instek!"
ebastler: "Guys,
please..."
Does the forum software have an option for auto-responders? These could monitor all threads, be triggered by certain keywords, and automatically post a response. If users could set these up according to their preferences, it would save some of us a lot of time!
Some suggestions (choose your own trigger words):
Fungus: "The DS1054Z is just fine!"
nctnico: "Don't forget about GW Instek!"
At least we're getting it down to half a page now.
ebastler: "Guys, please..."
What's really needed is a way to stop newbies from posting that question in the first place.
PS: Who's forcing you to read posts with "Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X-E" in the title? Not me.
PS: Who's forcing you to read posts with "Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X-E" in the title? Not me.
He has to! Or else, we won't have the "Guys, please..."!
PS: Who's forcing you to read posts with "Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X-E" in the title? Not me.
He has to! Or else, we won't have the "Guys, please..."!
Thanks tv84 -- you have beaten me to writing the exact same thing!
Alternative explanations: "Voices in my head make me do it!",
or "The
Show new replies to your posts list makes me do it!".
I paid $285 shipped for my DS1054Z and it gets near daily use.
I thought you have a micsig scope... If so, what happened to it?
I paid $285 shipped for my DS1054Z and it gets near daily use.
I thought you have a micsig scope... If so, what happened to it?
Nope, never owned one of those.
Hell, didn't know my question could be so much irritating to you experts...
I will probably end buying the Rigol, I'm also bored of not being able to choose, or getting the "consider the GW Instek". Siglend and Rigol have 1€ difference price on Amazon.it and the purpose of my "first oscilloscope" is to work with induction heating and all the oscillator / mosfets switching thing. 4 channels are useful, since I learned reading from you that triggering with probes switching is a thing for the expert hand, not me.
Do not know if someone has asked this, this is a very long post to read.
How do the FFT compare on both of these machines.
FFT: SDS1202X-E is the clear winner
1.6 ns rise times and four channels for under $400? Give me more of that!
Variable bandwidth with vertical sensitivity and signal level is the new must have feature. Soon all DSOs will have it.